Center for Health Policy on Resilience System and Resource, Health Policy Agency, Ministry of Health of Indonesia, Percetakan Negara 23, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Feb 3;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01211-5.
Infection prevention and control (IPC) in hospitals is key to safe patient care. There is currently no data regarding the implementation of IPC in hospitals in Indonesia. The aim of this study was to assess the existing IPC level in a nationwide survey, using the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC assessment framework tool (IPCAF), and to identify strengths, gaps, and challenges.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to November 2021. Of all general hospitals in Indonesia, 20% (N = 475) were selected using stratified random sampling based on class (A, B, C and D; class D with a maximum of 50 beds and class A with ≥ 250 beds) and region. The IPCAF was translated into Indonesian and tested in four hospitals. Questions were added regarding challenges in the implementation of IPC. Quantitative IPCAF scores are reported as median (minimum-maximum). IPC levels were calculated according to WHO tools.
In total, 355 hospitals (74.7%) participated in this study. The overall median IPCAF score was 620.0 (535.0-687.5). The level of IPC was mostly assessed as advanced (56.9% of hospitals), followed by intermediate (35.8%), basic (7.0%) and inadequate (0.3%). In the eastern region of the country, the majority of hospitals scored intermediate level. Of the eight core components, the one with the highest score was IPC guidelines. Almost all hospitals had guidelines on the most important topics, including hand hygiene. Core components with the lowest score were surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), education and training, and multimodal strategies. Although > 90% of hospitals indicated that surveillance of HAIs was performed, 57.2% reported no availability of adequate microbiology laboratory capacity to support HAIs surveillance. The most frequently reported challenges in the implementation of IPC were communication with the management of the hospitals, followed by the unavailability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results and insufficient staffing of full-time IPC nurses.
The IPC level in the majority of Indonesian hospitals was assessed as advanced, but there was no even distribution over the country. The IPCAF in combination with interviews identified several priority areas for interventions to improve IPC in Indonesian hospitals.
医院感染预防和控制(IPC)是安全患者护理的关键。目前,印度尼西亚医院的 IPC 实施情况尚无数据。本研究的目的是使用世界卫生组织(WHO)IPC 评估框架工具(IPCAF)评估全国范围内的现有 IPC 水平,并确定优势、差距和挑战。
这是一项横断面研究,于 2021 年 7 月至 11 月进行。采用分层随机抽样方法,从印度尼西亚所有综合医院中抽取 20%(N=475),依据类别(A、B、C 和 D;D 类最大 50 张床位,A 类≥250 张床位)和地区进行分层。将 IPCAF 翻译成印度尼西亚语,并在四家医院进行了测试。添加了有关 IPC 实施挑战的问题。定量 IPCAF 评分以中位数(最小值-最大值)报告。根据 WHO 工具计算 IPC 水平。
共有 355 家医院(74.7%)参与了本研究。总体 IPCAF 评分中位数为 620.0(535.0-687.5)。IPC 水平主要评估为高级(56.9%的医院),其次是中级(35.8%)、基础(7.0%)和不足(0.3%)。在该国东部地区,大多数医院的得分都为中级。在八项核心组成部分中,得分最高的是 IPC 指南。几乎所有医院都有关于最重要主题的指南,包括手卫生。得分最低的核心组成部分是医疗保健相关性感染(HAI)监测、教育和培训以及多模式策略。尽管超过 90%的医院表示已开展 HAI 监测,但 57.2%的医院报告缺乏足够的微生物学实验室能力来支持 HAI 监测。在实施 IPC 过程中,报告最频繁的挑战是与医院管理层沟通,其次是无法获得抗菌药物敏感性测试结果和全职 IPC 护士人员配备不足。
大多数印度尼西亚医院的 IPC 水平被评估为高级,但全国范围内分布不均。IPC 评估框架工具(IPCAF)与访谈相结合,确定了印度尼西亚医院改善 IPC 的几个优先干预领域。