Suppr超能文献

医疗保健人员心肺复苏质量评估:意大利复苏委员会的一项随机实验研究

Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality among Healthcare Providers: A Randomized Experimental Study of the Italian Resuscitation Council.

作者信息

Cucino Alberto, Babini Giovanni, Scapigliati Andrea, Ristagno Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari-APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.

Italian Resuscitation Council Steering Committee, 40128 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 15;13(18):5476. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185476.

Abstract

The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is pivotal in improving the outcome of cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, there is evidence that even professional rescuers may deliver ineffective chest compressions (CCs). We sought to evaluate the impact of a CPR feedback device on the quality of CC performed by a supposedly highly trained and skilled population of attendees to the national annual congress of the Italian Resuscitation Council. A total of 202 congress attendees were enrolled to perform 2 min CC without feedback, followed by a 5 min rest and another 2 min interval of CC with feedback. Moreover, participants were randomly assigned to two study groups: "feedback later", in which the first 2 min CCs were delivered without the feedback, and "feedback first", in which the first 2 min CCs were aided by feedback. CPR quality has been analyzed in terms of the percentage of CC with adequate depth (CC, %), complete chest release (CR, %), and the CC rate (CC/min). Approximately 60% of correct CCs were performed without feedback, which significantly increased to 79% with the use of feedback. In the "feedback later" group, the percentage of correctly performed CC and CR significantly increased during the second 2 min interval of CC with feedback (median value 51% vs. 86%, < 0.0001 and 71% vs. 84%, = 0.025, respectively). In the "feedback first" group, the percentage of correct CC remained stable during the two CC intervals (71% vs. 80%, = 0.06), while CR was better without the help of the feedback (70% vs. 93%, < 0.0001). CC/min was in the recommended range (100-120/min) in all the CC events. In this population of expected highly skilled CPR providers, the overall quality was inconsistent and, in many cases, did not reach guidelines recommendations. The use of a feedback device significantly improved the quality of CC. When the feedback device was used in the first CC attempt, it had a learning effect that was reflected in maintaining quality during the second CC series.

摘要

心肺复苏(CPR)的质量对于改善心脏骤停的结局至关重要。然而,有证据表明,即使是专业救援人员也可能进行无效的胸外按压(CCs)。我们试图评估CPR反馈设备对意大利复苏委员会全国年度大会上一群据称训练有素且技术熟练的参会者所进行的CC质量的影响。共有202名大会参会者参与,先在无反馈的情况下进行2分钟CC,随后休息5分钟,接着在有反馈的情况下再进行2分钟CC间隔。此外,参与者被随机分为两个研究组:“后反馈组”,即前2分钟CC在无反馈情况下进行;“先反馈组”,即前2分钟CC在反馈辅助下进行。CPR质量根据具有足够深度的CC百分比(CC,%)、完全胸廓回弹(CR,%)以及CC速率(CC/分钟)进行分析。在无反馈情况下,约60%的CC操作正确,使用反馈后这一比例显著增至79%。在“后反馈组”中,在有反馈的第二个2分钟CC间隔期间,正确进行的CC和CR百分比显著增加(中位数分别为51%对86%,<0.0001;71%对84%,=0.025)。在“先反馈组”中,两个CC间隔期间正确CC的百分比保持稳定(71%对80%,=0.06),而在无反馈帮助时CR更好(70%对93%,<0.0001)。所有CC事件中的CC/分钟均在推荐范围内(100 - 120/分钟)。在这群预期技术高超的CPR实施者中,整体质量不一致,在许多情况下未达到指南建议。使用反馈设备显著提高了CC质量。当在首次CC尝试中使用反馈设备时,它具有学习效果,这体现在第二个CC系列期间质量得以维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce47/11431875/fb41cf271212/jcm-13-05476-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验