• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

污水监测 SARS-CoV-2:两种浓缩方法的比较。

Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods.

机构信息

Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45100 Ioannina, Greece.

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Viruses. 2024 Aug 31;16(9):1398. doi: 10.3390/v16091398.

DOI:10.3390/v16091398
PMID:39339875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436116/
Abstract

Wastewater surveillance is crucial for the epidemiological monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Various concentration techniques, such as skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, are employed to isolate the virus effectively. This study aims to compare these two methods and determine the one with the superior recovery rates. From February to December 2021, 24-h wastewater samples were collected from the Ioannina Wastewater Treatment Plant's inlet and processed using both techniques. Subsequent viral genome isolation and a real-time RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. The quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher detection sensitivity with a PEG-based concentration than SMF. Moreover, when the samples were positive by both methods, PEG consistently yielded higher viral loads. These findings underscore the need for further research into concentration methodologies and the development of precise protocols to enhance epidemiological surveillance through wastewater analysis.

摘要

污水监测对于 SARS-CoV-2 的流行病学监测至关重要。各种浓缩技术,如脱脂奶絮凝(SMF)和聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀,被用于有效地分离病毒。本研究旨在比较这两种方法,并确定回收率更高的方法。2021 年 2 月至 12 月,从约阿尼纳污水处理厂的入口处采集了 24 小时污水样本,并使用这两种技术进行了处理。随后进行了病毒基因组分离和实时 RT-qPCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2。定量分析表明,PEG 法的检测灵敏度高于 SMF 法。此外,当两种方法的样本均呈阳性时,PEG 法始终能检测到更高的病毒载量。这些发现强调了需要进一步研究浓缩方法,并制定精确的方案,通过污水分析加强流行病学监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a9/11436116/eb85bd6a85df/viruses-16-01398-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a9/11436116/0a6c557a18a2/viruses-16-01398-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a9/11436116/eb85bd6a85df/viruses-16-01398-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a9/11436116/0a6c557a18a2/viruses-16-01398-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a9/11436116/eb85bd6a85df/viruses-16-01398-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods.污水监测 SARS-CoV-2:两种浓缩方法的比较。
Viruses. 2024 Aug 31;16(9):1398. doi: 10.3390/v16091398.
2
Comparison of Different Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Methods for Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: Exploratory Study.基于不同逆转录-聚合酶链反应方法的 SARS-CoV-2 废水监测比较:探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 19;10:e53175. doi: 10.2196/53175.
3
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater as an earlier predictor of COVID-19 epidemic peaks in Venezuela.从废水中检测 SARS-CoV-2 可作为预测委内瑞拉 COVID-19 疫情高峰的早期指标。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 8;14(1):27294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78982-3.
4
Wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 gene for COVID-19 epidemiological surveillance in Tucumán, Argentina.阿根廷图库曼省通过污水监测新冠病毒 SARS-CoV-2 基因进行新冠疫情流行病学监测。
J Basic Microbiol. 2024 Aug;64(8):e2300773. doi: 10.1002/jobm.202300773. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
Analytical validation of a semi-automated methodology for quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater collected in northern New England.分析验证一种用于定量测量新英格兰北部采集的污水中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的半自动化方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0112223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01122-23. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Methods Evaluation for Rapid Concentration and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in Raw Wastewater Using Droplet Digital and Quantitative RT-PCR.采用液滴数字和实时定量 RT-PCR 快速浓缩和定量原始废水中 SARS-CoV-2 的方法评估。
Food Environ Virol. 2021 Sep;13(3):303-315. doi: 10.1007/s12560-021-09488-8. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Comparison of the methods for isolation and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater.比较市政污水中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的分离和检测方法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;11:1116636. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116636. eCollection 2023.
8
Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Zambia: An Early Warning Tool.赞比亚的 SARS-CoV-2 污水监测:预警工具。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 14;25(16):8839. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168839.
9
Comparing solid-based concentration methods for rapid and efficient recovery of SARS-CoV-2 for wastewater surveillance.比较基于固体的浓缩方法,以快速有效地从废水中回收 SARS-CoV-2 进行监测。
J Virol Methods. 2023 Oct;320:114790. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114790. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
Time Evolution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Wastewater during the First Pandemic Wave of COVID-19 in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, Spain.西班牙巴塞罗那大都市区首次 COVID-19 大流行期间废水中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的时间演变。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Mar 11;87(7). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02750-20.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of Skimmed-Milk Flocculation Method for Wastewater Surveillance of COVID-19 in Kathmandu, Nepal.脱脂牛奶絮凝法在尼泊尔加德满都新冠病毒废水监测中的应用。
Pathogens. 2024 Apr 29;13(5):366. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13050366.
2
SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance in the Czech Republic: Spatial and temporal differences in SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations and relationship to clinical data and wastewater parameters.捷克共和国的新型冠状病毒2型废水监测:新型冠状病毒2型RNA浓度的时空差异及其与临床数据和废水参数的关系
Water Res X. 2024 Mar 28;23:100220. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100220. eCollection 2024 May 1.
3
Timely Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Fragments in Wastewater Shows the Emergence of JN.1 (BA.2.86.1.1, Clade 23I) in Berlin, Germany.
及时监测废水中的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 片段表明德国柏林出现了 JN.1(BA.2.86.1.1,23I 分支)。
Viruses. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):102. doi: 10.3390/v16010102.
4
A systematic review of industrial wastewater management: Evaluating challenges and enablers.工业废水管理的系统综述:评估挑战与推动因素。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 15;348:119230. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119230. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 RNA in Sewage and Correlation with Reported COVID-19 Prevalence in the Early Stage of the Epidemic in The Netherlands.荷兰疫情早期污水中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)RNA的存在及其与报告的COVID-19患病率的相关性
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2020 May 20;7(7):511-516. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00357. eCollection 2020 Jul 14.
6
Time series modelling for wastewater-based epidemiology of COVID-19: A nationwide study in 40 wastewater treatment plants of Belgium, February 2021 to June 2022.基于污水的 COVID-19 流行病学时间序列建模:2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 6 月在比利时 40 个污水处理厂的全国性研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 15;899:165603. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165603. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
Wastewater-based prediction of COVID-19 cases using a random forest algorithm with strain prevalence data: A case study of five municipalities in Latvia.基于废水的随机森林算法对新冠病毒病例的预测:以拉脱维亚五个直辖市为例的研究
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 15;891:164519. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164519. Epub 2023 May 31.
8
Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Austria: development, implementation, and operation of the Tyrolean wastewater monitoring program.奥地利的 SARS-CoV-2 污水监测:蒂罗尔污水监测计划的开发、实施和运行。
J Water Health. 2022 Feb;20(2):314-328. doi: 10.2166/wh.2022.218.
9
SARS-CoV-2 variant detection from wastewater: rapid spread of B.1.1.7 lineage in Hungary.从污水中检测 SARS-CoV-2 变异株:B.1.1.7 谱系在匈牙利迅速传播。
J Water Health. 2022 Feb;20(2):277-286. doi: 10.2166/wh.2022.179.
10
Long-term SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the wastewater of Stockholm: What lessons can be learned from the Swedish perspective?斯德哥尔摩污水中 SARS-CoV-2 的长期监测:瑞典的经验教训有哪些?
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 3):160023. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160023. Epub 2022 Nov 8.