Ćwiertnia Michał, Dutka Mieczysław, Szlagor Michał, Stasicki Arkadiusz, Białoń Piotr, Kudłacik Beata, Hajduga Maciej B, Mikulska Monika, Majewski Mateusz, Nadolny Klaudiusz, Jaskiewicz Filip, Bobiński Rafał, Kawecki Marek, Ilczak Tomasz
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bielsko-Biala, Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland.
European Pre-Hospital Research Network, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):5500. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185500.
Conducting advanced resuscitation requires medical personnel to carry out appropriately coordinated actions. Certain difficulties arise when it becomes necessary to conduct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on two patients at the same time. The aim of this paper was to assess the actions of teams participating in emergency medicine championships in tasks related to simultaneous cardiac arrests in two patients. The study was conducted on the basis of an analysis of assessment cards for tasks carried out during the 'International Winter Championships in Emergency Medicine'. Three-person medical response teams (MRTs), with the support of two people, had the task of conducting advanced resuscitation on an adult and child simultaneously. The tasks were prepared and developed by European Resuscitation Council (ERC) instructors. The study showed that teams used four methods of checking heart rhythm and performing defibrillation during CPR-using paddles only, using paddles and self-adhesive electrodes, using paddles and a three-lead ECG and using two pairs of self-adhesive electrodes. Teams performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation using paddles and a three-lead ECG performed significantly more actions incorrectly than other teams-in part due to the fact that they incorrectly interpreted which patient's heart rhythm was displayed on the defibrillator screen. The effectiveness of the remaining methods was similar for most of the actions. The CPR method using two pairs of electrodes enabled personal safety to be maintained to the significantly highest percentage during defibrillation. The study demonstrated that the need to conduct CPR on two patients at the same time, irrespective of the method used, caused MRT members considerable difficulties in correctly conducting some of the actions. The method of assessing heart rhythm using paddles and a three-lead ECG should not be used. The study showed that the optimal method of CPR in use appears to be the method using two pairs of adhesive electrodes-it provided, among other things, the significantly highest percentage of safely conducted defibrillation.
进行高级复苏需要医护人员采取适当协调的行动。当有必要同时对两名患者进行心肺复苏(CPR)时,会出现一些困难。本文的目的是评估参加急诊医学锦标赛的团队在与两名患者同时心脏骤停相关任务中的行动。该研究是基于对“国际急诊医学冬季锦标赛”期间执行任务的评估卡进行分析而开展的。三人医疗响应团队(MRTs)在两人的支持下,负责同时对一名成人和一名儿童进行高级复苏。这些任务由欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)的教员准备和制定。研究表明,团队在心肺复苏期间使用了四种检查心律和进行除颤的方法——仅使用电极板、使用电极板和自粘电极、使用电极板和三导联心电图以及使用两对自粘电极。使用电极板和三导联心电图进行心肺复苏的团队比其他团队错误执行的操作明显更多——部分原因是他们错误地解读了除颤器屏幕上显示的是哪位患者的心律。对于大多数操作而言,其余方法的有效性相似。使用两对电极的心肺复苏方法在除颤期间能将个人安全维持在显著更高的比例。该研究表明,无论使用何种方法,同时对两名患者进行心肺复苏的需求都会给MRT成员正确执行某些操作带来相当大的困难。不应使用使用电极板和三导联心电图来评估心律的方法。研究表明,目前使用的心肺复苏最佳方法似乎是使用两对粘性电极的方法——它除了其他方面外,还能在除颤时将安全进行除颤的比例显著提高。