• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of innovation and regulation in hearing health care.定性反思性主题分析在听力保健中的创新和监管。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03627-1.
2
Unlocking data: Decision-maker perspectives on cross-sectoral data sharing and linkage as part of a whole-systems approach to public health policy and practice.解锁数据:决策者对跨部门数据共享与关联的看法,这是公共卫生政策与实践全系统方法的一部分。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov 20:1-30. doi: 10.3310/KYTW2173.
3
Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions and perspectives on digital health inequalities in cardiometabolic care: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对数字健康干预措施的态度以及对心脏代谢护理中数字健康不平等问题的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e091018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091018.
4
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
5
Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study.利用信息和通信技术支持卫生部门有效工作实践创新的多地点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 8;9:201. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-201.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.关于听力对生活质量影响的定性系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
8
Qualitative, multimethod study of behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation from the patient and healthcare professional perspective in Australia and the UK: study protocol.从患者和医疗保健专业人员角度对澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入行为和态度反应的定性多方法研究:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 29;8(5):e019623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019623.
9
Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team.针对患有多种慢性病患者的服务创新:一个快速评估团队的思考
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(15):1-76. doi: 10.3310/PTRU7108.
10
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.解锁电子健康专业人员的职业发展路径:以海湾合作委员会国家为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
An International Competency Framework for High-Quality Workforce Development in Integrated Care (IC): A Modified Delphi Study Among Global Participants.综合照护领域高质量劳动力发展的国际能力框架:一项针对全球参与者的改良德尔菲研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Apr 29;24(2):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8258. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
2
AAV1-hOTOF gene therapy for autosomal recessive deafness 9: a single-arm trial.AAV1-hOTOF 基因治疗常染色体隐性遗传性耳聋 9 型:一项单臂试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 25;403(10441):2317-2325. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02874-X. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
The Modern Hearing Care Landscape: Toward the Provision of Personalized, Dynamic, and Adaptive Care.现代听力保健全景:迈向个性化、动态化和适应性护理的提供。
Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 6;44(3):261-273. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769621. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
The Self-Stigma of Hearing Loss in Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.成人和老年人听力损失的自我污名化:系统评价。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(6):1301-1310. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001398. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Virtual hospitals: The future of the healthcare system? An expert consensus.虚拟医院:医疗系统的未来?专家共识
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jan;31(1):121-133. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231173006. Epub 2023 May 24.
6
The NDIS at ten years: designing an equitable scheme for the next decade.十年后的国家残疾保险计划:为下一个十年设计一个公平的方案。
Med J Aust. 2023 Apr 17;218(7):291-294. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51899. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
7
Disruptions to the hearing health sector.听力健康领域的混乱局面。
Nat Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):19-21. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02086-6.
8
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Aural Rehabilitation for Adults With Hearing Loss.美国言语语言听力协会成人听力损失听觉康复临床实践指南。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Mar;32(1):1-51. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00252. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
9
The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature.数字健康干预措施的成本效益:文献系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;10:787135. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.787135. eCollection 2022.
10
Connected Hearing Devices and Audiologists: The User-Centered Development of Digital Service Innovations.联网听力设备与听力学家:以用户为中心的数字服务创新发展
Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 20;3:739370. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.739370. eCollection 2021.

定性反思性主题分析在听力保健中的创新和监管。

A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of innovation and regulation in hearing health care.

机构信息

Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03627-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03627-1
PMID:39334196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11438185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hearing health sector is an example of a health sector that is experiencing a period of rapid innovation driven by digital technologies. These innovations will impact the types of interventions and services available to support the communication of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. This study explored the perceptions of informed participants on the topic of innovation and regulation within hearing healthcare in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

Participants (N = 29, Australia [n = 16], UK [n = 13]) were purposively sampled and joined one of two online workshops. Participants included adults with hearing loss and family members, hearing health professionals, academics/researchers, representatives of hearing device manufacturers, regulators and policymakers. Workshop data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants conceptualised the hearing health sector as a network of organisations and individuals with different roles, knowledge and interests, in a state of flux driven by innovation and regulation. Innovation and regulation were perceived as mechanisms to ensure quality and mitigate risk within a holistic approach to care. Innovations encompassed technological as well as non-technological innovations of potential benefit to consumers. Participants agreed it was essential for innovation and regulation to be congruent with societal values. Critical to ethical congruence was the involvement of consumers throughout both innovation and regulation stages, and the use of innovation and regulation to tackle stigma and reduce health disparities. Participants expressed the desire for accessible and inclusive innovation in the context of fair, transparent and trustworthy commercial practices.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explored how stakeholders within the hearing health sector understand and make sense of innovation and the role of regulation. Overall, and despite reservations relating to health care professionals' changing roles and responsibilities, innovation and regulation were conceptualised as beneficial when situated in the context of holistic, whole-person, models of care. The results of this study will inform considerations to support the development and implementation of innovations and regulation within the hearing sector and across other health sectors influenced by technological advances.

摘要

背景

听力健康领域是一个受益于数字技术创新驱动的健康领域范例。这些创新将影响到可用于支持聋人和重听人士交流的干预措施和服务类型。本研究探讨了澳大利亚和英国(英国)听力保健领域内创新和监管议题的知情参与者的看法。

方法

参与者(N=29,澳大利亚[n=16],英国[n=13])采用目的性抽样,参加了两个在线研讨会中的一个。参与者包括听力损失者及其家属、听力保健专业人员、学者/研究人员、听力设备制造商代表、监管机构和政策制定者。使用反思性主题分析对工作坊数据进行分析。

结果

参与者将听力保健部门概念化为一个由具有不同角色、知识和利益的组织和个人组成的网络,在创新和监管驱动的不断变化的状态中。创新和监管被视为在整体护理方法中确保质量和降低风险的机制。创新包括对消费者具有潜在益处的技术和非技术创新。参与者一致认为,创新和监管必须与社会价值观保持一致。道德一致性的关键是在创新和监管的各个阶段让消费者参与进来,并利用创新和监管来解决污名化问题,减少健康差距。参与者表示希望在公平、透明和值得信赖的商业实践背景下实现可及和包容的创新。

结论

本研究探讨了听力保健部门内的利益相关者如何理解和理解创新以及监管的作用。总的来说,尽管与医疗保健专业人员不断变化的角色和责任有关,但当创新和监管置于整体、全人护理模式的背景下时,它们被认为是有益的。本研究的结果将为支持听力保健领域和受技术进步影响的其他保健领域内创新和监管的制定和实施提供信息。