Suppr超能文献

不同隐形矫治器治疗中的附件磨损:一项对比研究。

Attachment Wear in Different Clear Aligner Therapy: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Krishna Kanuru Ravi, Adarsh Kumar, Krishna N Mothi, Chacko Prince K, Datla Praveen Kumar Varma, Tiwari Rahul

机构信息

Department of Orthodontist, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental School, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2770-S2772. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_398_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of its ease and visual attractiveness, clear aligner therapy has grown in popularity as an orthodontic treatment option. On the other hand, the results of therapy may be impacted by attachment wear. Comparing attachment wear in three distinct clear aligner systems-System A, System B, and System C-was the goal of this investigation.

METHODS

The research comprised 60 individuals receiving clear aligners as part of their orthodontic treatment. Depending on whatever clear aligner system was being utilised, the patients were split into three groups. Attachment wear was evaluated using a standardised scoring method regularly. The various systems' attachment wear was compared using statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to Systems B and C, System A showed less attachment wear. There were notable variations in attachment wear ratings between the systems. System C's attachments had the most wear, whereas System A's attachments had the least.

CONCLUSION

Different clear aligner systems showed varying degrees of attachment wear, with System A exhibiting the least amount of wear. To maximise treatment procedures and guarantee treatment efficacy and longevity in clear aligner therapy, it is vital to comprehend attachment wear patterns.

摘要

背景

由于其简便性和视觉吸引力,透明矫治器疗法作为一种正畸治疗选择越来越受欢迎。另一方面,治疗结果可能会受到附件磨损的影响。本研究的目的是比较三种不同的透明矫治器系统——A系统、B系统和C系统——的附件磨损情况。

方法

该研究包括60名接受透明矫治器作为正畸治疗一部分的个体。根据所使用的透明矫治器系统,将患者分为三组。定期使用标准化评分方法评估附件磨损情况。使用统计分析比较不同系统的附件磨损情况。

结果

与B系统和C系统相比,A系统的附件磨损较少。各系统之间的附件磨损评分存在显著差异。C系统的附件磨损最多,而A系统的附件磨损最少。

结论

不同的透明矫治器系统表现出不同程度的附件磨损,A系统的磨损量最少。了解附件磨损模式对于优化治疗程序以及确保透明矫治器治疗的疗效和持久性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Attachment Wear in Different Clear Aligner Therapy: A Comparative Study.不同隐形矫治器治疗中的附件磨损:一项对比研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2770-S2772. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_398_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
5
Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article.透明矫治器疗法:最新综述文章。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:37. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_30_23. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Tooth Movement with In-House Clear Aligners.自制透明牙套牙齿移动精度的研究。
J World Fed Orthod. 2021 Dec;10(4):177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验