Reich Nir, Azar Ofer H
Department of Business Administration, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;14(9):786. doi: 10.3390/bs14090786.
We study how the buying purpose affects the trade-off between time and money. We consider the case of buying something for ourselves versus buying a gift and the decision whether to spend time traveling to a cheaper store to save money. We hypothesized that when purchasing a gift, people make less effort to save money, and therefore will be less willing to spend time traveling to a cheaper store when they buy a gift. In experiments with several scenarios, we fail to find support for this hypothesis. We also explore the impact of telling subjects that the purchase is made abroad. This is hypothesized to increase the valuation of the buyer's time. We also hypothesize that the interaction of being abroad and buying a gift will be negative. The data support both hypotheses. Subjects answered 15 questions about their decision-making style (rational, intuitive, and spontaneous). Subjects with more rational decision-making exhibit lower time value, which is likely to be closer to the real one. Subjects with more rational decision-making also show more strongly that time abroad is more valuable. These results suggest that questions about decision-making style are correlated with decision-making in scenarios of realistic purchase decisions.
我们研究购买目的如何影响时间与金钱之间的权衡。我们考虑为自己购买物品与购买礼物的情况,以及是否为省钱花时间前往更便宜的商店的决策。我们假设,购买礼物时,人们省钱的努力会减少,因此购买礼物时不太愿意花时间前往更便宜的商店。在多个场景的实验中,我们未能找到支持这一假设的证据。我们还探究了告知受试者购买行为是在国外进行的影响。这被假设会提高买家对时间的估值。我们还假设在国外且购买礼物这两者的相互作用将是负面的。数据支持这两个假设。受试者回答了15个关于他们决策风格(理性、直觉和自发)的问题。决策更理性的受试者表现出较低的时间价值,这可能更接近实际情况。决策更理性的受试者也更强烈地表明在国外时间更有价值。这些结果表明,关于决策风格的问题与现实购买决策场景中的决策相关。