• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在结肠胶囊内镜中对标志点和弯曲度的识别的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver agreement on landmark and flexure identification in colon capsule endoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Baagoes Alle 31, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02789-z. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-023-02789-z
PMID:37036637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10638147/
Abstract

PURPOSE

When an optical colonoscopy is carried out, Scope Guide can assist the endoscopist in determining the localization. In colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), this support is not available. To our knowledge, the interobserver agreement on landmark identification has never been studied. This study aims to investigate the interobserver agreement on landmark identification in CCE.

METHODS

An interobserver study was carried out comparing the landmark identification (the ileocecal valve, hepatic flexure, splenic flexure, and anus) in CCE investigations between an external private contractor and three in-house CCE readers with different levels of experience. All CCE investigations analyzed in this study were carried out as a part of the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer. Patients were between 50 and 74 years old with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT). A random sample of 20 CCE investigations was taken from the total sample of more than 800 videos.

RESULTS

Overall interobserver agreement on all landmarks was 51%. Interobserver agreement on the first cecal image (ileocecal valve), hepatic flexure, splenic flexure, and last rectal image (anus) was 72%, 29%, 22%, and 83%, respectively. The overall interobserver agreement, including only examinations with adequate bowel preparation (n = 16), was 54%, and for individual landmarks, 73%, 32%, 24%, and 85%.

CONCLUSION

Overall interobserver agreement on all four landmarks from CCE was poor. Measures are needed to improve landmark identification in CCE investigations. Artificial intelligence could be a possible solution to this problem.

摘要

目的

在进行光学结肠镜检查时,Scope Guide 可以帮助内镜医生确定定位。在结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)中,无法提供这种支持。据我们所知,尚未研究过关于地标识别的观察者间一致性。本研究旨在调查 CCE 中地标识别的观察者间一致性。

方法

进行了一项观察者间研究,比较了外部私人承包商和三位具有不同经验水平的内部 CCE 读者在 CCE 检查中对地标(回盲瓣、肝曲、脾曲和肛门)的识别,这是丹麦结直肠癌筛查计划的一部分。患者年龄在 50 至 74 岁之间,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阳性。从超过 800 个视频的总样本中随机抽取了 20 个 CCE 检查。

结果

所有地标总体观察者间一致性为 51%。对第一盲肠图像(回盲瓣)、肝曲、脾曲和最后直肠图像(肛门)的观察者间一致性分别为 72%、29%、22%和 83%。包括仅有充分肠道准备的检查(n=16)在内的总体观察者间一致性为 54%,而对于个别地标,分别为 73%、32%、24%和 85%。

结论

CCE 中所有四个地标总体观察者间一致性较差。需要采取措施来改善 CCE 检查中的地标识别。人工智能可能是解决这个问题的一种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/40434325739e/10151_2023_2789_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/7d434ee869a6/10151_2023_2789_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/6cdc5bc3fcb1/10151_2023_2789_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/40434325739e/10151_2023_2789_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/7d434ee869a6/10151_2023_2789_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/6cdc5bc3fcb1/10151_2023_2789_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f7/10638147/40434325739e/10151_2023_2789_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Interobserver agreement on landmark and flexure identification in colon capsule endoscopy.在结肠胶囊内镜中对标志点和弯曲度的识别的观察者间一致性。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02789-z. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
PillCamColon Capsule for the study of colonic pathology in clinical practice. Study of agreement with colonoscopy.PillCamColon 胶囊用于临床实践中结肠病理学的研究。研究与结肠镜检查的一致性。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 Feb;103(2):69-75. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082011000200004.
3
Feasibility of a colon capsule overnight procedure followed by colonoscopy.结肠胶囊过夜检查后行结肠镜检查的可行性。
Z Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;54(2):146-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-106595. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
4
Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice.结肠 PillCam 胶囊内镜检查是否适用于结直肠癌筛查?一项社区胃肠病学实践中的前瞻性可行性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):848-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.163. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
Screening individuals' experiences of colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy; a mixed methods study.筛查个体结肠镜检查和结肠胶囊内镜检查的体验:一项混合方法研究。
Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S71-S76. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1581372. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Colon capsule endoscopy as possible filter test for colonoscopy selection in a screening population with positive fecal immunology.在粪便免疫检测呈阳性的筛查人群中,结肠胶囊内镜检查可作为结肠镜检查选择的可能筛选试验。
Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):473-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365402. Epub 2014 May 13.
7
Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.结直肠肿瘤筛查中胶囊结肠镜检查:系统评价。
Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):815-824. doi: 10.1055/a-1308-1297. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
A prospective study on second-generation colon capsule endoscopy to detect mucosal lesions and disease activity in ulcerative colitis (with video).前瞻性研究第二代结肠胶囊内镜检测溃疡性结肠炎的黏膜病变和疾病活动(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):1139-1146.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Multicenter, randomized study to optimize bowel preparation for colon capsule endoscopy.多中心、随机化研究以优化结肠胶囊内镜的肠道准备。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 28;23(48):8615-8625. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8615.
10
Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial-the VICOCA study.粪便免疫化学检测阳性的结直肠癌筛查对象中结肠镜与 CT 结肠成像的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验——VICOCA 研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Sep 18;18(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards full integration of explainable artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy's pathway.迈向可解释人工智能在结肠胶囊内镜检查流程中的全面整合。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89648-z.
2
Polyp Matching in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Pioneering CCE-Colonoscopy Integration Towards an AI-Driven Future.结肠胶囊内镜中的息肉匹配:开创CCE与结肠镜检查的整合,迈向人工智能驱动的未来。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237034.
3
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015.结肠镜胶囊内镜在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:随机对照试验CareForColon2015的中期分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1712-E1719. doi: 10.1055/a-1546-8727. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences for Colon Capsule Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.患者报告的结肠胶囊内镜检查和结肠镜检查的结果与偏好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 20;11(9):1730. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091730.
3
Artificial intelligence for the detection of polyps or cancer with colon capsule endoscopy.
结肠胶囊内镜在炎症性肠病中的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(18):2056. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182056.
4
Rationalizing polyp matching criteria in colon capsule endoscopy: an international expert consensus through RAND (modified DELPHI) process.优化结肠胶囊内镜检查中的息肉匹配标准:通过兰德(改良德尔菲)法达成的国际专家共识
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 12;17:17562848241242681. doi: 10.1177/17562848241242681. eCollection 2024.
用于结肠胶囊内镜检查中息肉或癌症检测的人工智能
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jun 13;14:26317745211020277. doi: 10.1177/26317745211020277. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Feature Point Tracking-Based Localization of Colon Capsule Endoscope.基于特征点跟踪的结肠胶囊内镜定位
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;11(2):193. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020193.
5
Capsule endoscopy - Recent developments and future directions.胶囊内镜检查——最新进展与未来方向。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;15(2):127-137. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1840351. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for polyp detection: systematic review and meta-analyses.胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查诊断息肉的准确性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2021 Jul;53(7):713-721. doi: 10.1055/a-1249-3938. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.结肠镜筛查结直肠癌:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000411.
8
Novel experimental and software methods for image reconstruction and localization in capsule endoscopy.胶囊内镜图像重建与定位的新型实验方法和软件方法。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Feb;6(2):E205-E210. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121882. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌的术前定位:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2366-2379. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5236-8. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
Computerized 3-dimensional localization of a video capsule in the abdominal cavity: validation by digital radiography.计算机化的视频胶囊在腹腔内的三维定位:数字射线照相术的验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.022. Epub 2014 Jan 11.