DiGuiseppi Graham T, Edelen Maria Orlando, Rodriguez Anthony, Slaughter Mary, Hays Ron D, Zeng Chengbo, Coulter Ian D, Herman Patricia M
RAND, Pittsburgh, PA.
RAND, Boston, MA; Patient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar;106(3):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
To generate crosswalk equations and tables for 4 pain impact measures: the Impact Stratification Score (ISS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity Scale (PEG).
Cross-sectional survey assessing demographics and pain impact. Crosswalks were developed using item-response theory (IRT) cocalibrations and linear regressions between the ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and PEG.
Online panel.
Population-based sample of United States adults aged 18 and older. Eligibility criteria were reporting current back pain, not reporting 2 fake health conditions, and having data for 2 or more pain measures (N=1530; 37% of sample). Crosswalks were developed (n=1030) and cross-validated in a subsample of 500 participants (n=125 randomly sampled from each ISS quartile).
Not applicable.
ISS, ODI, RMDQ, and the PEG.
Associations of the ISS with the PEG and ODI met the criteria for IRT cocalibration. Other measure pairs were crosswalked using regression. Associations were strongest between the PEG and the ISS (r=0.87, normalized mean absolute error [NMAE]=0.38) and between the ODI and the ISS (r=0.85, NMAE=0.39). Associations were weakest between the PEG and the RMDQ (r=0.69, R=0.48, NMAE: 0.55-0.58). Regression equations and IRT accounted for 48%-64% of the variance (NMAE: 0.38-0.58) in corresponding pain measures in the cross-validation sample.
The crosswalks between the ISS and common legacy pain measures created in this study of a nationally representative sample of United States adults with back pain can be used to estimate 1 pain impact measure from another. Further evaluation in clinical samples is recommended.
为4种疼痛影响测量指标生成转换方程和表格,这4种指标分别是影响分层评分(ISS)、奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)、罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)以及疼痛、生活乐趣和日常活动量表(PEG)。
评估人口统计学特征和疼痛影响的横断面调查。转换关系通过项目反应理论(IRT)共同校准以及ISS、ODI、RMDQ和PEG之间的线性回归得出。
在线小组。
以美国18岁及以上成年人作为基于人群的样本。纳入标准为报告当前存在背痛、未报告2种虚假健康状况且有2种或更多疼痛测量指标的数据(N = 1530;占样本的37%)。生成转换关系(n = 1030)并在500名参与者的子样本中进行交叉验证(从每个ISS四分位数中随机抽取n = 125)。
不适用。
ISS、ODI、RMDQ和PEG。
ISS与PEG和ODI的关联符合IRT共同校准标准。其他测量指标对通过回归进行转换。PEG与ISS之间的关联最强(r = 0.87,标准化平均绝对误差[NMAE] = 0.38),ODI与ISS之间的关联次之(r = 0.85,NMAE = 0.39)。PEG与RMDQ之间的关联最弱(r = 0.69,R = 0.48,NMAE:0.55 - 0.58)。回归方程和IRT解释了交叉验证样本中相应疼痛测量指标48% - 64%的方差(NMAE:0.38 - 0.58)。
在这项针对美国有背痛的成年人全国代表性样本的研究中创建的ISS与常见传统疼痛测量指标之间的转换关系,可用于从另一个指标估算一个疼痛影响指标。建议在临床样本中进行进一步评估。