Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73637-9.
Critical care nurses have high workloads due to the severity of the disease and the complexity of the treatment and care. Understanding the factors that influence subjective workload as well as the association between subjective and objective workload could lead to new insights to reduce critical care nurses' workload. (1) To describe critical care nurses' subjective and objective workload per shift in a university-affiliated interdisciplinary adult intensive care unit in Switzerland and (2) to explore the association between objective and subjective workload. The study used a prospective longitudinal cohort design. Critical care nurses completed the adapted Questionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work 2.0 (QEEW2.0) to assess the subjective workload after every shift for four weeks (0 = never loaded, 100 = always loaded). The objective workload was assessed with the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28), Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS), Swiss Society for Intensive Care Medicine (SGI)-patients' categories and Patient-to-Nurse Ratio (PNR). Data was analysed using multilevel mixed models. The workload of 60 critical care nurses with a total of 765 shifts were analysed. The critical care nurses experienced a subjective high mental load (66 ± 26), moderate pace and amount of work (30 ± 25) and physical load (33 ± 25), and low emotional-moral load (26 ± 22). The one-time baseline subjective workload values were higher than the day-to-day values. The mean objective shift load using the TISS-28 was 43 ± 16 points, the NEMS 36 ± 14 points, the SGI-category 1.1 ± 0.5 nurses needed per patient and the PNR 1.2 ± 0.4. We found positive associations between day-to-day objective variables with subjective pace and amount of work, with physical and mental load but not with emotional-moral load and performance. Measured objective workload is associated with only certain subjective workload domains. To promote and retain critical care nurses in the profession, nursing management should give a high priority to understanding subjective workload and strategies for reducing it.
由于疾病的严重程度和治疗及护理的复杂性,重症监护护士的工作量很大。了解影响主观工作量的因素以及主观工作量与客观工作量之间的关联,可以为减轻重症监护护士的工作量提供新的见解。(1)描述瑞士一所大学附属医院多学科成人重症监护病房中重症监护护士每班次的主观和客观工作量,(2)探讨客观和主观工作量之间的关系。该研究采用前瞻性纵向队列设计。重症监护护士在四个星期内(0=从未负荷,100=始终负荷)每班次完成适应后的工作经历和工作评价问卷 2.0(QEEW2.0)以评估主观工作量。客观工作量用治疗干预评分系统-28(TISS-28)、护理人力使用 9 等价物评分(NEMS)、瑞士重症监护医学学会(SGI)-患者分类和护士与患者比例(PNR)进行评估。使用多级混合模型进行数据分析。分析了 60 名重症监护护士共 765 班次的工作量。重症监护护士经历了较高的心理负荷(66±26)、中等的工作节奏和工作量(30±25)以及身体负荷(33±25),情绪道德负荷较低(26±22)。单次基线主观工作量值高于日常值。TISS-28 的平均单次客观负荷为 43±16 分,NEMS 为 36±14 分,每例患者需要 1.1±0.5 名 SGI 分类护士,PNR 为 1.2±0.4。我们发现日常客观变量与主观工作节奏和工作量、身体和心理负荷呈正相关,但与情绪道德负荷和绩效无关。测量的客观工作量仅与某些主观工作量领域相关。为了在该职业中促进和留住重症监护护士,护理管理应高度重视理解主观工作量和减轻主观工作量的策略。