Świątczak Michał, Raczak Alicja, Świątczak Agata, Młodziński Krzysztof, Sikorska Katarzyna, Jaźwińska Anna, Kaufmann Damian, Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz Ludmiła
Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Clinical Psychology Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5544. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185544.
Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a genetic condition with fatigue as an essential but not precisely assessed symptom. While some well-specified scales for fatigue assessment in some pathologies exist, data on their usefulness in HH need to be collected. This research aimed to evaluate fatigue in HH using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ). Seventy-nine HH patients underwent a questionnaire containing items about detailed medical history and the FAS, FSS, and CFQ scales. Twenty-five sex- and age-matched healthy persons constituted the control group (controls); additionally, thirty blood donors (donors) were compared. The fatigue indices were significantly worse in the HH patients than in the controls and donors (HH vs. controls -value: FAS = 0.003, FSS < 0.001, and CFQ = 0.003; HH vs. donors -value: FAS = 0.025, FSS < 0.001, and CFQ = 0.041). There were no differences between the severity of fatigue and the specific genotype or the age of the patients. The HH women presented more severe fatigue than the men. High internal consistency and reliability for each scale were revealed: the Cronbach alpha values were as follows: FAS 0.92, FSS 0.95, and CFQ 0.93. Additionally, the construct validity and factorial validity of the implemented scales were confirmed. The HH patients exhibited significantly worse fatigue across all the scales. The FAS, FSS, and CFQ are simple and reliable diagnostic tools for assessing and quantifying fatigue for clinical and research purposes.
遗传性血色素沉着症(HH)是一种基因疾病,疲劳是其基本症状,但尚未得到精确评估。虽然在某些疾病中有一些明确的疲劳评估量表,但关于它们在HH中的效用的数据仍需收集。本研究旨在使用疲劳评估量表(FAS)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和查尔德疲劳量表(CFQ)来评估HH患者的疲劳情况。79名HH患者接受了一份包含详细病史以及FAS、FSS和CFQ量表项目的问卷。25名年龄和性别匹配的健康人组成了对照组(对照);此外,还比较了30名献血者(献血者)。HH患者的疲劳指数显著差于对照组和献血者(HH与对照组比较 - 值:FAS = 0.003,FSS < 0.001,CFQ = 0.003;HH与献血者比较 - 值:FAS = 0.025,FSS < 0.001,CFQ = 0.041)。疲劳严重程度与患者的特定基因型或年龄之间没有差异。HH女性的疲劳比男性更严重。每个量表都显示出高内部一致性和可靠性:克朗巴哈α值如下:FAS为0.92,FSS为0.95,CFQ为0.93。此外,所实施量表的结构效度和因子效度得到了证实。HH患者在所有量表上的疲劳情况都显著更差。FAS、FSS和CFQ是用于临床和研究目的评估和量化疲劳的简单且可靠的诊断工具。