Ozaka Sotaro, Takahashi Haruhiko, Shimomori Yuta, Kagoshima Yomei, Terashi Shohei, Tsutsumi Koshiro, Sagami Ryota, Hirashita Yuka, Fukuda Kensuke, Ogawa Ryo, Kodama Masaaki, Murakami Kazunari, Mizukami Kazuhiro
Department of Gastroenterology Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita Japan.
DEN Open. 2024 Sep 29;5(1):e70022. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70022. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Since a standard sedation protocol for pediatric colonoscopy (CS) has not been established, evidence on optimal sedative agents is needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thiamylal in sedation for pediatric CS compared to midazolam.
Children from 7 to 16 years of age who underwent CS under sedation with intravenous thiamylal or midazolam at our hospital between June 2010 and March 2024 were included in this retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was the efficacy (success rate of CS without mid-awakening) of the drugs. Meanwhile, the secondary outcomes were the sedation level during CS, procedure time, recovery time, and adverse events related to sedation.
Sixty children were included in the study. The success rate of CS without mid-awakening was significantly higher in the thiamylal group (90.6%) than in the midazolam group (64.3%; = 0.03). The two groups had no significant differences in median sedation depth, procedure time, or recovery time. Adverse events related to sedation in thiamylal group (22%) and midazolam group (25%) were similar. No severe adverse events were reported.
Intravenous thiamylal provides effective and safe sedation in children requiring CS, with little or no mid-awakening during the procedure.
由于尚未建立小儿结肠镜检查(CS)的标准镇静方案,因此需要有关最佳镇静药物的证据。本研究旨在评估硫喷妥钠与咪达唑仑相比在小儿CS镇静中的有效性和安全性。
本回顾性观察性研究纳入了2010年6月至2024年3月期间在我院接受静脉注射硫喷妥钠或咪达唑仑镇静下进行CS的7至16岁儿童。主要结局是药物的有效性(无中途觉醒的CS成功率)。同时,次要结局是CS期间的镇静水平、操作时间、恢复时间以及与镇静相关的不良事件。
60名儿童纳入研究。硫喷妥钠组无中途觉醒的CS成功率(90.6%)显著高于咪达唑仑组(64.3%;P = 0.03)。两组在中位镇静深度、操作时间或恢复时间方面无显著差异。硫喷妥钠组(22%)和咪达唑仑组(25%)与镇静相关的不良事件相似。未报告严重不良事件。
静脉注射硫喷妥钠可为需要CS的儿童提供有效且安全的镇静,术中很少或没有中途觉醒。