• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然语言处理(NLP)机器学习模型与人类医生在ASA身体状况分类方面的比较。

Comparison of NLP machine learning models with human physicians for ASA Physical Status classification.

作者信息

Yoon Soo Bin, Lee Jipyeong, Lee Hyung-Chul, Jung Chul-Woo, Lee Hyeonhoon

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):259. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01259-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01259-6
PMID:39341936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11439044/
Abstract

The American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification system assesses comorbidities before sedation and analgesia, but inconsistencies among raters have hindered its objective use. This study aimed to develop natural language processing (NLP) models to classify ASA-PS using pre-anesthesia evaluation summaries, comparing their performance to human physicians. Data from 717,389 surgical cases in a tertiary hospital (October 2004-May 2023) was split into training, tuning, and test datasets. Board-certified anesthesiologists created reference labels for tuning and test datasets. The NLP models, including ClinicalBigBird, BioClinicalBERT, and Generative Pretrained Transformer 4, were validated against anesthesiologists. The ClinicalBigBird model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.915. It outperformed board-certified anesthesiologists with a specificity of 0.901 vs. 0.897, precision of 0.732 vs. 0.715, and F1-score of 0.716 vs. 0.713 (all p <0.01). This approach will facilitate automatic and objective ASA-PS classification, thereby streamlining the clinical workflow.

摘要

美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分类系统在镇静和镇痛前评估合并症,但评估者之间的不一致阻碍了其客观使用。本研究旨在开发自然语言处理(NLP)模型,使用麻醉前评估摘要对ASA-PS进行分类,并将其性能与人类医生进行比较。一家三级医院(2004年10月至2023年5月)717389例手术病例的数据被分为训练、调整和测试数据集。获得委员会认证的麻醉医师为调整和测试数据集创建了参考标签。包括ClinicalBigBird、BioClinicalBERT和生成式预训练变换器4在内的NLP模型与麻醉医师进行了验证。ClinicalBigBird模型的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.915。其表现优于获得委员会认证的麻醉医师,特异性分别为0.901和0.897,精确度分别为0.732和0.715,F1分数分别为0.716和0.713(所有p<0.01)。这种方法将有助于自动、客观地进行ASA-PS分类,从而简化临床工作流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/6209626fad20/41746_2024_1259_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/ab37096daa9e/41746_2024_1259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/d89d22d90e03/41746_2024_1259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/6d531da9e3a6/41746_2024_1259_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/6209626fad20/41746_2024_1259_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/ab37096daa9e/41746_2024_1259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/d89d22d90e03/41746_2024_1259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/6d531da9e3a6/41746_2024_1259_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec80/11439044/6209626fad20/41746_2024_1259_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of NLP machine learning models with human physicians for ASA Physical Status classification.自然语言处理(NLP)机器学习模型与人类医生在ASA身体状况分类方面的比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):259. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01259-6.
2
Prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification from preoperative clinical text narratives using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术从术前临床文本叙述中预测美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02248-0.
3
Few-Shot Learning for Clinical Natural Language Processing Using Siamese Neural Networks: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.使用暹罗神经网络的临床自然语言处理少样本学习:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR AI. 2023 May 4;2:e44293. doi: 10.2196/44293.
4
Machine Learning Algorithm to Perform the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification.用于执行美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类的机器学习算法。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 16;15(10):e47155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47155. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Improvement in Accuracy and Concordance of American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) Scoring Assignment over a 11 Year Time Period Using Patient BMI as a Comorbidity Finding.使用患者体重指数作为合并症发现,在11年时间内美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)评分分配的准确性和一致性得到改善。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2024 May 22;2024:6989174. doi: 10.1155/2024/6989174. eCollection 2024.
6
American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification significantly affects the performances of machine learning models in intraoperative hypotension inference.美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况分类对术中低血压推断的机器学习模型的性能有显著影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Feb;92:111309. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111309. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
7
A System for Automated Determination of Perioperative Patient Acuity.用于自动确定围手术期患者病情严重程度的系统。
J Med Syst. 2018 May 30;42(7):123. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0977-7.
8
One Size Does Not Fit All: A Perspective on the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification for Pediatric Patients.一刀切并不适用:美国麻醉医师协会小儿患者身体状况分类的观点。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1685-1692. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004277.
9
A clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation.一种使用弱监督和深度表示的临床文本分类范式。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0723-6.
10
Automating sedation state assessments using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理自动进行镇静状态评估。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12968. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Structuring and centralizing breast cancer real-world biomarker data from pathology reports through C-LAB artificial intelligence platform.通过C-LAB人工智能平台构建并集中来自病理报告的乳腺癌真实世界生物标志物数据。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 25;11:20552076251323110. doi: 10.1177/20552076251323110. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Stratified Evaluation of GPT's Question Answering in Surgery Reveals Artificial Intelligence (AI) Knowledge Gaps.对GPT在外科手术中问答的分层评估揭示了人工智能(AI)的知识差距。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 14;15(11):e48788. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48788. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Assessing the Utility of a Machine-Learning Model to Assist With the Assignment of the American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification in Pediatric Patients.评估机器学习模型在协助美国麻醉医师协会体格状况分类在儿科患者中的应用。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 1;139(5):1017-1026. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006761. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments.
比较 ChatGPT 和 GPT-4 在 USMLE 软技能评估中的表现。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 1;13(1):16492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43436-9.
4
Prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification from preoperative clinical text narratives using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术从术前临床文本叙述中预测美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02248-0.
5
Large language models in anaesthesiology: use of ChatGPT for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.麻醉学中的大语言模型:使用ChatGPT进行美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;131(3):e73-e75. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.052. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Leveraging pre-trained language models for mining microbiome-disease relationships.利用预训练语言模型挖掘微生物组-疾病关系。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Jul 19;24(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05411-z.
7
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine.GPT-4作为医学人工智能聊天机器人的益处、局限性和风险
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1233-1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184.
8
Development and validation of a machine learning ASA-score to identify candidates for comprehensive preoperative screening and risk stratification.用于识别全面术前筛查和风险分层候选者的机器学习美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分的开发与验证
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Aug;87:111103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111103. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
A comparative study of pretrained language models for long clinical text.基于预训练语言模型的长临床文本比较研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):340-347. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac225.
10
Discordant American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification between anesthesiologists and surgeons and its correlation with adverse patient outcomes.麻醉师和外科医生的美国麻醉师协会体格状况分类不一致及其与患者不良结局的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 2;12(1):7110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10736-5.