• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲跨专业临床讨论的 TALK© 培训评估。

Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America.

机构信息

Department of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, UK.

TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, UK; Simulation and Innovation Unit, Universidad San Sebastián, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Arch Med Res. 2024 Nov;55(7):103060. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103060. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103060
PMID:39332151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare systems must adapt iteratively in response to external and local challenges while keeping patients and staff safe. Clinical debriefing is a cost-effective contributor to safety culture, facilitating learning and team adaptations that lead to improved processes, patient outcomes, and staff resilience. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, an interest has emerged in adopting TALK© to guide clinical debriefing to promote safety, mutual support, and cultural change within healthcare teams in Latin American contexts.

AIMS

To evaluate the quality and applicability of TALK© debriefing training in Latin American settings and the willingness to debrief after an educational intervention.

METHODS

Retrospective and descriptive study, examining anonymous data collected over 18 months after completing a "TALK© Debriefing Course for Healthcare Professionals" face-to-face or online. Data collected included participant characteristics, course details, quality and applicability of the intervention, and willingness to debrief.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-five participants were enrolled, most from Argentina and Mexico. The overall quality of the intervention scored 19.62/20 points, obtaining 4.86/5 points for applicability. There were no significant differences between virtual and face-to-face sessions. After the intervention, ≥93.76% of participants felt able to engage in clinical debriefing, and 97.06% reported willingness to debrief.

CONCLUSIONS

Dissemination of multi-professional clinical debriefing training in Latin America is feasible and easily scalable. The quality of the educational intervention was rated excellent in both virtual and face-to-face settings, supporting the value of remote educational diffusion. Most participants in this study intervention felt prepared and willing to debrief following the intervention.

摘要

背景

医疗保健系统必须不断适应外部和本地挑战,同时确保患者和员工的安全。临床汇报是安全文化的一种具有成本效益的贡献,可以促进学习和团队适应,从而改进流程、改善患者结局和提高员工的适应能力。在 COVID-19 大流行之后,人们对采用 TALK© 来指导临床汇报产生了兴趣,以促进拉丁美洲医疗保健团队中的安全、相互支持和文化变革。

目的

评估 TALK© 汇报培训在拉丁美洲环境中的质量和适用性,以及教育干预后进行汇报的意愿。

方法

回顾性和描述性研究,检查在完成面对面或在线“TALK© 医疗保健专业人员汇报课程”后 18 个月收集的匿名数据。收集的数据包括参与者特征、课程详细信息、干预措施的质量和适用性以及汇报意愿。

结果

共有 545 名参与者入组,他们主要来自阿根廷和墨西哥。干预措施的整体质量得分为 19.62/20 分,适用性得分为 4.86/5 分。虚拟和面对面课程之间没有显著差异。干预后,≥93.76%的参与者认为自己能够进行临床汇报,97.06%的参与者表示愿意汇报。

结论

在拉丁美洲传播多专业临床汇报培训是可行的,并且易于扩展。无论是虚拟还是面对面设置,教育干预的质量都被评为优秀,这支持了远程教育传播的价值。本研究干预措施的大多数参与者在干预后感到有准备并有意愿进行汇报。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America.拉丁美洲跨专业临床讨论的 TALK© 培训评估。
Arch Med Res. 2024 Nov;55(7):103060. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103060. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Improving Emergency Department Airway Preparedness in the Era of COVID-19: An Interprofessional, In Situ Simulation.在新冠疫情时代提升急诊科气道准备水平:一项跨专业现场模拟研究
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 15;5(3):S28-S49. doi: 10.21980/J8V06M. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
5
Exploring the experiences and perceptions of trainees undertaking a critical incident debrief training programme: A qualitative study.探讨接受关键事件汇报培训计划的学员的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024 Sep;39(5):1223-1239. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3795. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
6
Development of a Model for Video-Assisted Postoperative Team Debriefing.视频辅助术后团队汇报模型的开发。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:625-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.065. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.通过改善团队协作提高患者安全:不同模拟总结方法的效果如何?一项实用、前瞻性随机研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e015977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977.
8
Mass online training of health care workers during COVID-19: approach, impact, and outcomes for over 10,000 health care providers.大规模在线培训医护人员应对 COVID-19:超过 10000 名医护人员的方法、影响和结果。
Public Health. 2024 Aug;233:193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
Debriefing after critical incidents in rural and remote healthcare settings - a remote clinician perspective.
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Mar;23(1):7450. doi: 10.22605/RRH7450. Epub 2023 Mar 22.