• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进行心脏电复律操作时可能会犯哪些错误?——急诊医学锦标赛期间急诊医疗队表现分析

What Mistakes Can Be Made When Performing the Electrical Cardioversion Procedure?-Analysis of Emergency Medical Team Performance during the Championships in Emergency Medicine.

作者信息

Ćwiertnia Michał, Dutka Mieczysław, Białoń Piotr, Szlagor Michał, Stasicki Arkadiusz, Mikulska Monika, Hajduga Maciej B, Bobiński Rafał, Kawecki Marek, Ilczak Tomasz

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bielsko-Biala, Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland.

European Pre-Hospital Research Network, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;12(17):1724. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171724.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12171724
PMID:39273748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11394996/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical personnel carrying out electrical cardioversion (EC) procedures must remember to have the R-wave sync mode switched on, use the correct energy and maintain personal safety. The defibrillators used by medical response teams most often switch out of cardioversion mode once a shock is delivered. Therefore, this mode must be switched on again before subsequent shocks are delivered. The main aim of the study was to assess the ability of emergency medical teams participating in emergency medicine championships to perform EC.

METHODS

The research was a retrospective observational study and was based on an analysis of the evaluation sheets from two tasks simulating the management of a patient with unstable tachycardia conducted during the International Winter Emergency Medicine Championships. Three-person teams consisting of paramedics and representing the Polish emergency services were included in the study. The team representing the championship organiser and the few foreign teams participating in the competition were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The decision to conduct EC was taken by 36 teams (83.72%) in 2015 and 27 teams (87.10%) in 2019. In both editions of the championships, during consecutive shocks, the percentage of actions performed correctly decreased significantly-switching on synchronisation mode in 2015 (94.4%, 83.33%, 72.22%) and in 2019 (100%, 88.89%, 81.48%); correct energies in 2015 (91.67%, 80.56%, 77.78%) and in 2019 (92.59%, 85.19%, 81.48%); shocks in a safe manner in 2015 (94.44%, 94.44%, 91.67%) and in 2019 (100%, 96.30%, 96.30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Teams participating in the assessed tasks in a significant majority of cases correctly qualified the patient for EC, and correctly carried out the actions required for this procedure. It is of particular note that with every subsequent shock, the percentage of shocks carried out without the sync mode increased significantly.

摘要

背景

实施电复律(EC)操作的医务人员必须记得开启R波同步模式,使用正确的能量并确保个人安全。医疗应急团队使用的除颤器在电击后通常会退出复律模式。因此,在进行后续电击之前必须再次开启此模式。本研究的主要目的是评估参加急诊医学锦标赛的应急医疗团队进行电复律的能力。

方法

该研究为回顾性观察研究,基于对国际冬季急诊医学锦标赛期间模拟不稳定型心动过速患者管理的两项任务的评估表进行分析。研究纳入了由护理人员组成、代表波兰应急服务部门的三人团队。代表锦标赛主办方的团队以及少数参赛的外国团队被排除在研究之外。

结果

2015年有36个团队(83.72%)决定进行电复律,2019年有27个团队(87.10%)。在两届锦标赛中,连续电击时,正确执行的操作百分比显著下降——2015年开启同步模式的比例(94.4%、83.33%、72.22%)和2019年(100%、88.89%、81.48%);2015年正确能量的比例(91.67%、80.56%、77.78%)和2019年(92.59%、85.19%、81.48%);2015年以安全方式电击的比例(94.44%、94.44%、91.67%)和2019年(100%、96.30%、96.30%)。

结论

在绝大多数情况下,参与评估任务的团队正确判定患者适合进行电复律,并正确执行了该操作所需的步骤。特别值得注意的是,随着每次后续电击,未开启同步模式进行电击的比例显著增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/e5c3f7027888/healthcare-12-01724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/7c89d70c85b7/healthcare-12-01724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/473b46220f9e/healthcare-12-01724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/e5c3f7027888/healthcare-12-01724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/7c89d70c85b7/healthcare-12-01724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/473b46220f9e/healthcare-12-01724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7b/11394996/e5c3f7027888/healthcare-12-01724-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
What Mistakes Can Be Made When Performing the Electrical Cardioversion Procedure?-Analysis of Emergency Medical Team Performance during the Championships in Emergency Medicine.进行心脏电复律操作时可能会犯哪些错误?——急诊医学锦标赛期间急诊医疗队表现分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;12(17):1724. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171724.
2
Analysis of Emergency Medical Response Team Performance during the International Winter Championships in Emergency Medicine.分析国际冬季急诊医学锦标赛期间紧急医疗反应团队的表现。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 2;58(11):1578. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111578.
3
Methods of Using a Manual Defibrillator during Simultaneous Cardiac Arrest in Two Patients-Analysis of the Actions of Emergency Medical Response Teams during the Championships in Emergency Medicine.两名患者同时心脏骤停时使用手动除颤器的方法——急诊医学锦标赛期间急诊医疗反应团队的行动分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):5500. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185500.
4
The association between manual mode defibrillation, pre-shock pause duration and appropriate shock delivery when employed by basic life support paramedics during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停期间,基础生命支持护理人员采用手动模式除颤、电击前暂停持续时间与适当电击输送之间的关联。
Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
5
Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performing Advanced Resuscitation Procedures Undertaken by Two- and Three- Person Basic Medical Rescue Teams in Adults under Simulated Conditions.在模拟条件下对两人和三人基础医疗救援小组对成人实施高级复苏程序的效果进行比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;18(9):4834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094834.
6
Predicting team-performance and leadership in emergency situations by observing standardised operational procedures: a prospective single-blind simulator-based trial.通过观察标准化操作程序预测紧急情况下的团队绩效和领导力:一项基于前瞻性单盲模拟的试验。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 11;5(2):102-107. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000342. eCollection 2019.
7
High discharge survival rate after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation with rapid defibrillation by police and paramedics.警察和护理人员进行快速除颤后,院外心室颤动患者的出院存活率较高。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;28(5):480-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70109-9.
8
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
9
Electrical versus pharmacological cardioversion for emergency department patients with acute atrial fibrillation (RAFF2): a partial factorial randomised trial.急诊急性心房颤动患者电复律与药物复律的比较(RAFF2):一项部分析因随机试验。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 1;395(10221):339-349. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32994-0.
10
Optimal paramedic numbers in resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled study in a simulation setting.最佳急救员数量在院外心脏骤停患者复苏中的应用:模拟环境下的随机对照研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235315. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated external defibrillator electrode size and termination of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.自动体外除颤器电极尺寸与院外心脏骤停时室颤的终止
Resuscitation. 2023 Apr;185:109754. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109754. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Electric Cardioversion vs. Pharmacological with or without Electric Cardioversion for Stable New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电复律与药物复律(联合或不联合电复律)治疗稳定型新发房颤的系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 1;12(3):1165. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031165.
3
A stepwise external cardioversion protocol for atrial fibrillation to maximize acute success rate.
一个逐步的心房颤动体外心脏复律方案,以最大限度地提高急性成功率。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):828-834. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad009.
4
Techniques improving electrical cardioversion success for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.提高心房颤动患者电复律成功率的技术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):318-330. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac199.
5
Effective methods to enhance medical students' cardioversion and transcutaneous cardiac pacing skills retention - a prospective controlled study.提高医学生心脏复律和经皮心脏起搏技能保持率的有效方法——一项前瞻性对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03495-4.
6
A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.经胸阻抗在心脏除颤中的系统评价
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;22(7):2808. doi: 10.3390/s22072808.
7
Impact of blended learning on manual defibrillator's use: A simulation-based randomized trial.混合式学习对手动除颤器使用的影响:一项基于模拟的随机试验。
Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):501-511. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12713. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
8
Adverse Events Associated With Electrical Cardioversion in Patients With Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.急性心房颤动和心房扑动患者电复律相关的不良事件。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Simulation Improves Internal Medicine Resident Confidence With Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Transcutaneous Pacemaker Use.模拟提高了内科住院医师在使用除颤、心脏复律和经皮起搏器方面的信心。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):e16648. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16648. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
The Impact of Personal Thoracic Impedance on Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Arrhythmias.个人胸部阻抗对房性心律失常患者电复律的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 13;57(6):618. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060618.