Is Anterior Plating Superior to the Bilateral Use of Retrograde Transpubic Screws for Treatment of Straddle Pelvic Ring Fractures? A Biomechanical Investigation.

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the four anterior pubic rami are described as "straddle fractures". The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical anterior plating (group 1) versus the bilateral use of retrograde transpubic screws (group 2).

METHODS

A straddle fracture was simulated in 16 artificial pelvises. All specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading, with monitoring by means of motion tracking.

RESULTS

Axial stiffness did not differ significantly between the groups, = 0.88. Fracture displacement after 1000-4000 cycles was not significantly different between the groups, ≥ 0.38; however, after 5000 cycles it was significantly less in the retrograde transpubic screw group compared to the anterior plating group, = 0.04. No significantly different flexural rotations were detected between the groups, ≥ 0.32. Moreover, no significant differences were detected between the groups with respect to their cycles to failure and failure loads, = 0.14.

CONCLUSION

The results of this biomechanical study reveal less fracture displacement in the retrograde transpubic screw group after long-term testing with no further significant difference between anterior plating and bilateral use of retrograde transpubic screws. While the open approach using anterior plating allows for better visualization of the fracture site and open reduction, the use of bilateral retrograde transpubic screws, splinting the fracture, presents a minimally invasive and biomechanically stable technique.