Department of Hospital Infection Management/Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology/Hebei Technology Innovation Center of Oral Health, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, PR China.
Department of Pharmacy/Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology/Hebei Technology Innovation Center of Oral Health,School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, PR China.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04885-4.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various cleaning methods in reducing airborne endotoxin and microbial aerosols during oral cleaning procedures.
Forty patients undergoing oral cleaning procedures were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 10 per group). Group A received strong suction alone; Group B received strong suction combined with an air disinfection machine; Group C received strong suction combined with a dental electric suction machine; Group D received strong suction in conjunction with both an air disinfection machine and a dental electric suction machine. Airborne aerosol concentrations were assessed at four-time points: before treatment, 30 min into treatment, immediately after treatment, and 60 min after treatment ended. Samples were collected at distances of 20 cm, 60 cm, and 1 m from the patient's oral cavity using the natural sedimentation method. T-test was used to evaluate the difference among tested groups.
Airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols levels increased significantly during treatment, with the highest levels observed at 20 cm from the patient's mouth. During treatment, groups with additional cleaning methods (Groups B, C, and D) exhibited higher levels of airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols compared to Group A (strong suction alone). However, post-treatment analysis revealed that Group D demonstrated the lowest level of airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols, while Group A exhibited the highest.
Implementing effective aerosol management strategies can significantly reduce aerosol dispersion in the oral clinical environment. Continuous monitoring aerosol concentrations and the application of appropriate control measures are essential for minimizing infection risks for both patients and healthcare providers during oral cleaning procedures.
本研究旨在评估不同清洁方法在减少口腔清洁过程中空气传播内毒素和微生物气溶胶方面的效果。
40 名接受口腔清洁程序的患者被随机分配到四组中的一组(每组 n=10)。A 组仅接受强吸力;B 组接受强吸力联合空气消毒机;C 组接受强吸力联合牙科电动抽吸器;D 组接受强吸力联合空气消毒机和牙科电动抽吸器。在治疗前、治疗 30 分钟、治疗结束后立即和治疗结束后 60 分钟四个时间点评估空气传播气溶胶浓度。使用自然沉降法在距患者口腔 20cm、60cm 和 1m 处采集样本。使用 t 检验评估测试组之间的差异。
在治疗过程中,空气传播内毒素和微生物气溶胶水平显著增加,在距患者口腔 20cm 处观察到最高水平。在治疗期间,使用附加清洁方法的组(B、C 和 D 组)与 A 组(单独强吸力)相比,空气传播内毒素和微生物气溶胶水平更高。然而,治疗后分析显示,D 组空气传播内毒素和微生物气溶胶水平最低,而 A 组水平最高。
实施有效的气溶胶管理策略可以显著减少口腔临床环境中的气溶胶扩散。持续监测气溶胶浓度并应用适当的控制措施对于降低口腔清洁过程中患者和医护人员的感染风险至关重要。