• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版简短韧性量表在精神障碍患者中的心理计量特性。

Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), D-55122, Mainz, Germany.

Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnostics, Technical University of Braunschweig, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x
PMID:39334126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11437881/
Abstract

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess individual differences in the ability to recover from stress despite adversity and has been translated into several languages. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties (i.e., item characteristics, reliability, factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity) of the German version of the BRS in persons with mental disorders. A total of N = 5,986 persons admitted to inpatient treatment completed the German version of the BRS and other questionnaires. The discriminating power of the items, the difficulty of the items, and the internal consistency were all sufficient. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the BRS, consistent with the findings of the German validation study in a non-clinical sample. The BRS also had strict measurement invariance across diagnostic groups for mental disorders according to ICD-10. Validity was examined using a network analysis, in which the BRS demonstrated positive correlations with life satisfaction, self-efficacy and optimism and negative correlations with somatic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. The BRS can serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing resilience in clinical settings, facilitating the identification of persons with potentially lower psychosocial resources.

摘要

《简要韧性量表》(BRS)旨在评估个体在逆境中从压力中恢复的能力差异,已被翻译成多种语言。本研究旨在检验德国版 BRS 在精神障碍患者中的心理测量学特性(即项目特征、信度、因子结构、测量不变性和效度)。共有 N=5986 名住院治疗的患者完成了德国版 BRS 和其他问卷。项目的区分能力、项目的难度和内部一致性都足够。此外,验证性因子分析支持 BRS 的两因素结构,与非临床样本的德国验证研究结果一致。根据 ICD-10,BRS 还具有跨精神障碍诊断组的严格测量不变性。效度通过网络分析进行检验,其中 BRS 与生活满意度、自我效能感和乐观呈正相关,与躯体症状、焦虑、失眠和抑郁呈负相关。BRS 可作为一种在临床环境中评估韧性的可靠有效工具,有助于识别可能具有较低心理社会资源的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11437881/03b3ba9aac27/12888_2024_6062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11437881/03b3ba9aac27/12888_2024_6062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11437881/03b3ba9aac27/12888_2024_6062_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders.中文版简短韧性量表在精神障碍患者中的心理计量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x.
2
New norm values of the brief resilience scale (BRS) from the German general population with new post-COVID-19 data.来自德国普通人群的简短恢复力量表(BRS)的新常模值,以及新的 COVID-19 后数据。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;12(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01995-0.
3
Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.《简要韧性量表(BRS)的因子结构、内部信度和建构效度:一项针对社区中严重精神疾病患者的研究》
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):620-645. doi: 10.1111/papt.12336. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.简易复原力量表(BRS)西班牙语版本的信度与效度
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):e101-e110. doi: 10.1037/pas0000191. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Measurement properties and implications of the Brief Resilience Scale in healthy workers.健康劳动者简易韧性量表的测量特性及其意义。
J Occup Health. 2019 May;61(3):242-250. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12041. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale for the Mental Health Surveillance (MHS) of German adults.验证 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(WMBS)在德国成年人心理健康监测(MHS)中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Oct 26;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02304-4.
7
Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).验证波兰语版的简要恢复力量表(BRS)。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237038. eCollection 2020.
8
Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale.基于人群的德文版简易复原力量表的验证
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192761. eCollection 2018.
9
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Portuguese Version: validity and metrics for the older adult population.简要恢复力量表(BRS)葡萄牙文版本:老年人群的有效性和度量。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Aug;25(8):1554-1563. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1753015. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the traditional Chinese version of the resilience Scale-14 and assessment of resilience in Hong Kong adolescents.中文版韧性量表 14 条目的心理计量学评估及香港青少年韧性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 19;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01285-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the network structure and gender/age differences of psychological safety among urban residents: network analysis based on a large sample.城市居民心理安全感的网络结构及性别/年龄差异研究:基于大样本的网络分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02401-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Resilience and depressive symptoms in inpatients with depression: A cross-lagged panel model.抑郁症住院患者的心理弹性与抑郁症状:交叉滞后模型
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Oct 27. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2926.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Brief Resilience Scale.韩国版简易复原力量表的信度与效度
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Nov 30;21(4):732-741. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1049. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Translation and population-based validation of the Arabic version of the brief resilience scale.简短韧性量表阿拉伯文版的翻译及基于人群的验证。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2230887. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2230887.
4
Trajectories of resilience and mental distress to global major disruptions.韧性和精神困扰在全球重大干扰下的变化轨迹。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Dec;26(12):1171-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.017. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
5
Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data.横断面数据中心理网络分析的报告标准。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):806-824. doi: 10.1037/met0000471. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
The Frequent Stressor and Mental Health Monitoring-Paradigm: A Proposal for the Operationalization and Measurement of Resilience and the Identification of Resilience Processes in Longitudinal Observational Studies.频繁应激源与心理健康监测范式:关于在纵向观察研究中对复原力进行操作化和测量以及识别复原力过程的建议。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:710493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710493. eCollection 2021.
7
The resilience paradox.复原力悖论
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 30;12(1):1942642. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1942642. eCollection 2021.
8
How Czecho-Slovakia Bounces Back: Population-Based Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in Two Central European Countries.捷克斯洛伐克如何反弹:两个中欧国家基于人口的简要恢复力量表的验证。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2807-2827. doi: 10.1177/00332941211029619. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.《简要韧性量表(BRS)的因子结构、内部信度和建构效度:一项针对社区中严重精神疾病患者的研究》
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):620-645. doi: 10.1111/papt.12336. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
Comprehensive meta-analysis of resilience interventions.韧性干预措施的综合荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101919. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101919. Epub 2020 Sep 12.