• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在服务不足人群中使用龋病风险评估工具:一项范围综述

Utilization of caries risk assessment tools within the underserved population: a scoping review.

作者信息

Park Mariam, Patel Foram, Santos Maria Jacinta, Tikhonova Svetlana, Athanasakos Alexia, Jessani Abbas

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 2;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05637-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05637-8
PMID:40025488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872313/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Caries Risk Assessment (CRA) tools can be utilised to assess caries risk levels within underserved individuals to provide risk-based caries management. With no previous review mapping the evidence of CRA tools in underserved populations, a scoping review was conducted to provide a comprehensive view of the current literature and the utilisation of CRA tools in underserved populations. The main objectives of this review are as follows: (1) to comprehensively review CRA tools utilised, and (2) to highlight the important findings indicating the oral health status of underserved population subgroups.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest). All relevant English-language papers published between January 2004 to June 2024 were identified. Retrieved references were imported and underwent 2-stage screening. The type of CRA tool was extracted as the primary outcome and oral health status of underserved subgroups were extracted as the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies and nine different CRA tools were identified. Included studies examined caries risk in low-income families, people with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, refugees, veterans, and rural communities. Most studies indicated moderate to high caries risk and significant unmet oral health needs in underserved populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The underserved populations experience elevated caries risk and poor oral health status that require the attention of policymakers and practitioners. Significant heterogeneity across the utilised CRA tools was identified. Future research focusing on developing a standardised and appropriately validated CRA tool that can be utilised is necessary.

摘要

目的

龋病风险评估(CRA)工具可用于评估服务不足人群的龋病风险水平,以提供基于风险的龋病管理。由于此前没有综述梳理服务不足人群中CRA工具的证据,因此进行了一项范围综述,以全面了解当前文献以及CRA工具在服务不足人群中的应用情况。本综述的主要目的如下:(1)全面回顾所使用的CRA工具;(2)突出显示表明服务不足人群亚组口腔健康状况的重要发现。

方法

使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、谷歌学术和全球学位论文数据库(ProQuest)进行系统检索。确定了2004年1月至2024年6月期间发表的所有相关英文论文。将检索到的参考文献导入并进行两阶段筛选。提取CRA工具的类型作为主要结果,提取服务不足亚组的口腔健康状况作为次要结果。

结果

共确定了26项研究和9种不同的CRA工具。纳入的研究调查了低收入家庭、残疾人、原住民、难民、退伍军人和农村社区的龋病风险。大多数研究表明,服务不足人群的龋病风险为中度至高度,口腔健康需求未得到满足的情况严重。

结论

服务不足人群的龋病风险较高,口腔健康状况较差,这需要政策制定者和从业者予以关注。已确定所使用的CRA工具存在显著异质性。有必要开展未来研究,重点开发一种可使用的标准化且经过适当验证的CRA工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803a/11872313/6968d9751475/12903_2025_5637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803a/11872313/6968d9751475/12903_2025_5637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803a/11872313/6968d9751475/12903_2025_5637_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of caries risk assessment tools within the underserved population: a scoping review.在服务不足人群中使用龋病风险评估工具:一项范围综述
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 2;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05637-8.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A systematic review to inform the development of a Canadian caries risk assessment tool for use by primary healthcare providers.一项旨在为加拿大初级保健提供者开发龋齿风险评估工具提供信息的系统评价。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Nov;31(6):767-791. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12776. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
How useful are current caries risk assessment tools in informing the oral health care decision-making process?当前的龋齿风险评估工具在为口腔保健决策过程提供信息方面有多大用处?
J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Feb;150(2):91-102.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.11.011.
6
Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review.标准化龋病风险评估模型在评估实际龋病状况和未来龋病进展方面是否有效?一项系统评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jul 16;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0585-4.
7
Healthcare providers' perspectives on the Canadian Caries Risk Assessment Tool implementation in Indigenous pediatric primary care: a qualitative study.医疗服务提供者对加拿大龋病风险评估工具在原住民儿科初级保健中实施情况的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 10;25(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06036-9.
8
Updates on Caries Risk Assessment-A Literature Review.龋病风险评估的最新进展——文献综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;12(10):312. doi: 10.3390/dj12100312.
9
A systematic review of risk assessment tools for early childhood caries: is there evidence?关于幼儿龋齿风险评估工具的系统评价:有证据吗?
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00480-2. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
More than clean teeth! Identifying factors that contribute to the development of early childhood caries.不止是清洁牙齿!识别导致幼儿龋齿发生的因素。
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):87-88. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01009-3. Epub 2024 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral Health Equity for Global LGBTQ+ Communities: A Call for Urgent Action.全球LGBTQ+社群的口腔健康公平:呼吁立即行动
Int Dent J. 2025 Feb;75(1):17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Methods used for caries detection and diagnosis in Ontario dental practices: a cross-sectional survey.安大略省牙科诊所龋病检测和诊断方法:横断面调查。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04934-y.
3
SEQUEL: Prevalence of dental caries in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review and -analysis.后续研究:沙特阿拉伯龋齿患病率:系统评价与分析
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jul;36(7):963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
An Observation Study of Caries Experience and Potential Risk Assessments among Disabled Individuals Living in an Institutional Rehabilitation Centre.一项对居住在机构康复中心的残疾人龋齿经历及潜在风险评估的观察性研究。
Life (Basel). 2024 May 9;14(5):605. doi: 10.3390/life14050605.
5
Influence of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Tools on Treatment Decision-Making in Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review of Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes.人工智能驱动的诊断工具对幼儿龋齿治疗决策的影响:准确性和临床结果的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;11(9):214. doi: 10.3390/dj11090214.
6
Higher prevalence of dental caries and periodontal problems among refugees: A scoping review.难民中龋齿和牙周问题的患病率较高:范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 15;13:04111. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04111.
7
Survival Rate of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Restorations in Primary Posterior Teeth in Children with High Risk of Caries in the Republic of Kosovo-1-Year Follow-up.科索沃共和国高龋风险儿童乳后牙非创伤性修复治疗修复体的存留率——1年随访
Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):902-909. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757907. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Caries risk and social determinants of health: A big data report.龋齿风险与健康的社会决定因素:一份大数据报告。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Feb;154(2):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Caries Risk Assessment Using the Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) Protocol among the General Population of Sakaka, Saudi Arabia-A Cross-Sectional Study.使用龋病风险评估管理(CAMBRA)方案评估沙特阿拉伯 Sakaka 普通人群的龋病风险:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1215. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031215.
10
A cross-sectional cariogram-based comparison of caries risk profile in children with various levels of intellectual disability.基于龋病风险剖面的不同智力残疾程度儿童的龋齿风险状况的横断面比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):358-362. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_305_21.