Suppr超能文献

针对糖尿病足溃疡微生物组样本采集的非侵入性收集方法。

Toward non-invasive collection methods for sampling the microbiome of diabetic foot ulcers.

机构信息

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia.

Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3731-3737. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14267. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

Abstract

Identifying the microbiome within chronic diabetic foot ulcers is essential if effective antimicrobial therapies are to be administered. Using culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the aim of this study was to compare the microbiome of paired tissue scraping samples with swab samples, collected from participants during attendance at a high-risk foot clinic. The mean richness of cultured swab and tissue scraping samples was consistent, with anaerobes infrequently isolated from both sample types. Comparing percentage frequencies of detection of selected genera of known and potential pathogens namely Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas from cultured and sequenced swab and tissue scrapings indicated that both collection methods captured varying percentages of all the selected genera. The mean abundance of sequenced samples was not significantly different between swabs and tissue scrapings. The mean richness or number of distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and Shannon's H diversity index were not significantly different between the two collection methods. The mean relative abundance of the selected genera of known and potential pathogens, including anaerobes Anaerococcus and Finegoldia, was higher in swabs compared with tissue scrapings and significantly so in Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas genera. Multivariate analyses confirmed no significant differences between the bacterial community compositions of the paired samples. These results suggest that tissue scrapings and swabs can effectively capture the microbiome of chronic DFUs using culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

摘要

如果要进行有效的抗菌治疗,就必须确定慢性糖尿病足溃疡中的微生物组。本研究采用培养和 16S rRNA 基因测序的方法,旨在比较从参加高危足部诊所的参与者收集的组织刮取样本和拭子样本的微生物组。培养拭子和组织刮取样本的丰富度平均值一致,两种样本类型均很少分离出厌氧菌。比较从培养和测序的拭子和组织刮片中检测到的已知和潜在病原体(即金黄色葡萄球菌、链球菌、肠球菌、棒状杆菌、肠杆菌科和假单胞菌)的选定属的检测百分比频率表明,两种采集方法都捕获了所有选定属的不同百分比。测序样本的平均丰度在拭子和组织刮片中没有显著差异。两种采集方法之间的平均丰富度或独特操作分类单位(OTU)数量和 Shannon 的 H 多样性指数没有显著差异。包括厌氧菌 Anaerococcus 和 Finegoldia 在内的已知和潜在病原体的选定属的平均相对丰度在拭子中比组织刮片中更高,在金黄色葡萄球菌和假单胞菌属中差异尤为显著。多元分析证实配对样本的细菌群落组成没有显著差异。这些结果表明,组织刮取物和拭子可以通过培养和 16S rRNA 基因测序有效地捕获慢性 DFU 的微生物组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ee/10588311/db1d226f56ad/IWJ-20-3731-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验