• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳糜泻相关YouTube视频的信效度评估:内容分析

Assessment of Reliability and Validity of Celiac Disease-Related YouTube Videos: Content Analysis.

作者信息

Polat Yunus Halil, Cankurtaran Rasim Eren

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Feb 4;5:e58615. doi: 10.2196/58615.

DOI:10.2196/58615
PMID:39756057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11836586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

YouTube is an increasingly used platform for medical information. However, the reliability and validity of health-related information on celiac disease (CD) on YouTube have not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the reliability and validity of CD-related YouTube videos.

METHODS

On November 15, 2023, a search was performed on YouTube using the keyword "celiac disease." This search resulted in a selection of videos, which were then reviewed by 2 separate evaluators for content, origin, and specific features. The evaluators assessed the reliability and quality of these videos using a modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) score, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria score, the usefulness score, video power index (VPI), and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) score.

RESULTS

In the analysis of 120 initially screened CD videos, 85 met the criteria for inclusion in the study after certain videos were excluded based on predefined criteria. While the duration of the videos uploaded by health care professionals was significantly longer than the other group (P=.009), it was concluded that the median scores for mDISCERN (4, IQR 4-5 vs 2, IQR 2-3; P<.001), GQS (4, IQR 4-5 vs 3, IQR 2-3; P<.001), JAMA (4, IQR 3-4 vs 2, IQR 2-3; P<.001), and usefulness (8, IQR 7-9 vs 6, IQR 3-6; P<.001) of the videos from this group were significantly higher than those from non-health care professionals. Video interaction parameters, including the median number of views, views per day, likes, dislikes, comments, and VPI, demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that YouTube videos about CD vary significantly in reliability and quality depending on their source. Increasing the production of reliable videos by health care professionals may help to improve patient education and make YouTube a more reliable resource.

摘要

背景

YouTube 正日益成为获取医学信息的平台。然而,YouTube 上有关乳糜泻(CD)的健康相关信息的可靠性和有效性尚未得到确定。

目的

本研究旨在分析与 CD 相关的 YouTube 视频的可靠性和有效性。

方法

2023 年 11 月 15 日,在 YouTube 上使用关键词“乳糜泻”进行搜索。搜索结果筛选出一系列视频,然后由两名独立评估人员对其内容、来源和特定特征进行审查。评估人员使用改良的 DISCERN(mDISCERN)评分、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准评分、有用性评分、视频影响力指数(VPI)和全球质量量表(GQS)评分来评估这些视频的可靠性和质量。

结果

在对 120 个初步筛选的 CD 视频进行分析时,根据预定义标准排除某些视频后,85 个视频符合纳入研究的标准。虽然医疗保健专业人员上传的视频时长明显长于另一组(P = 0.009),但得出的结论是,该组视频的 mDISCERN 中位数评分(4,四分位间距 4 - 5 对比 2,四分位间距 2 - 3;P < 0.001)、GQS(4,四分位间距 4 - 5 对比 3,四分位间距 2 - 3;P < 0.001)、JAMA(4,四分位间距 3 - 4 对比 2,四分位间距 2 - 3;P < 0.001)和有用性(8,四分位间距 7 - 9 对比 6,四分位间距 3 - 6;P < 0.001)显著高于非医疗保健专业人员上传的视频。包括观看次数中位数、每日观看次数、点赞、踩、评论和 VPI 在内的视频互动参数在两组之间没有显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,YouTube 上关于 CD 的视频根据其来源不同,在可靠性和质量上存在显著差异。增加医疗保健专业人员制作可靠视频的数量可能有助于改善患者教育,并使 YouTube 成为更可靠的资源。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Reliability and Validity of Celiac Disease-Related YouTube Videos: Content Analysis.乳糜泻相关YouTube视频的信效度评估:内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Feb 4;5:e58615. doi: 10.2196/58615.
2
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
3
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.YouTube作为梨状肌注射教育资源的内容、质量和可靠性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07154-2.
4
Assessment of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of Information About Retinoblastoma on YouTube.YouTube上视网膜母细胞瘤信息的质量、可靠性及受欢迎程度评估
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2025 Jan-Feb;62(1):33-38. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20240807-03. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality?YouTube 平台上关于外侧肱骨上髁炎的信息可靠且质量高吗?
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Oct;51(5):458-462. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2129504. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.评估 YouTube 视频作为经皮神经电刺激信息源的可靠性和质量。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 21;11:e15412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15412. eCollection 2023.
7
Characteristics, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on meralgia paresthetica: a descriptive cross-sectional study.关于股外侧皮神经炎的 YouTube 视频的特征、可靠性和质量:一项描述性的横断面研究。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Aug;124(4):1343-1351. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02567-0. Epub 2024 May 6.
8
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
9
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
10
YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis-a reliability and quality analysis.YouTube 在线视频作为颈椎病患者教育的一种资源:可靠性和质量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1831. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16495-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
2
Anesthesia videos in geriatric and elderly patients on YouTube: content, quality, reliability, and usefulness assessment.YouTube 上老年患者的麻醉视频:内容、质量、可靠性及实用性评估
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 17;13:e19280. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19280. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Hepatosteatosis.将YouTube视频作为肝脂肪变性信息来源的评估
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46843. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on spasticity on youtube.评估 YouTube 上关于痉挛信息的质量和可靠性。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jul;113:142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
Chronic Diseases and Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated With Online Health Information Seeking and Using Social Networking Sites: Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Survey in Japan.与在线健康信息搜索和使用社交网站相关的慢性疾病和社会人口统计学特征:日本全国代表性横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 2;25:e44741. doi: 10.2196/44741.
4
American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease.美国胃肠病学会指南更新:乳糜泻的诊断与管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 1;118(1):59-76. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002075. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
5
Partisan asymmetries in exposure to misinformation.党派之间在接触错误信息方面的不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19837-7.
6
YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis.YouTube 视频作为白塞病相关信息的来源:可靠性和质量分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Dec;41(12):2117-2123. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05009-9. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Quality of healthcare information on YouTube: psoriatic arthritis.YouTube 上的医疗保健信息质量:银屑病关节炎。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;82(Suppl 1):30-37. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-01069-1. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Increasing a Dermatologist's Footprint on Instagram: An Analysis of Top Influencers Performing Nonsurgical Cosmetic Procedures.在 Instagram 上扩大皮肤科医生的影响力:对进行非手术性美容程序的顶级影响者的分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Aug 1;47(8):1093-1097. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003088.
9
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link.YouTube 作为新冠病毒与风湿性疾病关联信息的来源。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;39(7):2049-2054. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05176-3. Epub 2020 May 23.
10
Social media usage pattern and its influencing factors among celiac patients and their families.乳糜泻患者及其家属的社交媒体使用模式及其影响因素。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar-Apr;26(2):99-104. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_495_19.