• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个与高中生共同开展同意及健康关系干预真实协同设计的参与框架。

An engagement framework for the authentic co-design of a consent and healthy relationships intervention with upper-secondary students.

作者信息

Pantaleo Ashleigh M, Dzidic Peta L, Newnham Elizabeth, Chih HuiJun, Wells Robert, Olson Brad, Langley Sarah, Schonfeld Adrian, Hendriks Jacqueline

机构信息

Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.

Curtin Gender Research Network, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 13;6:1420895. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1420895. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frph.2024.1420895
PMID:39345836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11427430/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this demand driven research is to co-design an intervention for upper-secondary students that addresses issues of consent and healthy relationships. In this paper, we (university researchers, student co-researchers, school staff), present the engagement framework that has been critical to the project's development and planned implementation.

METHODS

An iterative co-design approach grounded in a participatory research approach is currently being adopted. Student co-researchers from three independent secondary schools on Whadjuk Nyungar Country in Boorloo/Perth, Western Australia, have been engaged as co-researchers in the design of the intervention. Supplementary quantitative and qualitative data from students enrolled at each school site is also being collated to further inform the intervention design. Student co-researchers will provide insights on the overarching design of the intervention including: the scope of key concepts they want to learn, interpretation of supplementary data, and the development of contextually relevant educative content.

RESULTS

Retrospective and prospective components of the engagement framework are described and supported with applied examples where applicable. Preliminary results demonstrate the imperative of adopting iterative co-design, and the efficacy of our authentic engagement framework. A draft intervention has been formalized and will soon undergo piloting. The co-design process has already resulted in an intervention that differs from the initial program first conceptualized by university researchers.

CONCLUSION

Imperative to our engagement framework is centering students as experts of their lived experience. It is anticipated that this engagement framework will provide insights around the feasibility, value, and necessity for authentic engagement of upper-secondary school students in the design of their consent and healthy relationship education.

摘要

引言

这项需求驱动型研究的目标是共同设计一项针对高中生的干预措施,以解决同意和健康关系问题。在本文中,我们(大学研究人员、学生共同研究人员、学校工作人员)展示了对该项目的发展和计划实施至关重要的参与框架。

方法

目前正在采用一种基于参与式研究方法的迭代式共同设计方法。来自西澳大利亚州布鲁洛/珀斯的瓦贾克·尼永加地区三所独立中学的学生共同研究人员参与了干预措施的设计。还在整理来自每个学校站点注册学生的补充定量和定性数据,以进一步为干预措施设计提供信息。学生共同研究人员将对干预措施的总体设计提供见解,包括:他们想要学习的关键概念的范围、补充数据的解读以及与背景相关的教育内容的开发。

结果

描述了参与框架的回顾性和前瞻性组成部分,并在适用的情况下用实际例子加以支持。初步结果表明采用迭代式共同设计的必要性以及我们真实参与框架的有效性。一项干预措施草案已经确定,很快将进行试点。共同设计过程已经产生了一项与大学研究人员最初构思的项目不同的干预措施。

结论

我们参与框架的关键是将学生作为其生活经历的专家置于中心位置。预计该参与框架将围绕高中生在同意和健康关系教育设计中真实参与的可行性、价值和必要性提供见解。

相似文献

1
An engagement framework for the authentic co-design of a consent and healthy relationships intervention with upper-secondary students.一个与高中生共同开展同意及健康关系干预真实协同设计的参与框架。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 13;6:1420895. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1420895. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Partnering with Indigenous student co-researchers: improving research processes and outcomes.与原住民学生共同研究者合作:改善研究过程与成果。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Jul 27;74:27838. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27838. eCollection 2015.
4
Peering in: youth perspectives on Health Promoting Schools and youth engagement in Nova Scotia, Canada.一窥究竟:加拿大新斯科舍省促进健康学校与青少年参与的青年视角。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac081.
5
Whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence, and improve educational attainment: a systematic review.促进学生对学校的承诺以预防药物使用和暴力、提高教育程度的全校干预措施:系统评价。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(2):1-290. doi: 10.3310/DWTR3299.
6
Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research.共同设计模拟并分析过程,以确定儿童残疾研究中真实且有意义的研究参与原则。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 9;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y.
7
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
A Web-Based Intervention to Prevent Multiple Chronic Disease Risk Factors Among Adolescents: Co-Design and User Testing of the Health4Life School-Based Program.一项基于网络的干预措施,用于预防青少年多种慢性病风险因素:健康4Life校本项目的协同设计与用户测试
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jul 28;4(7):e19485. doi: 10.2196/19485.
10
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.

本文引用的文献

1
Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey.不同类型和类别的施害者对儿童的性虐待:来自澳大利亚全国性调查的流行率和趋势。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jan;147:106562. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106562. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review.关键定性研究的方法完整性:支持设计和研究审查的原则。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Apr;68(3):357-370. doi: 10.1037/cou0000523.
3
Participatory Research Approaches with Youth: Ethics, Engagement, and Meaningful Action.参与式研究方法与青年:伦理、参与和有意义的行动。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):142-153. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12501. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Lessons Learned in Implementing Youth and Parent Participatory Action Research in a School-Based Intervention.在学校干预中实施青少年和家长参与式行动研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):15-36. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0002.
5
Youth Participatory Approaches and Health Equity: Conceptualization and Integrative Review.青年参与式方法与健康公平性:概念化与综合评论。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):267-278. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12451. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Youth Participatory Action Research Implementation in U.S. High Schools.美国高中实施青年参与式行动研究的定性系统评价
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Mar;65(1-2):242-257. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12389. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
More than Data Collectors: A Systematic Review of the Environmental Outcomes of Youth Inquiry Approaches in the United States.超越数据收集者:美国青年探究方法对环境结果的系统评价。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;63(1-2):208-226. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12321.
8
A Systematic Review of Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, Youth Outcomes, and Future Directions.一项关于美国青年参与式行动研究(YPAR)的系统评价:方法、青年成果和未来方向。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Dec;45(6):865-878. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769357. Epub 2018 May 11.
9
Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing.我们的未来:《柳叶刀》青少年健康与福祉委员会
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?父母为何同意或拒绝青少年参与性行为研究?
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 May;45(5):1020-36. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0445-y. Epub 2016 Feb 24.