Qi Peng, Sun Yifeng, Pang Yue, Liu Jing, Cai Xu, Huang Shenglin, Xu Qinghua, Wang Qifeng, Zhou Xiaoyan
Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, No. 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Mol Diagn Ther. 2025 Jan;29(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00746-6. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Metastatic cancers with unclear or unknown origins pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management, frequently leading to suboptimal outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that a 90-gene expression assay is effective in predicting the primary origin and guiding the site-specific therapy to improve prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a 90-gene expression assay in patients with unclear or unknown diagnoses.
The study encompassed patients for whom a 90-gene expression assay was requested as part of standard care. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical history were collected. The assay's performance was evaluated by comparing its predicted tumor type with the final histopathological diagnosis.
Among 303 cases analyzed, a 90-gene expression assay successfully identified a molecular-based tumor type for 295 (97.4%) patients. Comparison with histopathological diagnosis revealed an overall agreement of 88.5% (170/192). In patients with a single suspected primary site (n = 140), the assay confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 90.7% of cases. For those with a differential diagnosis (n = 52), the assay narrowed down the possibilities in 82.7% of cases. Moreover, in cases where the histopathology report indicated cancer of unknown primary (n = 103), the assay offered a molecular tumor type prediction with potential clinical significance.
This study demonstrates the significant impact of a 90-gene expression assay on diagnosis and potential treatment selection for difficult-to-diagnose patients, highlighting its clinical value as a standardized molecular approach to streamline further diagnostic testing for patients with metastatic cancer of unclear or unknown origin. Further prospective study is required to assess whether employing molecular diagnostic classifiers enhances clinical outcomes in these patients.
起源不明的转移性癌症在诊断和治疗方面带来了重大挑战,常常导致治疗效果欠佳。研究表明,一种90基因表达检测方法在预测原发灶起源及指导针对特定部位的治疗以改善预后方面是有效的。本研究旨在评估90基因表达检测方法在诊断不明确或未知的患者中的临床有效性。
本研究纳入了作为标准治疗一部分而接受90基因表达检测的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学数据、肿瘤特征和临床病史。通过将检测预测的肿瘤类型与最终的组织病理学诊断进行比较来评估该检测方法的性能。
在分析的303例病例中,90基因表达检测方法成功为295例(97.4%)患者确定了基于分子的肿瘤类型。与组织病理学诊断相比,总体一致性为88.5%(170/192)。在单一疑似原发部位的患者中(n = 140),该检测方法在90.7%的病例中证实了疑似诊断。对于有鉴别诊断的患者(n = 52),该检测方法在82.7%的病例中缩小了可能性范围。此外,在组织病理学报告显示为原发灶不明的癌症的病例中(n = 103),该检测方法提供了具有潜在临床意义的分子肿瘤类型预测。
本研究证明了90基因表达检测方法对难以诊断的患者的诊断及潜在治疗选择具有重大影响,突出了其作为一种标准化分子方法的临床价值,可简化对起源不明或未知的转移性癌症患者的进一步诊断检测。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估采用分子诊断分类器是否能改善这些患者的临床结局。