Suppr超能文献

不同正畸粘结剂与牙釉质剪切粘结强度的研究。

Investigation of the Shear Bond Strength of Different Orthodontic Adhesives to Enamel.

作者信息

Abutayyem Huda

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2473-S2475. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_323_24. Epub 2024 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic adhesives to enamel is a critical factor in the success of orthodontic treatment. Various adhesives are available in the market, each with different trade names and claimed properties that could influence their bond strength. Understanding these differences is essential for clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 60 freshly extracted human premolars were collected and randomly divided into four groups: Group A (Adhesive X-Trade Name: BondPlus), Group B (Adhesive Y-Trade Name: OrthoBond), Group C (Adhesive Z-Trade Name: PowerBond), and Group D (Control). The enamel surfaces were cleaned, polished, and etched following standard protocols. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the teeth using the respective adhesives according to the manufacturer's instructions. A universal testing machine was employed to measure the SBS, and the data were analyzed using ANOVA with post-hoc tests.

RESULTS

The mean SBS values (MPa) were as follows: Group A = 15.2, Group B = 14.8, Group C = 16.5, and Group D (Control) =10.3. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the groups ( < 0.05). Post-hoc tests indicated that Group C exhibited significantly higher SBS compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that among the orthodontic adhesives tested, PowerBond demonstrated superior shear bond strength to the enamel. However, further research is warranted to explore other aspects of adhesive performance and clinical implications.

摘要

背景

正畸粘合剂与牙釉质之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)是正畸治疗成功的关键因素。市场上有各种粘合剂,每种都有不同的商品名和声称的特性,这些特性可能会影响它们的粘结强度。了解这些差异对于临床决策至关重要。

材料与方法

在本研究中,收集了60颗新鲜拔除的人类前磨牙,并随机分为四组:A组(粘合剂X - 商品名:BondPlus),B组(粘合剂Y - 商品名:OrthoBond),C组(粘合剂Z - 商品名:PowerBond)和D组(对照组)。按照标准方案清洁、抛光和蚀刻牙釉质表面。根据制造商的说明,使用相应的粘合剂将正畸托槽粘结到牙齿上。使用万能试验机测量SBS,并使用方差分析和事后检验对数据进行分析。

结果

平均SBS值(MPa)如下:A组 = 15.2,B组 = 14.8,C组 = 16.5,D组(对照组) = 10.3。统计分析显示各组之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。事后检验表明,与其他组相比,C组表现出显著更高的SBS。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在所测试的正畸粘合剂中,PowerBond对牙釉质表现出卓越的剪切粘结强度。然而,有必要进一步研究以探索粘合剂性能的其他方面及其临床意义。

相似文献

1
Investigation of the Shear Bond Strength of Different Orthodontic Adhesives to Enamel.不同正畸粘结剂与牙釉质剪切粘结强度的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2473-S2475. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_323_24. Epub 2024 May 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验