• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。

Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2
PMID:39334090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11438393/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considering the adverse clinical consequences of pathologic tachycardia and the potential anxiety caused by physiological tachycardia in some heathy individuals, it is imperative to disseminate health information related to tachycardia for promotion in early diagnosis and appropriate management. YouTube has been increasingly used to access health care information. The aim of this study is to assess the quality and reliability of English YouTube videos focusing on tachycardia and further delve into strategies to enhance the quality of online health resources.

METHODS

We conducted a search using the specific key words "tachycardia" in YouTube online library on December 2, 2023. The first 150 videos, ranked by "relevance", were initially recorded. After exclusions, a total of 113 videos were included. All videos were extracted for characteristics and categorized based on different topics, sources or contents. Two independent raters assessed the videos using Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool, Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Tachycardia-Specific Scale (TSS), followed by statistical analyses. All continuous data in the study were presented as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

The videos had a median JAMA score of 2.00 (1.00), mDISCERN of 3.00 (1.00), GQS of 2.00 (1.00), and TSS of 6.00 (4.50). There were significant differences in JAMA (P < 0.001), mDISCERN (P = 0.004), GQS (P = 0.001) and TSS (P < 0.001) scores among different sources. mDISCERN (P = 0.002), GQS (P < 0.001) and TSS (P = 0.030) scores significantly differed among various contents. No significant differences were observed in any of the scores among video topics. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that VPI exhibited significant correlations with quality and reliability. Multiple linear regression analysis suggested that longer video duration, sources of academics and healthcare professionals were independent predictors of higher reliability and quality, while content of ECG-specific information was an independent predictor of lower quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability and educational quality of current tachycardia-related videos on YouTube are low. Longer video duration, sources of academics and healthcare professionals were closely associated with higher video reliability and quality. Improving the quality of internet medical information and optimizing online patient education necessitates collaborative efforts.

摘要

背景

考虑到病理性心动过速的临床不良后果以及某些健康个体中生理性心动过速可能引起的焦虑,传播与心动过速相关的健康信息以促进早期诊断和适当管理至关重要。YouTube 越来越多地被用于获取医疗保健信息。本研究旨在评估聚焦心动过速的英文 YouTube 视频的质量和可靠性,并进一步探讨提高在线健康资源质量的策略。

方法

我们于 2023 年 12 月 2 日在 YouTube 在线图书馆中使用特定关键词“心动过速”进行搜索。最初记录了按“相关性”排名的前 150 个视频。排除后,共纳入 113 个视频。根据不同主题、来源或内容对所有视频进行提取和分类。两名独立评估者使用美国医学会(JAMA)基准标准、改良 DISCERN(mDISCERN)工具、全球质量量表(GQS)和心动过速专用量表(TSS)评估视频,然后进行统计分析。研究中所有连续数据均以中位数(四分位距)表示。

结果

视频的 JAMA 评分为 2.00(1.00),mDISCERN 评分为 3.00(1.00),GQS 评分为 2.00(1.00),TSS 评分为 6.00(4.50)。不同来源的 JAMA(P<0.001)、mDISCERN(P=0.004)、GQS(P=0.001)和 TSS(P<0.001)评分存在显著差异。不同内容的 mDISCERN(P=0.002)、GQS(P<0.001)和 TSS(P=0.030)评分存在显著差异。视频主题之间的任何评分均无显著差异。Spearman 相关分析显示 VPI 与质量和可靠性呈显著相关。多元线性回归分析表明,视频时长较长、来源为学术界和医疗保健专业人员是可靠性和质量较高的独立预测因素,而特定心电图信息内容是质量较低的独立预测因素。

结论

目前 YouTube 上与心动过速相关的视频的可靠性和教育质量较低。视频时长较长、来源为学术界和医疗保健专业人员与视频可靠性和质量密切相关。提高互联网医疗信息质量和优化在线患者教育需要共同努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/207bcd336c55/12889_2024_20062_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/9e75110968ba/12889_2024_20062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/75621f5c9a7d/12889_2024_20062_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/473931e21c88/12889_2024_20062_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/3290c489ed39/12889_2024_20062_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/d4ceb7e4472c/12889_2024_20062_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/d604bc341949/12889_2024_20062_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/859ce70a215d/12889_2024_20062_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/207bcd336c55/12889_2024_20062_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/9e75110968ba/12889_2024_20062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/75621f5c9a7d/12889_2024_20062_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/473931e21c88/12889_2024_20062_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/3290c489ed39/12889_2024_20062_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/d4ceb7e4472c/12889_2024_20062_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/d604bc341949/12889_2024_20062_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/859ce70a215d/12889_2024_20062_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a7/11438393/207bcd336c55/12889_2024_20062_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
2
YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis-a reliability and quality analysis.YouTube 在线视频作为颈椎病患者教育的一种资源:可靠性和质量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1831. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16495-w.
3
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessment of Reliability and Validity of Celiac Disease-Related YouTube Videos: Content Analysis.乳糜泻相关YouTube视频的信效度评估:内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Feb 4;5:e58615. doi: 10.2196/58615.
5
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
6
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Ingrown Toenails.作为嵌甲信息来源的YouTube视频质量评估
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2025 Jan-Feb;115(1). doi: 10.7547/22-054.
7
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
8
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
9
Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source.评估YouTube上与阴道锥使用相关的视频作为在线信息来源的情况。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2403-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05932-y. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
10
YouTube as a source of information on reactive arthritis: a quality analysis.YouTube作为反应性关节炎信息来源的质量分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;83(Suppl 3):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s00393-024-01571-2. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
2
Quality Analysis of YouTube-Based Exercise Programs for Typically Developing Children: Content Analysis.基于YouTube的正常发育儿童锻炼项目的质量分析:内容分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;13(5):560. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050560.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of usefulness and reliability of YouTube™ videos on denture care.评估 YouTube™ 视频在假牙护理方面的有用性和可靠性。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 Feb;22(1):106-115. doi: 10.1111/idh.12771. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis-a reliability and quality analysis.YouTube 在线视频作为颈椎病患者教育的一种资源:可靠性和质量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1831. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16495-w.
3
Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study.
YouTube上关于心肌梗死视频的质量与可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43268. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Cardiogenic control of affective behavioural state.心因性控制情感行为状态。
Nature. 2023 Mar;615(7951):292-299. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05748-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Monitoring the Official YouTube Channels of E-Cigarette Companies: A Thematic Analysis.监测电子烟公司的官方 YouTube 频道:一项主题分析。
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Oct;50(5):677-682. doi: 10.1177/10901981221148964. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
7
YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.YouTube 作为小儿脊柱侧凸信息来源的可靠性和教育质量分析。
Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
YouTube as a source of information on systemic sclerosis.YouTube 作为系统性硬皮病信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug;25(8):887-892. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14363. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
10
YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality.YouTube与跟腱:互联网信息可靠性及内容质量分析
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23984. eCollection 2022 Apr.