• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道前列腺单极与双极电切术的比较结果:机构视角

Comparative Outcomes of Monopolar and Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: An Institutional Perspective.

作者信息

Wante Mahendra, Mathai Mathew John, Shetty Varun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67947. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.67947
PMID:39347160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436255/
Abstract

Objective This prospective comparative study aimed to highlight and compare two types of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), namely M-TURP (monopolar) and B-TURP (bipolar), in the endoscopic management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods and materials This research was conducted between 2022 and 2023 at a tertiary care health center. Included in the investigation were 100 consenting study participants undergoing M-TURP and B-TURP at our center. All referred patients presenting with clinical, ultrasound, or uroflowmetry features of BPH and those with failed attempts at medical management were included in the study. Patients with carcinoma of the prostate were excluded from the study. Post-operatively, the endpoints for comparison included maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), prostate volume, duration of hospital stay, duration of catheterization, drop in serum sodium concentration, and drop in hemoglobin levels. Descriptive statistics were computed to delineate the study sample. After the completion of data collection, data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0 (Released 2007; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the correlations sought were achieved using the Chi-square test of significance. Results The peak incidence of BPH was seen in the sixth decade of life: the M-TURP group was 65.16 ± 7.07 years (mean ± standard deviation), while that in the B-TURP group was 62.32 ± 8.16 years (mean ± standard deviation). Nine percent of the study participants did not show any comorbidities. The most frequent symptom of BPH at presentation was a poor urinary stream (78%, n = 100), followed by nocturia (67%, n = 100). In our study, patients undergoing M-TURP had a mean serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4.31 ± 1.03 ng/mL, while patients undergoing B-TURP had a mean serum PSA of 4.24 ± 0.99 ng/mL (p = 0.820; p > 0.05). The study found that patients undergoing M-TURP had a mean prostate size of 35.04 ± 3.57 cc, while those undergoing B-TURP had a mean prostate size of 35.72 ± 3.22 cc (p = 0.765). For the B-TURP group, the mean decrease in postoperative serum sodium concentration was 4.3 mEq/L, while for the M-TURP group, it was 6.4 mEq/L (p = 0.903). In the M-TURP group, there were three cases of transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, while the B-TURP group had only one case. Conclusion BPH is a common problem affecting the quality of life of several male patients. Both M-TURP and B-TURP are comparable in their efficacy in treating BPH, with the exception of a higher incidence of hyponatremia and TUR syndrome in the M-TURP group.

摘要

目的 本前瞻性对照研究旨在突出并比较两种经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP),即M-TURP(单极)和B-TURP(双极),用于良性前列腺增生(BPH)的内镜治疗。方法和材料 本研究于2022年至2023年在一家三级医疗保健中心进行。纳入研究的100名同意参与的研究对象在我们中心接受了M-TURP和B-TURP。所有具有BPH临床、超声或尿流率特征且药物治疗失败的转诊患者均纳入研究。前列腺癌患者被排除在研究之外。术后,比较的终点包括最大尿流率(Qmax)、前列腺体积、住院时间、导尿时间、血清钠浓度下降以及血红蛋白水平下降。计算描述性统计量以描述研究样本。数据收集完成后,使用Windows版SPSS 16.0(2007年发布;SPSS公司,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行数据分析,并使用卡方显著性检验来寻求相关性。结果 BPH的发病高峰出现在生命的第六个十年:M-TURP组为65.16±7.07岁(均值±标准差),而B-TURP组为62.32±8.16岁(均值±标准差)。9%的研究对象未显示任何合并症。BPH最常见的症状是尿流不畅(78%,n = 100),其次是夜尿(67%,n = 100)。在我们的研究中,接受M-TURP的患者血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)平均水平为4.31±1.03 ng/mL,而接受B-TURP的患者血清PSA平均水平为4.24±0.99 ng/mL(p = 0.820;p>0.05)。研究发现,接受M-TURP的患者前列腺平均大小为35.04±3.57 cc,而接受B-TURP的患者前列腺平均大小为35.72±3.22 cc(p = 0.765)。对于B-TURP组,术后血清钠浓度平均下降4.3 mEq/L,而M-TURP组为6.4 mEq/L(p = 0.903)。M-TURP组有3例经尿道切除术(TUR)综合征,而B-TURP组仅有1例。结论 BPH是影响众多男性患者生活质量的常见问题。M-TURP和B-TURP在治疗BPH的疗效方面具有可比性,除了M-TURP组低钠血症和TUR综合征的发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Comparative Outcomes of Monopolar and Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: An Institutional Perspective.经尿道前列腺单极与双极电切术的比较结果:机构视角
Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67947. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Energy delivery systems for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗良性前列腺增生的能量输送系统:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(17):1-121. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
3
Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario.经尿道前列腺单极与双极切除术治疗良性前列腺增生:手术结果与术者偏好,真实世界情况
Urol Ann. 2016 Jul-Sep;8(3):291-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.184900.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Comparative Study.双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的安全性和有效性:一项比较研究。
Urol J. 2015 Dec 23;12(6):2452-6.
5
Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.国际多中心双盲随机对照试验研究双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术围手术期疗效和安全性的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
6
Bipolar transurethral vaporization: a superior procedure in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized comparison with bipolar TURP.双极经尿道汽化术:良性前列腺增生的一种更优术式:与双极经尿道前列腺切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):346-55. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.08.
7
Comparison between a transurethral prostate split and transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment in a small prostate volume: a prospective controlled study.小前列腺体积良性前列腺增生症治疗中经尿道前列腺劈开术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(16):1016. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5462.
8
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Massive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术与等离子前列腺剜除术治疗巨大良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性评价。
Urol Int. 2021;105(9-10):735-742. doi: 10.1159/000511116. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.前列腺动脉栓塞术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的比较
Prostate Int. 2020 Sep;8(3):130-133. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications.一项比较双极等离子经尿道前列腺切除术和单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的前瞻性随机研究:疗效、性功能、生活质量和并发症。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):131-144. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0766.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence and retention in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.帕金森病下尿路症状、尿失禁及尿潴留的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 12;14:977572. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.977572. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgical outcome of male patients with chronic central nervous system disorders and voiding dysfunction due to bladder outlet obstruction.因膀胱出口梗阻导致慢性中枢神经系统疾病和排尿功能障碍的男性患者的手术治疗结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;54(10):2511-2519. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03285-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
Impact on quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: Which urinary symptoms are to blame?多发性硬化症患者生活质量的影响:哪些尿路症状是罪魁祸首?
Prog Urol. 2022 Sep;32(10):711-716. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Updated Cochrane Review.经尿道微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生:Cochrane系统评价的更新
World J Mens Health. 2022 Jan;40(1):127-138. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210115. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
State of the art of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生的前列腺动脉栓塞术的现状。
Gland Surg. 2018 Apr;7(2):188-199. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.03.01.
6
Review of Current Literature for Prostatic Artery Embolization.前列腺动脉栓塞术的当前文献综述
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Sep;33(3):231-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586141.
7
Review of Prostate Anatomy and Embryology and the Etiology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.前列腺解剖学与胚胎学及良性前列腺增生病因学综述
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.012.
8
Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario.经尿道前列腺单极与双极切除术治疗良性前列腺增生:手术结果与术者偏好,真实世界情况
Urol Ann. 2016 Jul-Sep;8(3):291-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.184900.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Large Prostates or Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Post Hoc Analysis of a European Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗大前列腺或严重下尿路症状患者的安全性和有效性:一项欧洲多中心随机对照试验的事后分析
J Urol. 2016 Mar;195(3):677-84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.083. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells.紫杉醇是如何杀死癌细胞的。
Mol Biol Cell. 2014 Sep 15;25(18):2677-81. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0916.