Division of Human Nutrition, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences - DEFENS, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Department of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Clin Nutr. 2024 Nov;43(11):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.037. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Breast cancer (BC) is frequently linked with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and sarcopenia. Therefore, measuring or accurately estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) is crucial for tailoring nutritional needs, managing weight and prevent under- or over-nutrition. We aimed to measure and compare REE between women with BC and a matched control group. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of selected formulas was evaluated.
Women aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosis of BC (stage 0-III) and body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Anthropometry, indirect calorimetry, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were performed. Patients with BC data were compared to healthy women with similar age and BMI range. Measured REE (mREE) was compared against 15 predictive equations. Agreement between methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.
We included 106 women with BC (age 49.9 ± 11.1 years and BMI 24.5 ± 2.8 kg/m) and 75 women as control group. There were no differences in age, anthropometry, and BIA variables between groups, except for percentage fat mass. Measured REE values, alone and adjusted for fat-free mass (FFM) and age, were higher in patients with BC compared to controls (+4.3 % and +6.1 %, respectively). Regarding REE prediction, most of the selected equations underestimated mREE. Precision varied widely, with the two Marra equations showing the highest agreement (73 % and 74.5 %) along with the Müller equation (74 %), however, the wide limit of agreement range indicates substantial variability.
Women with early-stage BC exhibited higher mREE compared to controls, albeit its clinical significance is unknown. None of the selected predictive equations provided accurate and precise REE estimates in this group. Although the Marra equation displayed the highest agreement, further studies are needed to evaluate REE variability and its prediction in women with BC.
乳腺癌(BC)常与肥胖、代谢综合征和肌肉减少症相关。因此,测量或准确估计静息能量消耗(REE)对于定制营养需求、管理体重和预防营养不足或过度至关重要。我们旨在测量和比较 BC 患者与匹配对照组之间的 REE。此外,还评估了选定公式的预测准确性。
本横断面分析纳入了新诊断为 BC(0-III 期)且体重指数(BMI)≤30kg/m²的年龄≥18 岁的女性。进行了人体测量学、间接测热法和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)。将 BC 患者的数据与年龄和 BMI 范围相似的健康女性进行比较。测量的 REE(mREE)与 15 个预测公式进行比较。使用 Bland-Altman 分析评估方法之间的一致性。
我们纳入了 106 名 BC 患者(年龄 49.9±11.1 岁,BMI 24.5±2.8kg/m²)和 75 名对照组女性。两组在年龄、人体测量学和 BIA 变量方面无差异,除了体脂肪百分比。与对照组相比,BC 患者的测量 REE 值(未调整和调整 FFM 和年龄后)分别高 4.3%和 6.1%。关于 REE 预测,大多数选定的公式均低估了 mREE。精确度差异很大,Marra 两个公式(分别为 73%和 74.5%)和 Müller 公式(74%)的一致性最高,但宽的差值范围表明存在较大的变异性。
与对照组相比,早期 BC 女性表现出更高的 mREE,但其临床意义尚不清楚。在该组中,没有一个选定的预测公式能够提供准确和精确的 REE 估计。虽然 Marra 公式显示出最高的一致性,但仍需要进一步研究来评估 BC 女性的 REE 变异性及其预测。