Suppr超能文献

尼泊尔一家三级护理医院急诊科新手医生运用床旁肺部超声诊断创伤性气胸的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Detecting Traumatic Pneumothorax by Novice Physicians in the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal.

作者信息

Malla Monisma, Purna Shrestha Anmol, Prasad Shrestha Shailesh, Shrestha Roshana

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavrepalanchowk, Bagmati Province, Nepal.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2024 Sep 19;2024:9956637. doi: 10.1155/2024/9956637. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic pneumothorax is a life-threatening condition requiring vigilant clinical assessment and urgent management. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is considered to be a safer, rapid, and accurate modality for the early diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. The principle objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of bedside LUS performed by trained novice physicians in the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax as compared to supine chest X-rays (CXRs) and/or computed tomography (CT) scans and/or air leak during needle/tube thoracostomy as composite standard.

METHODS

It is a prospective, cross-sectional, single-blinded study using a nonprobability quota sampling technique. A total of 96 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with polytrauma and chest injuries within a period of twelve months were included. The diagnostic accuracy of bedside LUS performed by trained novice physicians was calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) and compared with the composite standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of LUS in diagnosing traumatic pneumothorax as compared to the composite standard was 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.05%-100.00%), whereas its specificity was 97.75% (95% CI: 92.12%-99.73%). Similarly, the PPV and NPV of LUS were 77.7% (95% CI: 39.99%-97.19%) and 100% (95% CI: 95.85%-100.00%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study showed that the application of LUS in detecting traumatic pneumothorax had similar diagnostic accuracy as supine CXR. Bedside LUS is widely available, portable, and inexpensive. It also has the capability of real-time imaging and can be repeated as necessary with less risk of radiation exposure. Therefore, physicians working in tertiary and rural health institutions must be trained adequately in order to uplift the clinical utility of LUS for the timely and cost-effective detection of traumatic pneumothorax.

摘要

引言

创伤性气胸是一种危及生命的疾病,需要进行警惕的临床评估和紧急处理。肺部超声(LUS)被认为是早期诊断创伤性气胸更安全、快速且准确的方法。本研究的主要目的是评估由经过培训的新手医生进行的床边LUS诊断创伤性气胸的准确性,并与仰卧位胸部X线(CXR)和/或计算机断层扫描(CT)以及/或针/管胸腔造口术期间的漏气情况作为复合标准进行比较。

方法

这是一项采用非概率配额抽样技术的前瞻性横断面单盲研究。纳入了在十二个月内到急诊科(ED)就诊的96例多发伤和胸部损伤患者。由经过培训的新手医生进行的床边LUS的诊断准确性通过敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)进行计算,并与复合标准进行比较。

结果

与复合标准相比,LUS诊断创伤性气胸的敏感性为100%(95%置信区间(CI):59.05%-100.00%),而其特异性为97.75%(95%CI:92.12%-99.73%)。同样,LUS的PPV和NPV分别为77.7%(95%CI:39.99%-97.19%)和100%(95%CI:95.85%-100.00%)。

结论

研究结果表明,LUS在检测创伤性气胸中的应用与仰卧位CXR具有相似的诊断准确性。床边LUS广泛可用、便于携带且价格低廉。它还具有实时成像能力,并且可以根据需要重复进行,辐射暴露风险较小。因此,在三级和农村医疗机构工作的医生必须接受充分培训,以提高LUS在及时且经济高效地检测创伤性气胸中的临床效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab0/11427713/e0fabdd4f44f/EMI2024-9956637.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验