McGuinness Amelia J, O'Hely Martin, Stupart Douglas, Watters David, Dawson Samantha L, Hair Christopher, Berk Michael, Mohebbi Mohammadreza, Loughman Amy, Guest Glenn, Jacka Felice N
The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 23;12(9):1938. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091938.
Emerging evidence suggests that the human vermiform appendix is not a vestigial organ but rather an immunological organ of biological relevance. It is hypothesised that the appendix acts as a bacterial 'safe house' for commensal gut bacteria and facilitates re-inoculation of the colon after disruption through the release of biofilms. To date, no studies have attempted to explore this potential mechanistic function of the appendix. We conducted a pre-post intervention study in adults (n = 59) exploring re-establishment of the gut microbiota in those with and without an appendix after colonic disruption via bowel preparation and colonoscopy. Gut microbiota composition was measured one week before and one month after bowel preparation and colonoscopy using 16S rRNA sequencing. We observed between group differences in gut microbiota composition between those with (n = 45) and without (n = 13) an appendix at baseline. These differences were no longer evident one-month post-procedure, suggesting that this procedure may have 'reset' any potential appendix-related differences between groups. Both groups experienced reductions in gut microbiota richness and shifts in beta diversity post-procedure, with greater changes in those without an appendix, and there were five bacterial genera whose re-establishment post-procedure appeared to be moderated by appendicectomy status. This small experimental study provides preliminary evidence of a potential differential re-establishment of the gut microbiota after disruption in those with and without an appendix, warranting further investigation into the potential role of the appendix as a microbial safe house.
新出现的证据表明,人类阑尾并非退化器官,而是具有生物学意义的免疫器官。据推测,阑尾充当共生肠道细菌的细菌“安全屋”,并通过生物膜的释放促进结肠在受到破坏后的重新定植。迄今为止,尚无研究试图探索阑尾的这种潜在机制功能。我们对成年人(n = 59)进行了一项干预前后研究,探讨在通过肠道准备和结肠镜检查导致结肠破坏后,有阑尾和无阑尾的人群中肠道微生物群的重新建立情况。在肠道准备和结肠镜检查前一周及检查后一个月,使用16S rRNA测序测量肠道微生物群组成。我们观察到,在基线时,有阑尾(n = 45)和无阑尾(n = 13)的人群之间肠道微生物群组成存在组间差异。这些差异在术后一个月不再明显,这表明该手术可能“重置”了两组之间任何潜在的与阑尾相关的差异。两组在术后肠道微生物群丰富度均降低,β多样性发生变化,无阑尾者变化更大,并且有五个细菌属在术后的重新建立似乎受阑尾切除状态的影响。这项小型实验研究提供了初步证据,表明在结肠破坏后,有阑尾和无阑尾的人群中肠道微生物群可能存在不同的重新建立情况,这值得进一步研究阑尾作为微生物安全屋的潜在作用。