Booth Hollie, Milner-Gulland E J, Bang Ashley, Bull Joseph, Moreno-Ternero Juan D, Squires Dale
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK; The Biodiversity Consultancy, 3E King's Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, UK.
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec;39(12):1102-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Biodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Principles of fair allocation - which are grounded in longstanding theories of justice and are mathematically operationalizable - are rarely used in biodiversity decision-making but can help to deliver procedural and distributive justice alongside biodiversity outcomes. We show how incorporating rules of fair allocation into biodiversity decision-making could advance policy formulation towards a safe and just future. Such rules provide a means to operationalize equity and create space for cooperatively and constructively negotiating avoidance liabilities within biodiversity impact mitigation.
生物多样性正以惊人的速度下降,一些负面影响是由满足人类基本需求所必需的活动造成的,而另一些则应避免以防止生态崩溃。避免生物多样性影响成本高昂;这些成本必须公平分配。公平分配原则——基于长期的正义理论且在数学上可操作——在生物多样性决策中很少使用,但可以在实现生物多样性成果的同时促进程序正义和分配正义。我们展示了将公平分配规则纳入生物多样性决策如何能够推动政策制定,迈向安全公正的未来。这些规则提供了一种实现公平的手段,并为在生物多样性影响缓解过程中合作性地、建设性地协商避免责任创造空间。