Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Digital Technologies Research Center, National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69212-x.
Pandemics like COVID-19 have illuminated the significant disparities in the performance of national healthcare systems (NHCSs) during rapidly evolving crises. The challenge of comparing NHCS performance has been a difficult topic in the literature. To address this gap, our study introduces a bi-criteria longitudinal algorithm that merges fuzzy clustering with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This new approach provides a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of NHCS performance and efficiency during the early phase of the pandemic. By categorizing each NHCS as an efficient performer, inefficient performer, efficient underperformer, or inefficient underperformer, our analysis vividly represents performance dynamics, clearly identifying the top and bottom performers within each cluster of countries. Our methodology offers valuable insights for performance evaluation and benchmarking, with significant implications for enhancing pandemic response strategies. The study's findings are discussed from theoretical and practical perspectives, offering guidance for future health system assessments and policy-making.
大流行病,如 COVID-19,突显了国家医疗保健系统(NHCS)在快速演变的危机中的表现存在显著差异。在文献中,比较 NHCS 绩效的挑战一直是一个困难的话题。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究引入了一种双标准纵向算法,该算法将模糊聚类与数据包络分析(DEA)相结合。这种新方法提供了对大流行早期阶段 NHCS 绩效和效率的全面和动态评估。通过将每个 NHCS 归类为有效执行者、低效执行者、有效表现不佳者或低效表现不佳者,我们的分析生动地代表了绩效动态,清楚地识别了每个国家集群中的顶级和底部执行者。我们的方法为绩效评估和基准测试提供了有价值的见解,对增强大流行应对策略具有重要意义。从理论和实践角度讨论了研究结果,为未来的卫生系统评估和决策提供了指导。