• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索刻板印象修正如何介导社会支配与多元文化接纳之间的关系。

Exploring How Stereotype Modification Mediates the Relationship between Social Dominance and Multicultural Acceptance.

作者信息

Lee Sowon, Kim Boyoung

机构信息

College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;14(9):745. doi: 10.3390/bs14090745.

DOI:10.3390/bs14090745
PMID:39335961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429021/
Abstract

This research examines the mediating role of stereotype modification in the relationship between social dominance orientation (SDO) and multicultural acceptance in South Korea's increasingly diverse society. We obtained a sample of 402 participants between the ages of 20 and 65 through an online survey. We used SPSS 26.0 for statistical analyses, including frequency, correlation, and regression analyses. Employing Hayes' Model 4, we examined the mediation effect with a bootstrap sample of 10,000 iterations, determining the significance of the effect with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The results revealed nuanced relationships among the variables, shedding light on the complex dynamics of social cognition and intergroup relationships in the South Korean context. The research concludes that individuals with a higher social dominance orientation tend to have lower acceptance of multiculturalism and are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes toward outgroups. This finding suggests that SDO is a significant factor in integrating and adapting migrants into host societies and can lead to social conflict. The study implies that addressing SDO is crucial for fostering positive attitudes toward multiculturalism and reducing discrimination.

摘要

本研究考察了在韩国日益多元化的社会中,刻板印象修正在社会支配取向(SDO)与多元文化接纳之间关系中所起的中介作用。我们通过在线调查获得了402名年龄在20至65岁之间的参与者样本。我们使用SPSS 26.0进行统计分析,包括频率分析、相关性分析和回归分析。采用海斯模型4,我们通过10000次迭代的自抽样样本检验中介效应,并用95%置信区间(CI)确定效应的显著性。结果揭示了变量之间细微的关系,为韩国背景下社会认知和群体间关系的复杂动态提供了线索。研究得出结论,社会支配取向较高的个体往往对多元文化主义的接纳程度较低,并且更有可能对外群体持有偏见态度。这一发现表明,社会支配取向是影响移民融入东道国社会的一个重要因素,可能导致社会冲突。该研究意味着,解决社会支配取向问题对于培养对多元文化主义的积极态度和减少歧视至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/11429021/03c5af41124c/behavsci-14-00745-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/11429021/03c5af41124c/behavsci-14-00745-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d3/11429021/03c5af41124c/behavsci-14-00745-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring How Stereotype Modification Mediates the Relationship between Social Dominance and Multicultural Acceptance.探索刻板印象修正如何介导社会支配与多元文化接纳之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;14(9):745. doi: 10.3390/bs14090745.
2
Linking parental socialization about discrimination to intergroup attitudes: The role of social dominance orientation and cultural identification.将父母关于歧视的社会化与群体间态度联系起来:社会支配取向和文化认同的作用。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2017 Jul;23(3):435-444. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000140. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.社会支配倾向:重新审视预测社会和政治态度的变量的结构和功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):583-606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
4
Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.社会支配倾向与政治态度之间的相关性反映了共同的遗传基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17741-17746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818711116. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Social dominance orientation as an obstacle to intergroup apology.社会支配倾向是阻碍群体间道歉的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211379. eCollection 2019.
6
Classical and Modern Prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World and Social Dominance Orientation.经典与现代对智力障碍个体的偏见:体验性接触、公正世界信念和社会支配倾向的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 16;21(3):355. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030355.
7
[Effect of Acculturative Stress on Multicultural Adolescents' Life Satisfaction: Sequential Multiple Mediating Effects of Bicultural Acceptance Attitude, Self-Esteem, and Social Withdrawal -Using the 2016 Multicultural Adolescents Panel Study].文化适应压力对多元文化青少年生活满意度的影响:双文化接纳态度、自尊和社交退缩的序列多重中介效应——基于2016年多元文化青少年面板研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Jun;52(3):324-340. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22030.
8
How a terror attack affects right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and their relationship to torture attitudes.恐怖袭击如何影响右翼威权主义、社会支配取向及其与酷刑态度的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Oct;59(5):547-552. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12463. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: a new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors.
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):91-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03206402.
10
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and resilience among students: a structural equation modeling.学生的自我调节、认知灵活性与适应力之间的关系:结构方程建模。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 7;12(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01843-1.
2
Cosmopolitanism and social dominance orientation mediate relationship between political orientation and sexism.世界主义和社会支配倾向在政治取向和性别歧视之间起中介作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Oct;240:104037. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104037. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Consideration of culture in cognition: How we can enrich methodology and theory.
考虑认知中的文化:我们如何丰富方法和理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):914-931. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02227-5. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
The role of social categorization and social dominance orientation in behavioral adaptability.社会分类和社会支配倾向在行为适应性中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):700-713. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000351. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Understanding Whites' perceptions of multicultural policies: A (non)zero-sum framework?理解白人对多元文化政策的看法:(非)零和框架?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 May;120(5):1231-1260. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000315. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Coping with discrimination: The insidious effects of gender minority stigma on depression and anxiety in transgender individuals.应对歧视:跨性别者污名对抑郁和焦虑的隐性影响
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;76(1):176-194. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22865. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
7
Intergroup Contact as an Agent of Cognitive Liberalization.群体间接触作为认知自由化的动因。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;13(5):523-548. doi: 10.1177/1745691617752324. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
8
Individual differences in social dominance orientation predict support for the use of cognitive ability tests.个体在社会支配倾向方面的差异预测了对使用认知能力测试的支持。
J Pers. 2015 Feb;83(1):14-25. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12078. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
9
Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing.多元文化体验通过认知解冻减少群体间偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):750-72. doi: 10.1037/a0029719. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.社会支配倾向:重新审视预测社会和政治态度的变量的结构和功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):583-606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765. Epub 2012 Jan 3.