• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正念疗法与物理疗法与医学疗法:探索新冠疫情期间腰椎手术患者最佳的术后恢复方法——单机构经验

Mindfulness vs. Physiotherapy vs. Medical Therapy: Uncovering the Best Postoperative Recovery Method for Low Back Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single Institution's Experience.

作者信息

La Rocca Giuseppe, Orlando Vittorio, Galieri Gianluca, Mazzucchi Edoardo, Pignotti Fabrizio, Cusumano Davide, Bazzu Paola, Olivi Alessandro, Sabatino Giovanni

机构信息

Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Neurosurgical Training Center and Brain Research, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):917. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090917.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14090917
PMID:39338171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11433326/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness therapy compared to traditional physiotherapy and usual care in alleviating postoperative pain and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF) who presented persistent low back pain after surgery were prospectively followed for one year. They were randomly divided into three groups: mindfulness therapy, physiotherapy, and medical therapy. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score postoperatively and at six months follow-up.

RESULTS

Both mindfulness and physiotherapy groups showed significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the control group, with mean variations of 10.6 and 11.6 points, respectively, versus 4.9 points in the control group. There was no significant difference between mindfulness and physiotherapy ( = 0.52), but both were superior to medical care ( < 0.0001 for physiotherapy and = 0.0007 for mindfulness).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that mindfulness therapy is more effective than usual care in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. In our cohort, its efficacy was comparable to that of physiotherapy, making it a viable alternative, especially when access to healthcare services is restricted, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should validate the findings of this study and examine the long-term effects on surgical patient populations.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间,与传统物理治疗和常规护理相比,正念疗法在减轻腰椎手术患者术后疼痛和改善功能结局方面的疗效。

方法

对90例行腰椎减压融合术(LDF)且术后持续存在下腰痛的患者进行了为期一年的前瞻性随访。他们被随机分为三组:正念疗法组、物理治疗组和药物治疗组。主要结局指标是术后及随访6个月时奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)评分的改善情况。

结果

与对照组相比,正念疗法组和物理治疗组的ODI评分均有显著改善,平均变化分别为10.6分和11.6分,而对照组为4.9分。正念疗法组与物理治疗组之间无显著差异(P = 0.52),但两者均优于药物治疗(物理治疗组P < 0.0001,正念疗法组P = 0.0007)。

结论

本研究表明,正念疗法在改善腰椎手术患者术后结局方面比常规护理更有效。在我们的队列中,其疗效与物理治疗相当,使其成为一种可行的替代方法,尤其是在像2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间那样医疗服务受限的情况下。未来的研究应验证本研究的结果,并研究其对手术患者群体的长期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21e0/11433326/924a735a0379/jpm-14-00917-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21e0/11433326/924a735a0379/jpm-14-00917-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21e0/11433326/924a735a0379/jpm-14-00917-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mindfulness vs. Physiotherapy vs. Medical Therapy: Uncovering the Best Postoperative Recovery Method for Low Back Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single Institution's Experience.正念疗法与物理疗法与医学疗法:探索新冠疫情期间腰椎手术患者最佳的术后恢复方法——单机构经验
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):917. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090917.
2
MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.腰椎融合术的MOS简表36和奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果:一项多中心经验
Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.004.
3
Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.与初次腰椎融合术相比,翻修腰椎融合术的再次手术率更高,临床结果更差。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
The disaggregation of the Oswestry Disability Index in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.接受腰椎手术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症患者的Oswestry功能障碍指数分解情况。
Spine J. 2025 Jan;25(1):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
5
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
6
A Study to Assess the Functional Outcome of Decompression and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Low Grade Spondylolisthesis of Lumbar Vertebra.一项评估腰椎低度峡部裂性椎体滑脱减压及后路腰椎椎间融合术功能结局的研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):RC01-RC03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25135.9531. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.慢性下腰痛和椎间盘退变患者的全椎间盘置换与多学科康复治疗:一项随机对照多中心试验的8年随访
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1480-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis.全膝关节或髋关节置换术后的物理治疗康复:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1-91. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
9
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
10
PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial.准备:退行性腰椎疾病患者的术前物理疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1347-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms.腰椎手术的当前趋势与未来方向:新兴技术与不断演变的管理模式综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 13;14(10):3390. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103390.
2
Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interspinous Devices in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Clinical and Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Spine Conditions.腰椎融合术中椎弓根螺钉固定与棘突间装置的比较分析:退行性脊柱疾病的临床及手术结果
J Pers Med. 2025 Feb 28;15(3):95. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030095.
3
Psychopathological Influences on Surgical and Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Disk Herniation: Prediction Models and Literature Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Three-Step Approach for Lumbar Disk Herniation with Anatomical Insights Tailored for the Next Generation of Young Spine Surgeons.针对腰椎间盘突出症的三步法及为新一代年轻脊柱外科医生量身定制的解剖学见解
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):3571. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123571.
2
The Role of Psychosomatic Traits in Tailored Workup for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion-A Case Series.身心特质在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术个性化检查中的作用——病例系列
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 25;14(5):454. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050454.
3
Ultrasound-Guided vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions for Back Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
腰椎间盘突出症手术及临床结局的精神病理学影响:预测模型与文献分析
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 26;15(2):48. doi: 10.3390/jpm15020048.
超声引导与荧光透视引导干预治疗背痛的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 18;13(22):3474. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223474.
4
Short-Term Effects of Manual Therapy plus Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy in Individuals with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.手法治疗联合电容电阻经皮神经电刺激治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的短期疗效:随机临床试验研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 9;59(7):1275. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071275.
5
Navigated, percutaneous, three-step technique for lumbar and sacral screw placement: a novel, minimally invasive, and maximally safe strategy.导航经皮三步法腰椎和骶骨螺钉置钉技术:一种新颖的、微创的、最大限度安全的策略。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Jun 29;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00696-5.
6
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.腰椎管狭窄症的诊断与治疗:综述
JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921.
7
Psychological Approaches for the Integrative Care of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.心理方法在慢性下腰痛整合照护中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 22;19(1):60. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010060.
8
Cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and behavior therapy for the treatment of chronic pain: randomized controlled trial.认知疗法、基于正念的压力减轻和行为疗法治疗慢性疼痛:随机对照试验。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):376-389. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002357.
9
The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: 3-Month and 12-Month Results of a Pilot Study.术前基于正念减压法对腰椎退行性疾病术后结局的影响:一项试点研究的3个月和12个月结果
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e230-e236. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.186. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
Comparative evaluation of group-based mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment and management of chronic pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于群组的正念减压疗法和认知行为疗法治疗和管理慢性疼痛的比较评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Feb;22(1):26-35. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300062.