Wang Tianqi, Ma Yu, Du Xiaonan, Li Chunpei, Peng Zhongbi, Wang Yi, Zhou Hao
Department of Neurology National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai China.
Department of Neurological Rehabilitation Guizhou Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Guizhou China.
Pediatr Investig. 2024 Feb 25;8(3):224-236. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12417. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Digital technology is now widely available for the interventions of autism, but its validity and feasibility remain to be proved.
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in improving core symptoms or intelligence quotient in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Three databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched on November 15, 2022. Randomized clinical trials that enrolled patients with ASD who received DHIs and a control group without DHI treatment were included. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to assess the risk of bias.
A total of 33 studies, involving 1285 participants (658 [51.2%] in DHI groups and 627 [48.8%] in control groups), were analyzed to investigate the differences between DHI groups and control groups. Significantly greater improvements in the overall performance of ASD were observed in the DHI groups compared to the control groups (including active, waitlist, treatment-as-usual, and no treatment) with an effect size of 1.89 (Cohen's d 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.52). Studies with treatment-as-usual, waitlist, and no treatment control demonstrated large effect sizes of Cohen's d 3.41 (95% CI: 0.84-5.97), Cohen's d 4.27 (95% CI: 1.95-6.59), and Cohen's d 4.52 (95% CI: 2.98-6.06) respectively. In contrast, studies with active control revealed insignificant effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.73, 95% CI: 0.12-1.33).
This meta-analysis found significantly greater improvements in core symptoms or intelligence quotient in ASD patients receiving DHIs compared to those in control conditions. ASD patients may benefit from the DHIs and reduce the economic burden.
数字技术目前已广泛应用于自闭症干预,但其实效性和可行性仍有待证明。
本研究旨在调查数字健康干预(DHI)对改善自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者核心症状或智商的有效性。
于2022年11月15日检索了包括PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus在内的三个数据库。纳入了随机临床试验,这些试验招募了接受DHI的ASD患者以及未接受DHI治疗的对照组。应用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)评估偏倚风险。
共分析了33项研究,涉及1285名参与者(DHI组658名[51.2%],对照组627名[48.8%]),以研究DHI组与对照组之间的差异。与对照组(包括积极治疗组、候补名单组、常规治疗组和无治疗组)相比,DHI组在ASD总体表现上的改善显著更大,效应量为1.89(Cohen's d 95%置信区间[CI]:1.26 - 2.52)。常规治疗、候补名单和无治疗对照组的研究分别显示出Cohen's d为3.41(95% CI:0.84 - 5.97)、Cohen's d为4.27(95% CI:1.95 - 6.59)和Cohen's d为4.52(95% CI:2.98 - 6.06)的大效应量。相比之下,积极对照组的研究显示效应量不显著(Cohen's d 0.73,95% CI:0.12 - 1.33)。
这项荟萃分析发现,与处于对照条件下的患者相比,接受DHI的ASD患者在核心症状或智商方面有显著更大的改善。ASD患者可能会从DHI中受益并减轻经济负担。