来自德国普通人群的简短恢复力量表（BRS）的新常模值，以及新的 COVID-19 后数据。
New norm values of the brief resilience scale (BRS) from the German general population with new post-COVID-19 data.
机构信息
Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
出版信息
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;12(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01995-0.
BACKGROUND
The concept of psychological resilience has spurred extensive research across various fields, with the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) emerging as a concise tool to measure an individual's ability to rebound from stress. It has been translated into multiple languages, including German, but the validation of the German version occurred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine new norm values and psychometric properties of the BRS.
METHODS
Norm values, the factor structure, reliability and validity of the BRS were examined using data from a representative survey of the German general population (N = 2522).
RESULTS
The results indicated that the method-factor model showed the best fit, suggesting a nuanced understanding of resilience beyond a single-factor approach. The BRS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity based on both latent and manifest correlations. Moreover, the study revealed increasing postpandemic resilience scores.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study provide support for the psychometric reliability and validity of the German version of the BRS after the COVID-19 pandemic and underscore the importance of assessing resilience amidst evolving societal challenges and highlight the need for further exploration in diverse populations.
背景
心理弹性的概念在各个领域引发了广泛的研究，而《简明韧性量表》（BRS）作为一种衡量个体从压力中恢复能力的简洁工具应运而生。它已经被翻译成多种语言，包括德语，但德语版本的验证是在 COVID-19 大流行之前进行的。因此，本研究的主要目的是检验 BRS 的新常模值和心理测量学特性。
方法
使用德国普通人群代表性调查的数据（N=2522），对 BRS 的常模值、因子结构、信度和效度进行了检验。
结果
结果表明，方法因素模型具有最佳的拟合度，表明对韧性的理解不仅仅局限于单一因素的方法，而是更加细致入微。基于潜在和显在相关性，BRS 表现出了良好的聚合和区分效度。此外，研究还揭示了大流行后韧性评分的增加。
结论
本研究结果为 COVID-19 大流行后德国版 BRS 的心理测量学可靠性和有效性提供了支持，并强调了在不断变化的社会挑战中评估韧性的重要性，突出了在不同人群中进一步探索的必要性。
Zotero 插件