• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: a new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors.

作者信息

Michinov Nicolas, Dambrun Michaël, Guimond Serge, Méot Alain

机构信息

Université de Poitiers, Département de psychologie, 97 Avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex, France.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):91-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03206402.

DOI:10.3758/bf03206402
PMID:16097348
Abstract

A number of studies have shown that the scale of social dominance orientation (SDO), used to measure the degree of preference for inequality among social groups, is a predictive measure of social and political attitudes toward stigmatized outgroups. However, the relationship between SDO and discrimination has received little attention. The main goal of this study was to assess the validity of a new computer-based method used to measure discriminatory behaviors in a laboratory setting. An additional goal was to test the mediating role of prejudice in the relation between SDO and discrimination. The results provide a first validation of this new method and demonstrate that the effect of SDO on discrimination is mediated by prejudice.

摘要

相似文献

1
Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: a new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors.
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):91-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03206402.
2
Modern racism attitudes among white students: the role of dominance and authoritarianism and the mediating effects of racial color-blindness.白人学生的现代种族主义态度:支配和威权主义的作用以及种族盲视的中介作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov-Dec;152(6):758-74. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.700966.
3
Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.社会支配倾向与政治态度之间的相关性反映了共同的遗传基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17741-17746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818711116. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
Supporting social hierarchy is associated with White police officers' use of force.支持社会等级制度与白人警察使用武力有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 4;118(18). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007693118.
5
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
6
The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: a group dominance perspective.平权行动的积极与消极框架:群体主导视角
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):656-68. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283442.
7
Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.社会支配倾向:重新审视预测社会和政治态度的变量的结构和功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):583-606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
8
Race-status associations: Distinct effects of three novel measures among White and Black perceivers.种族地位关联:白人和黑人感知者中三种新测量方法的不同影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar;120(3):601-625. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000257. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
Perceptions of immigrants: modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation.对移民的认知:改变社会支配取向较高者的态度
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Aug;33(8):1113-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301015. Epub 2007 May 4.
10
The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters.易产生偏见个体的接触获益:被污名化的外群体类型很重要。
J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(1):92-104. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1601608. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
When combining injunctive and descriptive norms strengthens the hypocrisy effect: A test in the field of discrimination.当禁令性规范和描述性规范相结合时会增强伪善效应:一项在歧视领域的测试。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:989599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989599. eCollection 2022.