Suppr超能文献

卵巢附件报告和数据系统、卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法及哥本哈根指数在卵巢癌术前预测中的诊断性能:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Diagnostic performances of the Ovarian Adnexal Reporting and Data System, the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm, and the Copenhagen Index in the preoperative prediction of ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Vo Thi Quynh Nhu, Tran Doan Tu, Nguyen Tran Thao Nguyen, Vo Van Duc, Le Minh Tam, Nguyen Vu Quoc Huy

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e30. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e30. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Copenhagen Index (CPH-I), and Ovarian Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for the preoperative prediction of ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 462 patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors admitted to the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, and Hue Central Hospital from May 2020 to December 2022. ROMA and CPH-I were calculated using cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) levels, and patient characteristics (age and menopausal status). O-RADS criteria were applied to describe ovarian tumor characteristics from ultrasound findings. Compared with histopathological results, the predictive values of ROMA, CPH-I, and O-RADS alone or in combination with CA125/HE4 for OC were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 462 patients, 381 had benign tumors, 11 had borderline tumors, and 50 had OC. At optimal cut-off points, ROMA's and CPH-I's areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.880 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.846-0.909) and 0.890 (95% CI=0.857-0.918), respectively, and ROMA and CPH-I sensitivities/specificities (Se/Sp) were 68.85%/95.01% and 77.05%/91.08%, respectively. O-RADS ≥3 yielded an AUCs of 0.949 (95% CI=0.924-0.968), with Se/Sp of 88.52%/88.98% (p<0.001). Combining O-RADS with CA125 demonstrated the highest predictive value, with AUCs of 0.969 (95% CI=0.949-0.983) and Se/Sp of 98.36%/86.09% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ROMA, CPH-I, O-RADS, O-RADS + CA125, and O-RADS + HE4 models demonstrated good predictive values for OC; the combination of O-RADS and CA125 yielded the highest values.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA)、哥本哈根指数(CPH-I)和卵巢附件报告与数据系统(O-RADS)对卵巢癌(OC)术前预测的诊断性能。

方法

对2020年5月至2022年12月在顺化医科大学药学院医院和顺化中央医院妇产科收治的462例诊断为卵巢肿瘤的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。使用癌抗原125(CA125)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)水平及患者特征(年龄和绝经状态)计算ROMA和CPH-I。应用O-RADS标准根据超声检查结果描述卵巢肿瘤特征。与组织病理学结果相比,计算ROMA、CPH-I和O-RADS单独或与CA125/HE4联合用于OC的预测值。

结果

462例患者中,381例为良性肿瘤,11例为交界性肿瘤,50例为OC。在最佳截断点时,ROMA和CPH-I的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.880(95%置信区间[CI]=0.846-0.909)和0.890(95%CI=0.857-0.918),ROMA和CPH-I的敏感度/特异度(Se/Sp)分别为68.85%/95.01%和77.05%/91.08%。O-RADS≥3的AUC为0.949(95%CI=0.924-0.968),Se/Sp为88.52%/88.98%(p<0.001)。将O-RADS与CA125联合显示出最高预测价值,AUC为0.969(95%CI=0.949-0.983),Se/Sp为98.36%/86.9%(p<0.001)。

结论

ROMA、CPH-I、O-RADS、O-RADS+CA125和O-RADS+HE4模型对OC均显示出良好预测价值;O-RADS与CA125联合的预测价值最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4818/11964957/6f38e872f840/jgo-36-e30-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验