• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Community-Informed Maternal and Infant Health Needs Assessment in Alabama.阿拉巴马州基于社区的母婴健康需求评估。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Nov;28(11):1833-1839. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03988-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study.加强英国国民保健制度产科服务中的公开披露:DISCERN 现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(22):1-159. doi: 10.3310/YTDF8015.
5
Contribution of Health Care Practitioner and Maternity Services Factors to Racial Disparities in Alabama: A Qualitative Study.医疗保健从业者和产妇服务因素对阿拉巴马州种族差异的贡献:一项定性研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 1;142(4):873-885. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005326. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
6
'Closing the Gap': how maternity services can contribute to reducing poor maternal infant health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women.“缩小差距”:产科服务如何助力降低原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民妇女不良母婴健康结局的发生率
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1383. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
7
Unlocking the path to quality maternity care: a qualitative study on work environment dynamics, providers' responsiveness, and professionalism in central region, Malawi.解锁优质孕产妇护理之路:关于马拉维中部地区工作环境动态、提供者响应能力和专业精神的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07525-z.
8
Using normalisation process theory (NPT) to explore implementation of the maternal perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) policy in Uganda: a reflection.利用常态化进程理论(NPT)探讨乌干达母婴围产死亡监测与应对(MPDSR)政策的实施:反思。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 4;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01191-x.
9
Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes.基于社区的干预方案,用于降低孕产妇和新生儿发病率及死亡率,并改善新生儿结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 23;2015(3):CD007754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007754.pub3.
10
Compromised communication: a qualitative study exploring Afghan families and health professionals' experience of interpreting support in Australian maternity care.沟通不畅:一项质性研究,探索阿富汗家庭与健康专业人员在澳大利亚孕产妇护理中对口译支持的体验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):e1. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003837. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Vital Signs: Maternity Care Experiences - United States, April 2023.生命体征:产妇护理体验 - 美国,2023 年 4 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Sep 1;72(35):961-967. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7235e1.
2
Matching of woman and doula, and the generation of trust in an Australian volunteer doula program: Findings from a realist evaluation.产妇与导乐匹配及信任的产生:来自澳大利亚志愿者导乐项目的评估结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5423-e5433. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13965. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.医患种族一致性与新生儿分娩死亡率的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):21194-21200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913405117. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
4
Can respectful maternity care save and improve lives?尊重产妇护理能否拯救生命并改善生活?
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):391-395. doi: 10.1111/birt.12444. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States.《母亲发声研究》:美国妊娠和分娩期间的不平等与虐待现象。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.
6
Maternity care access, quality, and outcomes: A systems-level perspective on research, clinical, and policy needs.孕产妇保健的可及性、质量和结果:从系统层面看研究、临床和政策需求。
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Oct;41(6):367-374. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
7
Recent Increases in the U.S. Maternal Mortality Rate: Disentangling Trends From Measurement Issues.美国孕产妇死亡率近期上升:从测量问题中梳理趋势
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):447-455. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001556.
8
Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?美国孕产妇死亡率和发病率:我们现在处于什么位置?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Jan;23(1):3-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4617.
9
Time and the patient-physician relationship.时间与医患关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S34-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x.

阿拉巴马州基于社区的母婴健康需求评估。

A Community-Informed Maternal and Infant Health Needs Assessment in Alabama.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F, 10360E, 619 19th ST South, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA.

Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama, 350 Marrs Spring Rd, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2024 Nov;28(11):1833-1839. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03988-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-03988-2
PMID:39347873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11534882/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality is a global clinical and public health crisis. Researchers and leading organizations have highlighted the need for local partnerships to implement evidence-based strategies to mitigate poor outcomes. Alabama has the third highest maternal mortality rate in the nation. Research on the complexity of maternity mortality is strengthening, but poor outcomes in Alabama persist and there is limited data highlighting the perspectives of those on the frontlines of providing and receiving care.

PURPOSE

We conducted a qualitative, statewide, community-informed, maternal and infant health research assessment with physicians, providers, professionals, and birthing persons to identify challenges and solutions to addressing the states' poor perinatal health outcomes.   METHODS: Data were collected using a four-phase, research design that included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, one state-wide data sharing event, and five regional data sharing events. Data were collected between January 2020 and October 2021. The data were analyzed using consensus coding and thematic analysis.

MAIN FINDINGS

Fifty-nine (N = 59) individuals participated. Three themes emerged: 1) "They were making me feel so overlooked.": A disconnect between perinatal healthcare services and patient needs; 2) "That shouldn't be something you have to ask for.": Limitations to providing respectful perinatal healthcare; and 3) "If they work together, they can have all the tools they need.": Building a case for collaborative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants advocated for a collaborative perinatal healthcare model that focuses on the provision of respectful, quality perinatal healthcare. Our approach can be applied across contexts and used to support the effective implementation of contextually relevant maternity care practices.

摘要

背景

孕产妇死亡率是全球临床和公共卫生危机。研究人员和主要组织强调需要建立地方伙伴关系,以实施基于证据的战略来减轻不良结果。阿拉巴马州的孕产妇死亡率位居全国第三。关于孕产妇死亡复杂性的研究正在加强,但阿拉巴马州的不良结果仍然存在,而且数据有限,无法突出提供和接受护理的第一线人员的观点。

目的

我们进行了一项全州范围的、社区参与的、以母婴健康为重点的定性研究评估,让医生、提供者、专业人员和分娩者参与,以确定解决该州围产期健康不良结果的挑战和解决方案。

方法

数据收集采用四阶段研究设计,包括半结构化访谈、焦点小组、一次全州数据共享活动和五次区域数据共享活动。数据收集于 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月进行。使用共识编码和主题分析对数据进行分析。

主要发现

共有 59 人(N=59)参与。出现了三个主题:1)“他们让我感到被忽视了。”:围产期医疗服务与患者需求之间存在脱节;2)“这不应该是你必须要求的。”:提供尊重的围产期医疗保健的限制;3)“如果他们共同努力,他们可以拥有所需的所有工具。”:建立合作护理的案例。

结论

参与者倡导建立一种注重提供尊重、高质量围产期医疗保健的合作围产期医疗模式。我们的方法可以在不同的背景下应用,并用于支持有效实施与背景相关的产妇保健实践。