• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 AVL 和乙醇处理的病毒培养物中对埃博拉、马尔堡和拉萨热病毒进行灭活验证。

Inactivation Validation of Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa Viruses in AVL and Ethanol-Treated Viral Cultures.

机构信息

National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada.

出版信息

Viruses. 2024 Aug 24;16(9):1354. doi: 10.3390/v16091354.

DOI:10.3390/v16091354
PMID:39339831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436171/
Abstract

High-consequence pathogens such as the Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa viruses are handled in maximum-containment biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories. Genetic material is often isolated from such viruses and subsequently removed from BSL-4 laboratories for a multitude of downstream analyses using readily accessible technologies and equipment available at lower-biosafety level laboratories. However, it is essential to ensure that these materials are free of viable viruses before removal from BSL-4 laboratories to guarantee sample safety. This study details the in-house procedure used for validating the inactivation of Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa virus cultures after incubation with AVL lysis buffer (Qiagen) and ethanol. This study's findings show that no viable virus was detectable when high-titer cultures of Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa viruses were incubated with AVL lysis buffer for 10 min, followed by an equal volume of 95% ethanol for 3 min, using a method with a sensitivity of ≤0.8 log TCID as the limit of detection.

摘要

高致病性病原体,如埃博拉、马尔堡和拉萨热病毒,在最高防护生物安全级别 4(BSL-4)实验室中进行处理。这些病毒的遗传物质通常从实验室中分离出来,然后转移到 BSL-4 实验室之外,以便在更低生物安全级别的实验室中使用易于获取的技术和设备进行多种下游分析。然而,在将这些材料从 BSL-4 实验室中移除之前,必须确保它们不含有活性的病毒,以保证样品的安全。本研究详细介绍了一种内部程序,用于验证在与 AVL 裂解缓冲液(Qiagen)和乙醇孵育后,埃博拉、马尔堡和拉萨热病毒培养物的失活情况。本研究的结果表明,当高滴度的埃博拉、马尔堡和拉萨热病毒培养物用 AVL 裂解缓冲液孵育 10 分钟,然后再用等体积的 95%乙醇孵育 3 分钟时,使用灵敏度≤0.8 log TCID 作为检测限的方法,无法检测到有活性的病毒。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a27/11436171/85859e6cbe4b/viruses-16-01354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a27/11436171/85859e6cbe4b/viruses-16-01354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a27/11436171/85859e6cbe4b/viruses-16-01354-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inactivation Validation of Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa Viruses in AVL and Ethanol-Treated Viral Cultures.在 AVL 和乙醇处理的病毒培养物中对埃博拉、马尔堡和拉萨热病毒进行灭活验证。
Viruses. 2024 Aug 24;16(9):1354. doi: 10.3390/v16091354.
2
Validation of Marburg Virus Inactivation by AVL Buffer.马堡病毒在 AVL 缓冲液中失活的验证。
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2877:55-65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4256-6_4.
3
[Research with the Marburg, Lassa and Ebola viruses].[关于马尔堡病毒、拉沙病毒和埃博拉病毒的研究]
Vopr Virusol. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2):54-8.
4
Viral haemorrhagic fevers caused by Lassa, Ebola and Marburg viruses.由拉沙病毒、埃博拉病毒和马尔堡病毒引起的病毒性出血热。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;582:35-44. doi: 10.1007/0-387-33026-7_4.
5
Buffer AVL Alone Does Not Inactivate Ebola Virus in a Representative Clinical Sample Type.单独使用AVL缓冲液不能使典型临床样本类型中的埃博拉病毒失活。
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct;53(10):3148-54. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01449-15. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
Methanol Fixation, but not Giemsa Staining, Inactivates Ebola and Lassa Viruses in Peripheral Blood Smears Made on Plastic Microscope Slides.甲醇固定而非吉姆萨染色可使塑料显微镜载玻片上制作的外周血涂片上的埃博拉病毒和拉萨热病毒失活。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov;103(5):2085-2090. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0840.
7
Preservation of scRNA-Seq Libraries Using Existing Inactivation Protocols.使用现有灭活方案保存单细胞RNA测序文库
Pathogens. 2024 Feb 13;13(2):167. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13020167.
8
Validating the Inactivation Effectiveness of Chemicals on Ebola Virus.验证化学物质对埃博拉病毒的灭活效果。
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1628:251-257. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7116-9_20.
9
The effect of a non-denaturing detergent and a guanidinium-based inactivation agent on the viability of Ebola virus in mock clinical serum samples.非变性去污剂和胍基类灭活剂对模拟临床血清样本中埃博拉病毒存活能力的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2017 Dec;250:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
10
Inactivating Lassa and Marburg/Ebola viruses.灭活拉沙病毒以及马尔堡病毒/埃博拉病毒。
Lancet. 1982 Jul 17;2(8290):155. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91118-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Era of Gene Therapy: The Advancement of Lentiviral Vectors and Their Pseudotyping.基因治疗时代:慢病毒载体及其假型化的进展
Viruses. 2025 Jul 24;17(8):1036. doi: 10.3390/v17081036.
2
Virucidal Approaches for Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses.出血热病毒的杀病毒方法。
Viruses. 2025 Apr 30;17(5):663. doi: 10.3390/v17050663.
3
Successful Inactivation of High-Consequence Pathogens in PrimeStore Molecular Transport Media.在PrimeStore分子转运介质中成功灭活高致病性病原体

本文引用的文献

1
Dangerous Risk Group-4 (RG-4) emergent viruses.危险风险组4(RG-4)新兴病毒
Bioinformation. 2023 Apr 30;19(4):345-347. doi: 10.6026/97320630019345. eCollection 2023.
2
Virus Inactivation by Formaldehyde and Common Lysis Buffers.甲醛和常见裂解缓冲液对病毒的灭活作用。
Viruses. 2023 Aug 4;15(8):1693. doi: 10.3390/v15081693.
3
Establishment of an Inactivation Method for Ebola Virus and SARS-CoV-2 Suitable for Downstream Sequencing of Low Cell Numbers.建立一种适用于低细胞数下游测序的埃博拉病毒和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)灭活方法。
Viruses. 2025 Apr 29;17(5):639. doi: 10.3390/v17050639.
4
Approaches for inactivating highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 cattle isolate for safe containment level 2 laboratory practices.用于灭活高致病性禽流感H5N1牛分离株以符合生物安全2级实验室操作安全要求的方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 May 21;91(5):e0235624. doi: 10.1128/aem.02356-24. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
Pathogens. 2023 Feb 17;12(2):342. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020342.
4
Inactivation efficacy of H5N1 avian influenza virus by commonly used sample preparation reagents for safe laboratory practices.常用样品制备试剂对H5N1禽流感病毒的灭活效果,以确保实验室安全操作
J Virol Methods. 2022 Jun;304:114527. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114527. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
5
The Effect of Common Viral Inactivation Techniques on 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Analysis of the Gut Microbiota.常见病毒灭活技术对基于16S rRNA扩增子的肠道微生物群分析的影响
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 17;9(8):1755. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081755.
6
Inactivation of African Swine Fever Virus by reagents commonly used in containment laboratories.利用生物安全实验室常用试剂灭活非洲猪瘟病毒
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114203. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114203. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
Decontamination of common healthcare facility surfaces contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 using peracetic acid dry fogging.使用过氧乙酸干雾对污染 SARS-CoV-2 的常见医疗机构表面进行消毒。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Mar;109:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Assessment of inactivation procedures for SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 灭活程序的评估。
J Gen Virol. 2021 Mar;102(3). doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001539. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Evaluation of Chemical Protocols for Inactivating SARS-CoV-2 Infectious Samples.评估用于灭活 SARS-CoV-2 传染性样本的化学方案。
Viruses. 2020 Jun 8;12(6):624. doi: 10.3390/v12060624.
10
Inactivation of foot-and-mouth disease virus A/IRN/8/2015 with commercially available lysis buffers.使用市售裂解缓冲液对 A/IRN/8/2015 型口蹄疫病毒的灭活。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Apr;278:113835. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113835. Epub 2020 Feb 5.