• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第一代(Visumax 500)和第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光性透镜切除术治疗散光的结果。

The outcomes of first-generation (visumax 500) and second-generation (Visumax 800) keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgeries for astigmatism.

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Nobel Eye Institute, No. 13-5, Gongyuan Rd., Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei, 100008, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73303-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-73303-0
PMID:39333584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436722/
Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency, predictability, and residual astigmatism between first- and second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgeries in a prominent astigmatism population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and individuals who underwent first- and second-generation KLEx surgeries were enrolled. A total of 31 and 35 eyes were categorized into first and second KLEx groups, respectively. Visual acuity, refraction, topographic parameters, and surgical indices were recorded. Independent t tests were used to compare the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism between the two groups. The difference in UDVA was not significant three months after KLEx surgery (P = 0.509), and the SEs three months after surgery also presented similar values between the two groups (P = 0.552). The first KLEx group demonstrated greater residual astigmatism than did the second KLEx group throughout the three-month follow-up period (all P < 0.05). The values of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME) and correction index (CoI) were significantly better in the second KLEx group via vector analysis (all P < 0.05). Old age, high steep keratometry (K), high topographic cylinder, large angle kappa, and a small optic zone were correlated with greater residual astigmatism in the first KLEx group (all P < 0.05), whereas only a small optic zone was significantly correlated with greater residual astigmatism in the second KLEx group (P = 0.047). The second-generation KLEx is correlated with a lower risk of residual astigmatism.

摘要

评估在高度散光人群中第一代和第二代准分子激光角膜微透镜切除术(KLEx)手术的效率、可预测性和残余散光。进行了一项回顾性队列研究,招募了接受第一代和第二代 KLEx 手术的患者。共将 31 只眼和 35 只眼分别归类为第一代和第二代 KLEx 组。记录了视力、屈光度、地形参数和手术指标。使用独立 t 检验比较两组术后未矫正远视力(UDVA)、球镜等效(SE)和残余散光。KLEx 手术后三个月,两组之间的 UDVA 差异无统计学意义(P=0.509),术后三个月 SE 也呈现出两组之间相似的值(P=0.552)。在整个三个月的随访期间,第一代 KLEx 组的残余散光大于第二代 KLEx 组(均 P<0.05)。通过向量分析,第二代 KLEx 组的手术诱导散光(SIA)、差异向量(DV)、误差幅度(ME)和校正指数(CoI)值显著更好(均 P<0.05)。在第一代 KLEx 组中,年龄较大、陡峭角膜曲率(K)较高、地形散光较高、大角度 κ 和小光区与残余散光较大相关(均 P<0.05),而在第二代 KLEx 组中,只有小光区与残余散光较大显著相关(P=0.047)。第二代 KLEx 与残余散光风险降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e5/11436722/dd859df31e5e/41598_2024_73303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e5/11436722/dd859df31e5e/41598_2024_73303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e5/11436722/dd859df31e5e/41598_2024_73303_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The outcomes of first-generation (visumax 500) and second-generation (Visumax 800) keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgeries for astigmatism.第一代(Visumax 500)和第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光性透镜切除术治疗散光的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73303-0.
2
The Efficiency, Predictability, and Safety of First-Generation (Visumax 500) and Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgeries: Real-World Experiences.第一代(Visumax 500)和第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光透镜切除术的效率、可预测性及安全性:真实世界经验
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;14(7):804. doi: 10.3390/life14070804.
3
Risk Factors for Re-treatment After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.近视和近视散光的角膜屈光性透镜切除术(KLEx)后再治疗的危险因素。
J Refract Surg. 2024 May;40(6):e362-e370. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240422-03. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Refractive Coupling Effects in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Procedures: A Machine Learning-Assisted Approach.准分子激光角膜切削术治疗近视的折射性耦联效应:一种机器学习辅助方法。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Oct;40(10):e706-e715. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240826-01. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
5
The Risk Factors for Myopia Undercorrection in Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光透镜切除术近视欠矫的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;14(16):1752. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161752.
6
Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗中低度近视散光后散光矫正的矢量分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):553-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307238. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Vector analysis of high (≥3 diopters) astigmatism correction using small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis.小切口微透镜取出术与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术矫正高度(≥3 屈光度)散光的向量分析。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jul;44(7):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction in patients with different degrees of myopia: a retrospective cohort study.不同程度近视患者小切口微透镜取出术后高残余散光的地形学和手术危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03296-x.
9
Short and long term outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction: A tertiary referral centre experience.小切口透镜切除术的短期和长期疗效:一家三级转诊中心的经验。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Oct;43(8):753-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.11.020. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Optical and visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜提取术后的光学和视觉质量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jan;45(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction performed with the visumax 800 versus visumax 500 femtosecond laser.使用Visumax 800与Visumax 500飞秒激光进行小切口透镜切除术的临床结果比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98041-9.
2
Comparing The Existing Myopic Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Platforms: A Narrative Review.比较现有的近视角膜屈光透镜切除术(KLEx)平台:一项叙述性综述。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 9;19:2189-2202. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S532742. eCollection 2025.
3
The Effect of Preoperative Dry Eye Disease on the Outcome of Second (Visumax 800) Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser.2MHz 飞秒激光小透镜提取(SMILE)Pro®的屈光效果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 10;44(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02915-2.
2
Topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction in patients with different degrees of myopia: a retrospective cohort study.不同程度近视患者小切口微透镜取出术后高残余散光的地形学和手术危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03296-x.
3
Scientific Nomenclature for K (KLEx) Procedures: A Joint Editorial Statement.
术前干眼症对第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光透镜切除术结果的影响。
In Vivo. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):2144-2153. doi: 10.21873/invivo.14010.
4
The Efficiency, Predictability and Safety Between Custom-Q Femotsecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Second (Visumax 800) Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery.定制式飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与第二代(Visumax 800)角膜屈光透镜切除术之间的效率、可预测性及安全性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;15(5):634. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050634.
5
Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes Between Refractive Lens Exchange and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery in Moderate to High Myopia.中度至高度近视患者屈光性晶状体置换术与角膜屈光透镜切除术的视觉和屈光效果比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 27;15(1):43. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010043.
K(KLEx)程序的科学命名法:联合编辑声明。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Nov;39(11):726-727. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20231010-0. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
4
Comparison of Intraoperative Time Taken for Docking, Lenticule Dissection, and Overall Workflow for SMILE Performed With the VisuMax 800 Versus the VisuMax 500 Femtosecond Laser.使用VisuMax 800与VisuMax 500飞秒激光进行小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)时,对接、透镜分离的术中时间及整体工作流程的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Sep;39(9):648. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230726-03. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Vector analysis of astigmatism correction after PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE for myopic astigmatism.近视散光患者行 PRK、FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 术后的散光矫正向量分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):3999-4009. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02804-0. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Refractive and Visual Outcomes of SMILE for Compound Myopic Astigmatism With the VISUMAX 800.SMILE 治疗复合性近视散光的屈光和视觉效果,使用 VISUMAX 800。
J Refract Surg. 2023 May;39(5):294-301. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230301-02. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis.SMILE 术后近视性散光的程序化光学区对角膜屈光力的影响:向量分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;43(7):2493-2501. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02649-7. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
Efficacy of small-incision lenticule extraction surgery in high astigmatism: A meta-analysis.小切口透镜切除术治疗高度散光的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 19;9:1100241. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1100241. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical outcomes and higher order aberrations of wavefront-guided LASIK versus SMILE for correction of myopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.波前引导 LASIK 与 SMILE 矫正近视的临床疗效和高阶像差:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;101(6):606-618. doi: 10.1111/aos.15638. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Laser Assisted Stromal In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Astigmatism Corrections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)与准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗散光的系统评价和Meta分析
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;247:181-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 19.