Suppr超能文献

定性反思性主题分析在听力保健中的创新和监管。

A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of innovation and regulation in hearing health care.

机构信息

Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03627-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hearing health sector is an example of a health sector that is experiencing a period of rapid innovation driven by digital technologies. These innovations will impact the types of interventions and services available to support the communication of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. This study explored the perceptions of informed participants on the topic of innovation and regulation within hearing healthcare in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

Participants (N = 29, Australia [n = 16], UK [n = 13]) were purposively sampled and joined one of two online workshops. Participants included adults with hearing loss and family members, hearing health professionals, academics/researchers, representatives of hearing device manufacturers, regulators and policymakers. Workshop data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants conceptualised the hearing health sector as a network of organisations and individuals with different roles, knowledge and interests, in a state of flux driven by innovation and regulation. Innovation and regulation were perceived as mechanisms to ensure quality and mitigate risk within a holistic approach to care. Innovations encompassed technological as well as non-technological innovations of potential benefit to consumers. Participants agreed it was essential for innovation and regulation to be congruent with societal values. Critical to ethical congruence was the involvement of consumers throughout both innovation and regulation stages, and the use of innovation and regulation to tackle stigma and reduce health disparities. Participants expressed the desire for accessible and inclusive innovation in the context of fair, transparent and trustworthy commercial practices.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explored how stakeholders within the hearing health sector understand and make sense of innovation and the role of regulation. Overall, and despite reservations relating to health care professionals' changing roles and responsibilities, innovation and regulation were conceptualised as beneficial when situated in the context of holistic, whole-person, models of care. The results of this study will inform considerations to support the development and implementation of innovations and regulation within the hearing sector and across other health sectors influenced by technological advances.

摘要

背景

听力健康领域是一个受益于数字技术创新驱动的健康领域范例。这些创新将影响到可用于支持聋人和重听人士交流的干预措施和服务类型。本研究探讨了澳大利亚和英国(英国)听力保健领域内创新和监管议题的知情参与者的看法。

方法

参与者(N=29,澳大利亚[n=16],英国[n=13])采用目的性抽样,参加了两个在线研讨会中的一个。参与者包括听力损失者及其家属、听力保健专业人员、学者/研究人员、听力设备制造商代表、监管机构和政策制定者。使用反思性主题分析对工作坊数据进行分析。

结果

参与者将听力保健部门概念化为一个由具有不同角色、知识和利益的组织和个人组成的网络,在创新和监管驱动的不断变化的状态中。创新和监管被视为在整体护理方法中确保质量和降低风险的机制。创新包括对消费者具有潜在益处的技术和非技术创新。参与者一致认为,创新和监管必须与社会价值观保持一致。道德一致性的关键是在创新和监管的各个阶段让消费者参与进来,并利用创新和监管来解决污名化问题,减少健康差距。参与者表示希望在公平、透明和值得信赖的商业实践背景下实现可及和包容的创新。

结论

本研究探讨了听力保健部门内的利益相关者如何理解和理解创新以及监管的作用。总的来说,尽管与医疗保健专业人员不断变化的角色和责任有关,但当创新和监管置于整体、全人护理模式的背景下时,它们被认为是有益的。本研究的结果将为支持听力保健领域和受技术进步影响的其他保健领域内创新和监管的制定和实施提供信息。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.关于听力对生活质量影响的定性系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5. Epub 2024 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

5
Virtual hospitals: The future of the healthcare system? An expert consensus.虚拟医院:医疗系统的未来?专家共识
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jan;31(1):121-133. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231173006. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Disruptions to the hearing health sector.听力健康领域的混乱局面。
Nat Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):19-21. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02086-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验