Suppr超能文献

泰国外科住院医师培训项目的 MCQs 考试成绩:医学院与公共卫生为基础的培训机构之间的关系。

MCQs in-training examination scores of the surgical residency program in Thailand: the relationship between medical school vs public health-based training institutions.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Training and Examination Board of Certification in Fellowship of Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06063-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims at investigating and evaluating the categorical knowledge of residency using an internet-based examination.

METHODS

All in-training examinees from 32 Thailand's general surgery residency training institutions participating in the online examination. One hundred fifty Multiple Choice questions (MCQs) were selected for this examination from a pool of previous MCQs used for board certification examinations. Baseline chracteristic of the examinee including residency year, training institution (medical schools and public health-based training institutions), regional-based area of the institution, overall test score, scoring by subcategory, total time to complete the examination, and the length of accredited as a training centre time were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Total 613 examinees. The mean total score of 1st and 3rd year residency of a public health hospital institution differed from those with medical school-based training. On average, the scores in 4 out of 10 categories of residency from medical school training institutions were higher. However, residency from institutions with over 7 years of experience tended to score higher in the Liver, Biliary and Pancreas category.

CONCLUSIONS

The average scores of MCQs exams which reflect the medical knowledge for general surgical residency training at medical schools do not significantly differ from those of individuals undergoing public health training. Additionally, the mean scores of MCQs exams did not differ between high-experience training institutions and recent accredited training centers.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过网络考试调查和评估住院医师的分类知识。

方法

参与在线考试的来自 32 家泰国普通外科住院医师培训机构的所有在培考生。从之前用于董事会认证考试的 MCQ 题库中为本次考试挑选了 150 道多项选择题(MCQ)。考生的基本特征包括住院医师年限、培训机构(医学院和公共卫生培训机构)、机构所在地区、总体考试成绩、分项评分、完成考试的总时间和培训中心认证时间长度,并进行了收集和分析。

结果

共有 613 名考生。公立医院的第一年和第三年住院医师的平均总分与医学院培训的考生不同。平均而言,医学院培训的机构中有 4 个类别的住院医师得分高于其他机构。然而,在肝脏、胆道和胰腺类别方面,具有 7 年以上经验的机构的住院医师得分往往更高。

结论

反映医学院普通外科住院医师培训的 MCQ 考试的平均分数与接受公共卫生培训的个人没有显著差异。此外,高经验培训机构和最近认证的培训中心之间的 MCQ 考试平均分数没有差异。

相似文献

3
SCORE-Based Simulated ABSITE Exam Performance as a Predictor of Performance on the ABSITE.
J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
Effect of Process Changes in Surgical Training on Quantitative Outcomes From Surgery Residency Programs.
J Surg Educ. 2016 Sep-Oct;73(5):807-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Achievement in surgical residency: are objective measures of performance associated with awards received in final years of training?
J Surg Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;71(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
7
Predicting academic performance in surgical training.
J Surg Educ. 2015 May-Jun;72(3):491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.11.013. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
A Comparison of Objective Assessment Data for the United States and International Medical Graduates in a General Surgery Residency.
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Prepare for the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE): A Systematic Review.
J Surg Educ. 2022 Jan-Feb;79(1):216-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
2
A Systematic Review of the Relationship Between In-Training Examination Scores and Specialty Board Examination Scores.
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Feb;13(1):43-57. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00111.1. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
Predictors of performance on the pediatric board certification examination.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02515-z.
5
Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17.
6
Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 2;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0564-x.
7
For multiple choice questions.
Med Teach. 1979;1(1):37-42. doi: 10.3109/01421597909010580.
8
Assessment methods in surgical training in the United Kingdom.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013;10:2. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.2. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
Predicting success on the certification examinations of the American Board of Anesthesiology.
Anesthesiology. 2010 Jan;112(1):212-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c62e2f.
10
Multiple choice questions: their value as an assessment tool.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001 Dec;14(6):661-6. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200112000-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验