Development and validation of a deep learning model for detecting signs of tuberculosis on chest radiographs among US-bound immigrants and refugees.

Immigrants and refugees seeking admission to the United States must first undergo an overseas medical exam, overseen by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), during which all persons ≥15 years old receive a chest x-ray to look for signs of tuberculosis. Although individual screening sites often implement quality control (QC) programs to ensure radiographs are interpreted correctly, the CDC does not currently have a method for conducting similar QC reviews at scale. We obtained digitized chest radiographs collected as part of the overseas immigration medical exam. Using radiographs from applicants 15 years old and older, we trained deep learning models to perform three tasks: identifying abnormal radiographs; identifying abnormal radiographs suggestive of tuberculosis; and identifying the specific findings (e.g., cavities or infiltrates) in abnormal radiographs. We then evaluated the models on both internal and external testing datasets, focusing on two classes of performance metrics: individual-level metrics, like sensitivity and specificity, and sample-level metrics, like accuracy in predicting the prevalence of abnormal radiographs. A total of 152,012 images (one image per applicant; mean applicant age 39 years) were used for model training. On our internal test dataset, our models performed well both in identifying abnormalities suggestive of TB (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 0.98) and in estimating sample-level counts of the same (-2% absolute percentage error; 95% CIC: -8%, 6%). On the external test datasets, our models performed similarly well in identifying both generic abnormalities (AUCs ranging from 0.89 to 0.92) and those suggestive of TB (AUCs from 0.94 to 0.99). This performance was consistent across metrics, including those based on thresholded class predictions, like sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Strong performance relative to high-quality radiological reference standards across a variety of datasets suggests our models may make reliable tools for supporting chest radiography QC activities at CDC.