Evans B K, Harding K G, Marks J, Ribeiro C D
J Clin Hosp Pharm. 1985 Sep;10(3):289-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1985.tb00926.x.
The efficiency of four commonly used antiseptics, chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, cetrimide and sodium hypochlorite was compared in the disinfection of silicone-foam dressing used in the management of open granulating wounds. An in vitro model was first used to determine the minimum effective concentration of each antiseptic in killing a standard culture of Pseudomonas. The appropriate concentrations were then compared in comparative studies of clinical wounds. Chlorhexidine proved to be the most effective antiseptic, povidone-iodine and cetrimide were moderately successful, but sodium hypochlorite gave poor results. A subsidiary study looked at the problem of wound irritation by carry-over of the antiseptic. A rinse of the dressing after disinfection prevented irritation by chlorhexidine without compromising its antibacterial effect, but this procedure sometimes failed to prevent irritation when using the other antiseptic agents. It is concluded that chlorhexidine is the preferred cleansing agent in the management of silicone-foam dressings on both grounds of bacteriological efficiency and lack of wound irritation. It should be noted that Hibitane concentrate used in this work contains non-ionic detergent and a stabilizing agent. Pure preparations of chlorhexidine may not behave similarly.
比较了四种常用防腐剂(洗必泰、聚维酮碘、西曲溴铵和次氯酸钠)对用于开放性肉芽创面处理的硅酮泡沫敷料的消毒效果。首先使用体外模型确定每种防腐剂杀灭铜绿假单胞菌标准培养物的最低有效浓度。然后在临床伤口的比较研究中比较合适的浓度。结果表明,洗必泰是最有效的防腐剂,聚维酮碘和西曲溴铵效果中等,但次氯酸钠效果不佳。一项辅助研究探讨了防腐剂残留引起伤口刺激的问题。消毒后冲洗敷料可防止洗必泰引起刺激,且不影响其抗菌效果,但使用其他防腐剂时,此方法有时无法防止刺激。结论是,基于细菌学效率和无伤口刺激这两个原因,洗必泰是处理硅酮泡沫敷料的首选清洁剂。应当注意,本研究中使用的洗必泰浓缩液含有非离子洗涤剂和稳定剂。纯洗必泰制剂可能表现不同。