Suppr超能文献

论行为疲劳在英国新冠疫情封锁辩论中的作用:一项评估能力、机会、动机与行为之间关系的全国性调查的回顾性分析

Considering the Role of Behavioural Fatigue in the COVID-19 Lockdown Debates in Great Britain: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Survey Assessing the Relationships between Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour.

作者信息

Khanal Saval, Schmidtke Kelly Ann, Haralampiev Kaloyan, Vlaev Ivo

机构信息

Health Economics Consulting, University of East Anglia, East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

Liberal Arts, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):852. doi: 10.3390/bs14090852.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the term "behavioural fatigue" became the centre of policy debates in Great Britain. These debates involved deciding when to go into lockdown and whether behavioural interventions could be effective. Behavioural interventions can only succeed where people's Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations to perform target behaviours are supported. Our retrospective data analyses examine the relationships between people's Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivations, and Behaviours, i.e., adherence to lockdown guidelines. Our cross-sectional analyses include 17,962 unique participants in Great Britain who completed a survey over the initial 30 days of the first lockdown (April 2020). We examine trends in responses to each scale and then the relationships between the scales using Granger's causality test with tests for stationarity and cointegration. A mixture of increasing and decreasing trends was identified for Capabilities and Opportunities. Decreasing trends were identified for Motivation and Behaviour. Granger's causality tests found that Capability forecasts Opportunity and Behaviour and that Motivation forecasts Opportunity. The discussion reiterates that to realise and maintain Behaviour changes, policies surrounding people's Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations must continue to support target behaviours.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,“行为疲劳”一词成为英国政策辩论的核心。这些辩论涉及到何时实施封锁以及行为干预措施是否有效。行为干预只有在人们执行目标行为的能力、机会和动机得到支持的情况下才能取得成功。我们的回顾性数据分析考察了人们的能力、机会、动机与行为之间的关系,即对封锁指南的遵守情况。我们的横断面分析包括英国17962名独特的参与者,他们在第一次封锁的最初30天(2020年4月)完成了一项调查。我们考察了对每个量表的回答趋势,然后使用格兰杰因果检验以及平稳性和协整性检验来研究量表之间的关系。能力和机会呈现出上升和下降的混合趋势。动机和行为呈现出下降趋势。格兰杰因果检验发现,能力预测机会和行为,动机预测机会。讨论重申,为了实现并维持行为改变,围绕人们的能力、机会和动机的政策必须继续支持目标行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a21/11428509/7f8e6c33634d/behavsci-14-00852-g001.jpg

相似文献

4
Determinants of physical activity among adults in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: The DUK-COVID study.
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 May;26(2):588-605. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12497. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived protective behavioral changes in Chinese residents post-dynamic zero-COVID policy lifting: a cross-sectional study.
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1439749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439749. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
2
A cross-country comparison of Covid-19 containment measures and their effects on the epidemic curves.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):1765. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14088-7.
4
Linking human behaviors and infectious diseases.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 16;118(11). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101345118.
7
Behavioral Fatigue: Real Phenomenon, Naïve Construct, or Policy Contrivance?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;11:589892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589892. eCollection 2020.
8
The concept of "fatigue" in tackling covid-19.
BMJ. 2020 Nov 2;371:m4171. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4171.
9
Non-pharmaceutical interventions for containment, mitigation and suppression of COVID-19 infection.
Colomb Med (Cali). 2020 Jun 30;51(2):e4266. doi: 10.25100/cm.v51i2.4266.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验