Suppr超能文献

跨坐型骨折前路骨盆钢板固定与耻骨支螺钉固定的对比研究:一项配对结局分析。

Comparative study on anterior pelvic plating and pubic ramus screw fixation for straddle fracture: a matched-pair outcome analysis.

机构信息

Orthopedic Trauma Division, Trauma Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero, 774 Beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St, Denver, MC, Colorado, 0188, 80204, USA.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2024 Dec;48(12):3217-3225. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06338-7. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Straddle fractures involving both the superior and inferior rami often require surgical fixation due to instability. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of pubic ramus screw fixation (PRSF) and anterior pelvic plating (APP) for the treatment of these fractures to identify the superior method.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients (37 males, 33 females; average age 47.6 years) treated surgically for straddle fractures at two Level 1 trauma centres between May 2017 and August 2022. The patients were divided into two groups, where 26 underwent PRSF and 44 underwent APP. The groups were matched based on preoperative characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index, injury mechanism, and severity. The key variables analysed included operation time, blood transfusion volume, early weight-bearing capability, and complication and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

After matching, PRSF was associated with a shorter operative time (71.0 min vs. 118.3 min for APP, p < 0.0009) and lower blood transfusion requirements (0 units vs. 1 unit, p < 0.0001). Postoperatively, 61.5% of PRSF patients tolerated early weight-bearing, compared to none in the APP group. However, in two cases, PRSF could not be performed due to severe comminution or anatomical limitations, necessitating conversion to APP. Complication rates were similar between the groups (30.8% for PRSF vs. 27.3% for APP, p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

PRSF demonstrated advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced blood transfusions, and earlier weight-bearing. However, APP remains valuable for complex fracture patterns. Treatment should be individualized based on fracture complexity and patient-specific factors to optimize outcomes.

摘要

目的

涉及耻骨上、下支的跨骑骨折由于不稳定,通常需要手术固定。本研究比较了耻骨支螺钉固定(PRSF)和前骨盆钢板(APP)治疗这些骨折的临床和影像学结果,以确定哪种方法更优。

方法

对 2017 年 5 月至 2022 年 8 月在 2 个 1 级创伤中心接受手术治疗的 70 例(男性 37 例,女性 33 例;平均年龄 47.6 岁)跨骑骨折患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组,其中 26 例行 PRSF,44 例行 APP。两组根据术前特征(如年龄、性别、体重指数、损伤机制和严重程度)进行匹配。分析的关键变量包括手术时间、输血量、早期负重能力以及并发症和再次手术率。

结果

匹配后,PRSF 手术时间更短(71.0 分钟 vs. APP 组的 118.3 分钟,p<0.0009),输血量更少(0 单位 vs. APP 组的 1 单位,p<0.0001)。术后,61.5%的 PRSF 患者能够早期负重,而 APP 组无一人能负重。然而,有两例因严重粉碎或解剖限制而无法行 PRSF,需要转换为 APP。两组并发症发生率相似(PRSF 组 30.8%,APP 组 27.3%,p=0.93)。

结论

PRSF 具有手术时间短、输血减少和早期负重的优势。然而,APP 对于复杂的骨折类型仍然有价值。治疗应根据骨折复杂性和患者具体因素个体化,以优化治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验