• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年背部活动问卷的开发与验证:一种用于评估青少年腰痛功能的测量工具。

Development and Validation of the Youth Back Activity Questionnaire: A Measure of Function for Adolescents With Low Back Pain.

作者信息

Selhorst Mitchell, Metzger Christina, Rice William, Ibinson Brittany, Mansfield Christine

机构信息

Sports and Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Sep 1;50(17):E361-E367. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005169. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005169
PMID:39351861
Abstract

DESIGN

A psychometric study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to assess functional ability in adolescents with low back pain (LBP) using the Rasch model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LBP is quite common in adolescence. Currently, no method adequately measures the functional ability of adolescents with LBP. Widely used outcome measures for LBP are problematic in adolescents, with significant ceiling/floor effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred adolescents (15.4 ± 1.9 yr; 56% female) with LBP. This study was comprised of two parts: part 1: development of the Youth Back Activity Questionnaire (YouthBAQ) (n = 75), and part 2: psychometric evaluation of the newly designed YouthBAQ using the Rasch model (n = 125). Participants also completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Micheli Functional Scale (MFS), data analysis: reliability and construct validity of the YouthBAQ were assessed using Rasch analyses. Correlations with the ODI and MFS were used to determine the convergent validity of the YouthBAQ.

RESULTS

Part 1: Based on the results of the Rasch analysis, 31 items were reduced to 14. Part 2: The 14-item YouthBAQ demonstrated good reliability and construct validity, with good item fit (>0.7 and <1.3), acceptable item hierarchy and spacing, response category functioning, unidimensionality (ratio >3:1), and local independence (<0.30). The MFS demonstrated unacceptable reliability (person reliability = 0.62) and was not compared against the YouthBAQ. The ODI demonstrated acceptable reliability (person reliability = 0.70) but poor construct validity among adolescents with LBP. The YouthBAQ demonstrated a moderate correlation with the ODI ( r = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

The YouthBAQ is a quick and easily understood measure of function with good validity and reliability in adolescents with LBP. The YouthBAQ is a more appropriate measure of functional ability than the ODI or MFS in this population.

摘要

设计

一项心理测量学研究。

目的

使用拉施模型开发一种可靠且有效的患者报告结局测量方法,以评估青少年腰痛(LBP)患者的功能能力。

背景数据总结

LBP在青少年中相当常见。目前,尚无方法能充分测量青少年LBP患者的功能能力。广泛使用的LBP结局测量方法在青少年中存在问题,有明显的天花板/地板效应。

材料与方法

200名患有LBP的青少年(15.4±1.9岁;56%为女性)。本研究包括两个部分:第1部分:青少年背部活动问卷(YouthBAQ)的开发(n = 75),第2部分:使用拉施模型对新设计的YouthBAQ进行心理测量学评估(n = 125)。参与者还完成了奥斯维斯特里残疾指数(ODI)和米凯利功能量表(MFS),数据分析:使用拉施分析评估YouthBAQ的信度和结构效度。与ODI和MFS的相关性用于确定YouthBAQ的收敛效度。

结果

第1部分:基于拉施分析结果,31个项目减少到14个。第2部分:14项的YouthBAQ显示出良好的信度和结构效度,具有良好的项目拟合(>0.7且<1.3)、可接受的项目层次和间距、反应类别功能、单维性(比率>3:1)以及局部独立性(<0.30)。MFS显示出不可接受的信度(个人信度 = 0.62),未与YouthBAQ进行比较。ODI显示出可接受的信度(个人信度 = 0.70),但在青少年LBP患者中结构效度较差。YouthBAQ与ODI显示出中等相关性(r = 0.4)。

结论

YouthBAQ是一种快速且易于理解的功能测量方法,在青少年LBP患者中具有良好的效度和信度。在该人群中,YouthBAQ比ODI或MFS更适合作为功能能力的测量方法。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Youth Back Activity Questionnaire: A Measure of Function for Adolescents With Low Back Pain.青少年背部活动问卷的开发与验证:一种用于评估青少年腰痛功能的测量工具。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Sep 1;50(17):E361-E367. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005169. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Questionnaires that assess disability in children and adolescents with low back pain adhere to the concepts of the International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF), but lack validity for this population: a systematic review.评估腰痛的儿童和青少年残疾的问卷遵循国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的概念,但缺乏针对该人群的有效性:系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(10):1979-1989. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2221901. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和奥斯威斯残疾指数:在测量非特异性下腰痛的身体功能方面,哪一个具有更好的测量属性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1620-1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
4
Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.评估慢性下背痛治疗成功的常用结局指标。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain.一项系统评价强调了需要研究用于评估腰痛患者身体功能的患者报告结局测量工具的内容效度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;95:73-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS).土耳其语版下背部活动信心量表(LoBACS)的效度和信度
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Sep;48(3):347-354. doi: 10.1177/01632787241307031. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
8
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 在腰痛患者中的测量性能和最小重要变化:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.评估脊柱手术后患者报告的疼痛与功能和生活质量结局的相关性和反应性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de.