• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全国代表性的背痛成人样本中对4种疼痛影响测量方法进行交叉比对

Crosswalking 4 Pain Impact Measures in a Nationally Representative Sample of Adults With Back Pain.

作者信息

DiGuiseppi Graham T, Edelen Maria Orlando, Rodriguez Anthony, Slaughter Mary, Hays Ron D, Zeng Chengbo, Coulter Ian D, Herman Patricia M

机构信息

RAND, Pittsburgh, PA.

RAND, Boston, MA; Patient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar;106(3):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.007
PMID:39341440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11875982/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To generate crosswalk equations and tables for 4 pain impact measures: the Impact Stratification Score (ISS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity Scale (PEG).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey assessing demographics and pain impact. Crosswalks were developed using item-response theory (IRT) cocalibrations and linear regressions between the ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and PEG.

SETTING

Online panel.

PARTICIPANTS

Population-based sample of United States adults aged 18 and older. Eligibility criteria were reporting current back pain, not reporting 2 fake health conditions, and having data for 2 or more pain measures (N=1530; 37% of sample). Crosswalks were developed (n=1030) and cross-validated in a subsample of 500 participants (n=125 randomly sampled from each ISS quartile).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and the PEG.

RESULTS

Associations of the ISS with the PEG and ODI met the criteria for IRT cocalibration. Other measure pairs were crosswalked using regression. Associations were strongest between the PEG and the ISS (r=0.87, normalized mean absolute error [NMAE]=0.38) and between the ODI and the ISS (r=0.85, NMAE=0.39). Associations were weakest between the PEG and the RMDQ (r=0.69, R=0.48, NMAE: 0.55-0.58). Regression equations and IRT accounted for 48%-64% of the variance (NMAE: 0.38-0.58) in corresponding pain measures in the cross-validation sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The crosswalks between the ISS and common legacy pain measures created in this study of a nationally representative sample of United States adults with back pain can be used to estimate 1 pain impact measure from another. Further evaluation in clinical samples is recommended.

摘要

目的

为4种疼痛影响测量指标生成转换方程和表格,这4种指标分别是影响分层评分(ISS)、奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)、罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)以及疼痛、生活乐趣和日常活动量表(PEG)。

设计

评估人口统计学特征和疼痛影响的横断面调查。转换关系通过项目反应理论(IRT)共同校准以及ISS、ODI、RMDQ和PEG之间的线性回归得出。

设置

在线小组。

参与者

以美国18岁及以上成年人作为基于人群的样本。纳入标准为报告当前存在背痛、未报告2种虚假健康状况且有2种或更多疼痛测量指标的数据(N = 1530;占样本的37%)。生成转换关系(n = 1030)并在500名参与者的子样本中进行交叉验证(从每个ISS四分位数中随机抽取n = 125)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

ISS、ODI、RMDQ和PEG。

结果

ISS与PEG和ODI的关联符合IRT共同校准标准。其他测量指标对通过回归进行转换。PEG与ISS之间的关联最强(r = 0.87,标准化平均绝对误差[NMAE] = 0.38),ODI与ISS之间的关联次之(r = 0.85,NMAE = 0.39)。PEG与RMDQ之间的关联最弱(r = 0.69,R = 0.48,NMAE:0.55 - 0.58)。回归方程和IRT解释了交叉验证样本中相应疼痛测量指标48% - 64%的方差(NMAE:0.38 - 0.58)。

结论

在这项针对美国有背痛的成年人全国代表性样本的研究中创建的ISS与常见传统疼痛测量指标之间的转换关系,可用于从另一个指标估算一个疼痛影响指标。建议在临床样本中进行进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Crosswalking 4 Pain Impact Measures in a Nationally Representative Sample of Adults With Back Pain.在全国代表性的背痛成人样本中对4种疼痛影响测量方法进行交叉比对
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar;106(3):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
A protocol for chronic pain outcome measurement enhancement by linking PROMIS-29 scale to legacy measures and improving chronic pain stratification.一项通过将患者报告结果测量信息系统-29量表与传统测量方法相联系并改善慢性疼痛分层来增强慢性疼痛结果测量的方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 10;21(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03696-2.
3
Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.由PROMIS-29 + 2和PROMIS-16生成的PROMIS偏好(PROPr)评分的一致性。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03827-5. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
4
Yoga treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain.瑜伽治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 12;1(1):CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub2.
5
Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.评估慢性下背痛治疗成功的常用结局指标。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d.
6
Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.评估脊柱手术后患者报告的疼痛与功能和生活质量结局的相关性和反应性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de.
7
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和奥斯威斯残疾指数:在测量非特异性下腰痛的身体功能方面,哪一个具有更好的测量属性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1620-1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Prognostic ability of the sTarT back screening tool for disability and pain intensity outcomes in older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care: a multi-national external validation study.sTarT背部筛查工具对寻求脊椎按摩治疗的老年腰痛患者残疾和疼痛强度结果的预后能力:一项多国外部验证研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2025 Jul 30;33(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12998-025-00592-1.
10
Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.瑜伽治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 18;11(11):CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Health Survey Data Cost and Quality Between Amazon's Mechanical Turk and Ipsos' KnowledgePanel: Observational Study.比较亚马逊土耳其机器人和益普索知识面板的健康调查数据成本和质量:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 29;26:e63032. doi: 10.2196/63032.
2
Effects of Excluding Those Who Report Having "Syndomitis" or "Chekalism" on Data Quality: Longitudinal Health Survey of a Sample From Amazon's Mechanical Turk.排除报告患有“ Syndomitis”或“Chekalism”的人对数据质量的影响:来自亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 的样本的纵向健康调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46421. doi: 10.2196/46421.
3
Can a linking crosswalk table be applied to a different population? An independent validation study for a crosswalk between BSI depression and PROMIS depression scales.链接转换表可用于不同人群吗?BSI 抑郁量表和 PROMIS 抑郁量表之间转换的独立验证研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0278232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278232. eCollection 2022.
4
Crosswalking the National Institutes of Health Impact Stratification Score to the PEG.将国家卫生研究院影响分层评分转化为 PEG。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar;104(3):425-429. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
5
PROsetta: An Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.PROsetta:一个用于关联患者报告结局指标的软件包。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jul;45(5):386-388. doi: 10.1177/01466216211013106. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Back, Lower Limb, and Upper Limb Pain Among U.S. Adults, 2019.美国成年人的背痛、下肢痛和上肢痛,2019 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Jul(415):1-8.
7
Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS.将评分与患者报告的健康结果量表相关联:三种关联方法的验证研究与比较。
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):717-746. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09776-z. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
8
Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances.慢性疼痛:负担、最佳实践和新进展的更新。
Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2082-2097. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7.
9
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.美国成年人慢性疼痛的患病率。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
10
Crosswalking the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity Scores to the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.将患者报告的结局测量信息系统的身体功能、疼痛干扰和疼痛强度评分与 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷和 Oswestry 残疾指数进行交叉核对。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul;102(7):1317-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 5.