• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产妇与导乐匹配及信任的产生:来自澳大利亚志愿者导乐项目的评估结果。

Matching of woman and doula, and the generation of trust in an Australian volunteer doula program: Findings from a realist evaluation.

机构信息

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Realist Research Evaluation and Learning Initiative, Northern Institute Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5423-e5433. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13965. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13965
PMID:35924682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087570/
Abstract

How women are cared for while pregnant and having a new baby can have profound and lasting effects on their health and well-being. While mainstream maternity care systems aspire to provide care that is woman-centred, women with fewest social and economic resources often have reduced access. Community-based doula support programs offer complementary care for these women and are known to, on average, have positive outcomes. Less understood is how, when and why these programs work. A realist evaluation of an Australian volunteer doula program provided for women experiencing socioeconomic adversity explored these questions. The program provides free non-medical, social, emotional, and practical support by trained doulas during pregnancy, birth and new parenting. This paper reports the testing and refinement of one program theory from the larger study. The theory, previously developed from key informant interviews and rapid realist review of literature, hypothesised that the cultural matching of woman (client) and doula led to best outcomes. This was tested in realist interviews with women and focus groups with doulas, in January-February 2020. Seven English speaking, and six Arabic speaking clients were interviewed. Two focus groups were conducted with a total of eight doulas from diverse cultural and professional backgrounds. Data were analysed in NVivo. The study found cultural matching to be valued by some but not all women, and only when the doula was also genuinely interested, kind, timely and reliable. These approaches (with or without cultural matching) generate trust between the doula and woman. Trust theory, reflexivity theory and social relations theory supported explanatory understanding of the causal contribution of a doula knowing what it takes to build trust, to a woman deciding to trust her doula.

摘要

女性在怀孕期间和新生儿阶段的护理方式对她们的健康和幸福有着深远而持久的影响。虽然主流的孕产妇护理系统旨在提供以女性为中心的护理,但拥有最少社会和经济资源的女性往往获得的护理机会较少。以社区为基础的导乐支持计划为这些女性提供了补充性的护理,并且通常具有积极的效果。然而,这些计划是如何、何时以及为何发挥作用的,人们对此了解甚少。对澳大利亚为经历社会经济困境的女性提供的志愿导乐计划进行的现实主义评估探讨了这些问题。该计划由经过培训的导乐在怀孕期间、分娩期间和新育儿期间提供免费的非医疗、社会、情感和实际支持。本文报告了从更大规模研究中测试和完善的一个计划理论。该理论之前是从关键知情人访谈和对文献的快速现实主义评论中发展而来的,假设女性(客户)和导乐之间的文化匹配会带来最佳结果。这在 2020 年 1 月至 2 月期间通过对女性的现实主义访谈和对来自不同文化和专业背景的八位导乐的焦点小组进行了测试。对 7 名讲英语的和 6 名讲阿拉伯语的客户进行了访谈。总共进行了两次焦点小组讨论,有八位来自不同文化和专业背景的导乐参加。数据在 NVivo 中进行了分析。研究发现,文化匹配受到一些女性的重视,但不是所有女性都重视,只有当导乐真正感兴趣、善良、及时和可靠时,文化匹配才会受到重视。这些方法(无论是否有文化匹配)都能在导乐和女性之间建立信任。信任理论、反思理论和社会关系理论支持了对导乐了解建立信任所需条件以及女性决定信任她的导乐的因果贡献的解释性理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff40/10087570/1db97859cb59/HSC-30-e5423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff40/10087570/1db97859cb59/HSC-30-e5423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff40/10087570/1db97859cb59/HSC-30-e5423-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Matching of woman and doula, and the generation of trust in an Australian volunteer doula program: Findings from a realist evaluation.产妇与导乐匹配及信任的产生:来自澳大利亚志愿者导乐项目的评估结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5423-e5433. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13965. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
How and when doula support increases confidence in women experiencing socioeconomic adversity: Findings from a realist evaluation of an Australian volunteer doula program.经济社会地位不利的妇女如何以及何时获得导乐支持从而增强信心:对澳大利亚志愿导乐项目的一项实际评估的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270755. eCollection 2022.
3
An Australian doula program for socially disadvantaged women: Developing realist evaluation theories.澳大利亚为社会弱势群体女性提供的导乐方案:发展现实主义评价理论。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e438-e446. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
4
"Being the best person that they can be and the best mum": a qualitative study of community volunteer doula support for disadvantaged mothers before and after birth in England.“成为他们所能成为的最好的人,成为最好的妈妈”:英国在产前和产后为弱势母亲提供社区志愿导乐支持的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2170-x.
5
Evaluation of trained volunteer doula services for disadvantaged women in five areas in England: women's experiences.对英格兰五个地区弱势女性的受过培训的志愿者导乐服务的评估:女性的经历
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):466-477. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12331. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
A qualitative study of volunteer doulas working alongside midwives at births in England: Mothers' and doulas' experiences.一项关于在英格兰分娩时与助产士并肩工作的志愿导乐的定性研究:母亲和导乐的经历。
Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Evaluation of an Innovative, Hospital-Based Volunteer Doula Program.一项基于医院的创新性志愿者导乐项目评估。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Nov;48(6):654-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Paradoxes in the cultural doula concept for migrant women: Implications for gender-inclusive care versus migrant-friendly maternity care.文化导乐概念对移民妇女的悖论:对性别包容的护理与移民友好的孕产护理的影响。
Midwifery. 2023 Nov;126:103805. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103805. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
9
10
A qualitative study of the experience of doula support to women in socially disadvantaged positions in Sweden: The voices of women and doulas.瑞典社会弱势群体中女性接受导乐支持的体验定性研究:女性和导乐的声音。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2024 Sep;41:101016. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101016. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Community-Informed Maternal and Infant Health Needs Assessment in Alabama.阿拉巴马州基于社区的母婴健康需求评估。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Nov;28(11):1833-1839. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03988-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Use of volunteers in early years interventions for parents: A scoping review of roles and the extent of evaluation research in this area.利用志愿者开展早期父母干预:该领域角色及评估研究范围的综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0305551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305551. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Providing woman-centred care in complex pregnancy situations.为复杂妊娠情况提供以妇女为中心的护理。
Midwifery. 2021 Nov;102:103060. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103060. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
2
An Australian doula program for socially disadvantaged women: Developing realist evaluation theories.澳大利亚为社会弱势群体女性提供的导乐方案:发展现实主义评价理论。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e438-e446. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
3
The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States.
《母亲发声研究》:美国妊娠和分娩期间的不平等与虐待现象。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.
4
Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis.分娩陪伴的认知与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3(3):CD012449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2.
5
Building capacity and wellbeing in vulnerable/marginalised mothers: A qualitative study.建设弱势/边缘母亲的能力和幸福感:一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):e341-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
6
Continuous support for women during childbirth.分娩期间对产妇的持续支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
7
A Bicultural Researcher's Reflections on Ethical Research Practices With Muslim Immigrant Women: Merging Boundaries and Challenging Binaries.一位跨文化研究者对与穆斯林移民女性开展伦理研究实践的反思:融合边界与挑战二元对立
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017 Apr/Jun;40(2):109-121. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000170.
8
'We both just wanted to be normal parents': a qualitative study of the experience of maternity care for women with learning disability.“我们都只想做普通父母”:一项关于学习障碍女性孕产护理经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e015526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015526.
9
Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review.分娩中的人权、叙事与恢复性司法:一项综述
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 2;14(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0264-3.
10
Asking different questions: research priorities to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child.提出不同问题:提高每位妇女、每个儿童医疗保健质量的研究重点。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e777-e779. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30183-8. Epub 2016 Sep 20.