Pacific Community, SPC, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji.
Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Sep 27;13(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01447-9.
Comprehensive infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes are proven to reduce the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, published assessments of IPC programmes against the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Core Components in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) at the national and acute healthcare facility level are currently unavailable.
From January 2022 to April 2023, a multi-country, cross-sectional study was conducted in PICTs. The self reporting survey was based on the WHO Infection Prevention Assessment Framework (IPCAF) that supports implementing the minimum requirements of the WHO eight core components of IPC programmes at both the national and facility level. The results were presented as a 'traffic light' (present, in progress, not present) matrix. Each PICT's overall status in achieving IPC core components was summarised using descriptive statistics.
Fifteen PICTs participated in this study. Ten (67%) PICTs had national IPC programmes, supported mainly by IPC focal points (87%, n = 13), updated national IPC guidelines (80%, n = 12), IPC monitoring and feedback mechanisms (80%, n = 12), and waste management plans (87%, n = 13). Significant gaps were identified in education and training (20%, n = 3). Despite being a defined component in 67% (n = 10) of national IPC programmes, HAI surveillance and monitoring was the lowest scoring core component (13%, n = 2). National and facility level IPC guidelines had been adapted and implemented in 67% (n = 10) PICTs; however, only 40% (n = 6) of PICTs had a dedicated IPC budget, 40% (n = 6) had multimodal strategies for IPC, and 33% (n = 5) had daily environmental cleaning records.
Identifying IPC strengths, gaps, and challenges across PICTs will inform future IPC programme priorities and contribute to regional efforts in strengthening IPC capacity. This will promote global public health through the prevention of HAIs and AMR.
综合感染预防和控制 (IPC) 方案已被证明可减少医疗机构相关感染 (HAI) 和抗生素耐药性 (AMR) 的传播。然而,目前尚无关于太平洋岛国和地区 (PICT) 国家和急性医疗机构层面的世界卫生组织 (WHO) IPC 核心组件的 IPC 方案的已发表评估。
2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月,在 PICT 进行了一项多国、横断面研究。自我报告调查基于世界卫生组织感染预防评估框架 (IPCAF),该框架支持在国家和医疗机构层面实施 IPC 方案的最低要求的 WHO 八项核心组件。结果以“交通灯”(存在、进行中、不存在)矩阵呈现。使用描述性统计方法总结每个 PICT 在实现 IPC 核心组件方面的总体状况。
15 个 PICT 参与了这项研究。10 个(67%)PICT 有国家 IPC 方案,主要由 IPC 协调人(87%,n=13)、更新的国家 IPC 指南(80%,n=12)、IPC 监测和反馈机制(80%,n=12)和废物管理计划(87%,n=13)支持。在教育和培训方面存在明显差距(20%,n=3)。尽管在 67%(n=10)的国家 IPC 方案中明确规定了 HAI 监测,但该监测是得分最低的核心组件(13%,n=2)。67%(n=10)的 PICT 已改编和实施了国家和医疗机构层面的 IPC 指南;然而,只有 40%(n=6)的 PICT 有专门的 IPC 预算,40%(n=6)有 IPC 的多模式策略,33%(n=5)有日常环境清洁记录。
确定 PICT 中的 IPC 优势、差距和挑战将为未来的 IPC 方案重点提供信息,并为加强 IPC 能力的区域努力做出贡献。这将通过预防 HAI 和 AMR 来促进全球公共卫生。