Sección de Medicina de Urgencia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):362-370. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
Rapid evaluation for pneumothorax is a common clinical priority. Although lung ultrasound (LUS) often is used to assess for pneumothorax, its diagnostic accuracy varies based on patient and provider factors. To enhance the performance of LUS for pulmonary pathologic features, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging has been adopted; however, the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted LUS (AI-LUS) deployed in real time to diagnose pneumothorax remains unknown.
In patients with suspected pneumothorax, what is the real-time diagnostic accuracy of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding?
We performed a prospective AI-assisted diagnostic accuracy study of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding in a convenience sample of patients with suspected pneumothorax. After calibrating the model parameters and imaging settings for bedside deployment, we prospectively evaluated its diagnostic accuracy for lung sliding compared with a reference standard of expert consensus.
Two hundred forty-one lung sliding evaluations were derived from 62 patients. AI-LUS showed a sensitivity of 0.921 (95% CI, 0.792-0.973), specificity of 0.802 (95% CI, 0.735-0.856), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.885 (95% CI, 0.828-0.956), and accuracy of 0.824 (95% CI, 0.766-0.870) for the diagnosis of absent lung sliding.
In this study, real-time AI-LUS showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity to identify the absence of lung sliding. Further research to improve model performance and optimize the integration of AI-LUS into existing diagnostic pathways is warranted.
快速评估气胸是临床常见的重点。尽管肺部超声(LUS)常用于评估气胸,但由于患者和提供者因素的影响,其诊断准确性存在差异。为了提高 LUS 对肺部病理特征的检测性能,已经采用了人工智能(AI)辅助成像;然而,实时部署的 AI 辅助 LUS(AI-LUS)诊断气胸的准确性尚不清楚。
在疑似气胸的患者中,实时 AI-LUS 诊断无肺滑动的准确性如何?
我们对 AI-LUS 进行了一项前瞻性 AI 辅助诊断准确性研究,以评估疑似气胸患者的床边模型参数和成像设置校准后,其诊断无肺滑动的准确性与专家共识的参考标准进行比较。
从 62 名患者中得出了 241 次肺滑动评估。AI-LUS 的敏感性为 0.921(95%CI,0.792-0.973),特异性为 0.802(95%CI,0.735-0.856),受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.885(95%CI,0.828-0.956),诊断无肺滑动的准确率为 0.824(95%CI,0.766-0.870)。
在这项研究中,实时 AI-LUS 对识别无肺滑动具有较高的敏感性和中等特异性。需要进一步的研究来提高模型性能,并优化 AI-LUS 与现有诊断途径的整合。