Suppr超能文献

头皮毛发细菌群落结构分析的样本采集方法:非侵入性拭子与侵入性毛发切割。

Sample collecting methods for bacterial community structure analysis of scalp hair: non-invasive swabbing versus intrusive hair shaft cutting.

机构信息

Laboratory of Fermentation Microbiology, Department of Fermentation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Biosciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka 1-1-1, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 156-8502, Japan.

Laboratory of Soil and Environmental Microbiology, Division of Systems Bioengineering, Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72936-5.

Abstract

Human skin samples for microbiome analysis are traditionally collected using a non-invasive swabbing method. Here, we compared the differences in bacterial community structures on scalp hair and scalps with samples collected using non-invasive swabbing and cutting/removal of scalp hair in 12 individuals. Hair-related samples, such as hair shafts and hair swabs, had significantly higher alpha diversity than scalp swab samples, whereas there were no significant differences between hair shafts and hair swabs. The relative abundances of the three major phyla and five major operational taxonomic units were not significantly different between the hair shaft and hair swab samples. The principal coordinate analysis plots based on weighted UniFrac distances were grouped into two clusters: samples from hair-related areas and scalp swabs, and there were significant differences only between samples from hair-related areas and scalp swabs. In addition, a weighted UniFrac analysis revealed that the sampling site-based category was a statistical category but not a hair sampling method-based category. These results suggest that scalp hair bacteria collected using non-invasive swab sampling were comparable to those collected cutting/removal of scalp hair.

摘要

用于微生物组分析的人体皮肤样本传统上使用非侵入性拭子方法采集。在这里,我们比较了在 12 个人中使用非侵入性拭子和头皮毛发切割/去除收集的头皮和头发样本的细菌群落结构差异。毛发相关样本,如毛发轴和毛发拭子,具有明显更高的 alpha 多样性,而头皮拭子样本之间没有显著差异。三个主要门和五个主要操作分类单元的相对丰度在毛发轴和毛发拭子样本之间没有显著差异。基于加权 UniFrac 距离的主坐标分析图分为两个聚类:来自毛发相关区域和头皮拭子的样本,只有来自毛发相关区域和头皮拭子的样本之间存在显著差异。此外,加权 UniFrac 分析表明,基于采样部位的类别是一个统计类别,而不是基于毛发采样方法的类别。这些结果表明,使用非侵入性拭子采样收集的头皮毛发细菌与切割/去除头皮毛发收集的细菌相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9832/11439011/ca44e778477e/41598_2024_72936_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验